Skip to content

Conversation

@laravelwebdev
Copy link
Owner

@laravelwebdev laravelwebdev commented Sep 18, 2024

This pull request applies code style fixes from an analysis carried out by StyleCI.


For more information, click here.

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Chores
    • Minor formatting adjustments made to improve readability in method calls.
    • No changes to the functionality or behavior of the application.

@laravelwebdev laravelwebdev merged commit 5781b48 into main Sep 18, 2024
@laravelwebdev laravelwebdev deleted the analysis-013QEW branch September 18, 2024 07:48
@coderabbitai
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Sep 18, 2024

Caution

Review failed

The pull request is closed.

Walkthrough

The pull request involves minor formatting adjustments in the getUsersByPengelola and setOptionPengelola methods within the Helper.php file. The changes focus on improving the readability of the code by modifying the spacing around method parameters. The core functionality of the methods remains unchanged, ensuring that the logic for retrieving user IDs based on specified conditions is intact.

Changes

File Change Summary
app/Helpers/Helper.php Minor formatting adjustments in getUsersByPengelola and setOptionPengelola methods for improved readability.

Possibly related PRs

  • Apply fixes from StyleCI #28: Changes in app/Helpers/Helper.php involve formatting adjustments similar to those in the main PR, specifically in method formatting.
  • Apply fixes from StyleCI #33: Modifications in app/Helpers/Helper.php include formatting changes that align with the minor adjustments made in the main PR.
  • Apply fixes from StyleCI #38: The app/Helpers/Cetak.php file has formatting changes that enhance readability, similar to the adjustments in the main PR.
  • Apply fixes from StyleCI #39: The app/Nova/HonorSurvei.php file has formatting changes that improve readability without altering functionality, akin to the changes in the main PR.

Suggested reviewers

  • (No suggested reviewers provided)

🐰 In the code where bunnies hop,
Spaces adjusted, no need to stop.
Readability shines, like the moon's soft glow,
Logic remains, as we all know!
Hooray for the tweaks, let the coding flow! 🌟


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share
Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    -- I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    -- Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    -- @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    -- @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    -- @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.
    -- @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    -- @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    -- @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Tip

Early access features: enabled

We are currently testing the following features in early access:

  • OpenAI o1 for code reviews: OpenAI's new o1 model is being tested for code reviews. This model has advanced reasoning capabilities and can provide more nuanced feedback on your code.

Note:

  • You can enable or disable early access features from the CodeRabbit UI or by updating the CodeRabbit configuration file.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants