-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.5k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Cinder in-tree to CSI driver migration #1489
Comments
/sig storage |
@davidz627 @dims @adisky I assume this is also being targeted for 1.18? The KEP currently doesn't have a Test Plan defined, it only references what is in the original design proposal. The release team would like to see the KEP updated to actually contain the test plan before enhancement freeze. We'll conditionally track this for 1.18 with that in mind if you're planning on going to beta in 1.18. Thanks! |
/milestone v1.19 |
This is already done, please see kubernetes/kubernetes#85637 (comment) |
/reopen |
@msau42: Reopened this issue. In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
Hi @msau42 @davidz627 -- 1.19 Enhancements Lead here, I wanted to check in if you think this enhancement would graduate in 1.19? As Jeremy mentioned above, it would be great if a test plan can be added before moving it to GA. The current release schedule is:
|
Hi @msau42 @davidz627, pinging back as a reminder for the above. 🙂 |
I think we should remain in beta for 1.19 and work towards stabilizing the feature as well as getting it bundled with the openstack cloud controller. @adisky do you plan to continue working on this? |
Thank you @msau42 for the update. I will update the tracking sheet accordingly. 👍 |
/milestone clear |
Issues go stale after 90d of inactivity. If this issue is safe to close now please do so with Send feedback to sig-testing, kubernetes/test-infra and/or fejta. |
/remove-lifecycle stale |
@kikisdeliveryservice Let me check on this on what needs to be done , will get back. |
cc @jsafrane |
Following up: 1.20 Enhancements Freeze is October 6th. Could you let us know if you have plans for 1.20? To be included in the milestone: The KEP must be merged in an implementable state If you could please update to the new template and include the missing sections noted above that would be great. See for ref: https://github.com/kubernetes/enhancements/tree/master/keps/NNNN-kep-template I also note that the implementation history of the KEP also needs to be updated. Thanks! |
@kikisdeliveryservice Sorry for the delay . Looks like it wont be possible for 1.20 , will target for next. |
The Kubernetes project currently lacks enough contributors to adequately respond to all issues and PRs. This bot triages issues and PRs according to the following rules:
You can:
Please send feedback to sig-contributor-experience at kubernetes/community. /lifecycle stale |
/remove-lifecycle stale |
The Kubernetes project currently lacks enough contributors to adequately respond to all issues and PRs. This bot triages issues and PRs according to the following rules:
You can:
Please send feedback to sig-contributor-experience at kubernetes/community. /lifecycle stale |
/remove-lifecycle stale Update after 1.23 GA: it's still beta, to be GA in 1.24 |
/milestone v1.24 |
Hello @msau42, @davidz627 👋, 1.24 Enhancements team here. Just checking in as we approach enhancements freeze on 18:00pm PT on Thursday Feb 3rd, 2022. This enhancement is targeting Here’s where this enhancement currently stands:
Looks like for this one, we would just need to update the following:
The status of this enhancement is track as |
All of the above criteria are satisfied now that the KEP PR #3124 has been merged. This enhancement is ready for the upcoming 1.24 enhancements freeze. 🚀 For note, the status of this enhancement is now |
Hi @msau42 @davidz627 👋 1.24 Docs shadow here. This enhancement is marked as Needs Docs for the 1.24 release. Please follow the steps detailed in the documentation to open a PR against the Also, if needed take a look at Documenting for a release to familiarize yourself with the docs requirement for the release. Thanks! |
Hello @msau42 @davidz627 👋 I'm just checking in once more as we approach the 1.24 Code Freeze on 18:00 PDT, Tuesday, March 29th 2022 Please ensure the following items are completed:
Could you please confirm if following PR is part of the implementation for this enhancement? Kindly please let me know if I'm missing any related PRs other than the ones I linked above. Thank you so much! UPDATE (March 27, 2022) From the PR updating KEP 1489 for milestone GA: #3124 (comment), I confirmed that kubernetes/kubernetes#107462 is the code implementation PR. With that, the status of the enhancement is now |
Hi @msau42 @davidz627, please have a docs placeholder PR open by the 31st of March deadline. This PR can be empty for the time being. Thank you! |
@PI-Victor Doc PR is already merged: kubernetes/website#32495 |
Hello @msau42 @davidz627 👋, 1.25 Enhancements team here. This feature has been fully implemented and is now GA in K8s version 1.24. 🎉 Please update the kep.yaml file's status to This would help accurate tracking in the v1.25 cycle. Thank you so much! 🙂 |
The Kubernetes project currently lacks enough contributors to adequately respond to all issues and PRs. This bot triages issues and PRs according to the following rules:
You can:
Please send feedback to sig-contributor-experience at kubernetes/community. /lifecycle stale |
Isn't it GA in 1.24? I filed #3462 to finish the KEP and close this issue |
Enhancement Description
Parent enhancement: #625
Public Migration testing CI: LINK
TODO
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: