DRA: Fix ConsumableCapacity scheduler perf test (simplified)

[sunya-ch]

What type of PR is this?

/kind cleanup

What this PR does / why we need it:

The test for DRA Consumable Capacity failed when #133960 has been applied together with suggested change that ensures the pod will be created even the flag is set and duration is zero.

The failure might relate to the bug report in #133705. To reduce complexity of the current test case, I simplify the test case by limit to single device and remove the counter reference from Partitionable Device feature.

Which issue(s) this PR is related to:

KEP: kubernetes/enhancements#5075
Related to: #133960

Special notes for your reviewer:

Does this PR introduce a user-facing change?

NONE

Additional documentation e.g., KEPs (Kubernetes Enhancement Proposals), usage docs, etc.:

[k8s-ci-robot]

This issue is currently awaiting triage.

If a SIG or subproject determines this is a relevant issue, they will accept it by applying the triage/accepted label and provide further guidance.

The triage/accepted label can be added by org members by writing /triage accepted in a comment.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

[k8s-ci-robot]

@sunya-ch: The following test failed, say /retest to rerun all failed tests or /retest-required to rerun all mandatory failed tests:

Test name	Commit	Details	Required	Rerun command
pull-kubernetes-node-e2e-containerd-2-0-dra-alpha-beta-features	5483c52	link	false	/test pull-kubernetes-node-e2e-containerd-2-0-dra-alpha-beta-features

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard. Please help us cut down on flakes by linking to an open issue when you hit one in your PR.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

[pohly]

/lgtm
/approve

I verified in https://prow.k8s.io/view/gs/kubernetes-ci-logs/pr-logs/pull/133960/pull-kubernetes-integration/1965667620468297728 that the test passes when pod scheduling is enforced.

[k8s-ci-robot]

LGTM label has been added.

Git tree hash: 98343cb60f79ba88ff8f41035e49864ce54c834a

[k8s-ci-robot]

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: pohly, sunya-ch

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

• test/integration/scheduler_perf/OWNERS [pohly]

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

[pohly]

/skip