-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1
Content Formatting
Diagram notes can contain a lot of raw HTTP data — headers, JSON bodies, tokens, cookies, HTML responses. Without processing, this often results in diagrams that are noisy, unreadable, or too large to render. The content formatting system lets you transform, redact, and reshape this content before it appears in diagrams.
There are three levels of control:
-
DiagramFocus— Declarative per-request field highlighting. Specify which JSON fields matter and the library automatically emphasises them and de-emphasises everything else. No string manipulation required. -
ReportConfigurationOptions.RequestResponsePostProcessor— A singleFunc<string, string>applied to both requests and responses after formatting. The simplest approach for global redaction and cleanup. -
DiagramsFetcherOptions— Fine-grained control with separate pre- and post-processors for requests and responses independently. For advanced scenarios.
When a JSON body has many fields but only a few are relevant to a particular test, the diagram can feel noisy. DiagramFocus lets you declaratively highlight the fields that matter — the library automatically emphasises them and de-emphasises (or hides) the rest. No string manipulation or regex required.
Call DiagramFocus.Request<T>() or DiagramFocus.Response<T>() before the HTTP call you want to annotate. Pass lambda expressions pointing to the properties you care about:
// Highlight the "Flour" and "Eggs" fields in the request body
DiagramFocus.Request<CreateCakeRequest>(x => x.Flour, x => x.Eggs);
var response = await client.PostAsJsonAsync("/api/cake",
new CreateCakeRequest { Milk = "whole", Eggs = "free-range", Flour = "plain" });The resulting diagram note will render Flour and Eggs in bold (the default emphasis), while Milk appears in light gray (the default de-emphasis). The structural braces { and } are left unstyled.
You can focus both request and response fields for the same call:
DiagramFocus.Request<CreateCakeRequest>(x => x.Flour);
DiagramFocus.Response<CreateCakeResponse>(x => x.Id, x => x.Status);
var response = await client.PostAsJsonAsync("/api/cake", requestBody);-
Before the HTTP call —
DiagramFocus.Request<T>()/DiagramFocus.Response<T>()store the property names in anAsyncLocalcontext scoped to the current test. -
During the HTTP call —
TestTrackingMessageHandlerconsumes the pending focus fields and attaches them to theRequestResponseLogentries alongside the captured body. -
At diagram generation —
PlantUmlCreatordetects the focus fields on each log entry and passes them toJsonFocusFormatter, which annotates each line of the pretty-printed JSON with PlantUML markup.
Focus fields are consumed on use — each DiagramFocus.Request<T>() call applies only to the next HTTP request. If you make two HTTP calls and want focus on both, call DiagramFocus.Request<T>() before each one:
DiagramFocus.Request<CreateCakeRequest>(x => x.Flour);
await client.PostAsJsonAsync("/api/cake", cakeRequest);
DiagramFocus.Request<UpdateCakeRequest>(x => x.Topping);
await client.PutAsJsonAsync("/api/cake/1", updateRequest);The library applies two kinds of styling to lines in the JSON body:
- Emphasis — Applied to lines belonging to focused fields
- De-emphasis — Applied to lines belonging to non-focused fields
Both are configurable via [Flags] enums, meaning you can combine multiple modes:
| Value | Effect | PlantUML markup |
|---|---|---|
FocusEmphasis.None |
No styling | (none) |
FocusEmphasis.Bold |
Bold text (default) | <b>...</b> |
FocusEmphasis.Colored |
Blue text | <color:blue>...</color> |
FocusEmphasis.Bold | FocusEmphasis.Colored |
Bold + blue | <b><color:blue>...</color></b> |
| Value | Effect | PlantUML markup |
|---|---|---|
FocusDeEmphasis.None |
No styling | (none) |
FocusDeEmphasis.LightGray |
Gray text (default) | <color:lightgray>...</color> |
FocusDeEmphasis.SmallerText |
Smaller font | <size:9>...</size> |
FocusDeEmphasis.Hidden |
Collapsed to ...
|
Non-focused fields replaced with ...
|
FocusDeEmphasis.LightGray | FocusDeEmphasis.SmallerText |
Gray + small | <color:lightgray><size:9>...</size></color> |
Set the emphasis and de-emphasis modes on ReportConfigurationOptions (or DiagramsFetcherOptions for advanced use). These apply to all diagrams in the test run:
new ReportConfigurationOptions
{
SpecificationsTitle = "My API Specifications",
FocusEmphasis = FocusEmphasis.Bold | FocusEmphasis.Colored,
FocusDeEmphasis = FocusDeEmphasis.SmallerText
}Or via DiagramsFetcherOptions:
new DiagramsFetcherOptions
{
FocusEmphasis = FocusEmphasis.Bold,
FocusDeEmphasis = FocusDeEmphasis.Hidden
}DiagramFocus.Request<CreateCakeRequest>(x => x.Flour, x => x.Eggs);Given this JSON body:
{
"milk": "whole",
"eggs": "free-range",
"flour": "plain"
}The diagram note renders as:
{
<color:lightgray>"milk": "whole",</color>
<b>"eggs": "free-range",</b>
<b>"flour": "plain"</b>
}
milk is grayed out. eggs and flour are bold. The braces are unstyled.
// Global config
new ReportConfigurationOptions
{
FocusEmphasis = FocusEmphasis.Bold | FocusEmphasis.Colored,
FocusDeEmphasis = FocusDeEmphasis.LightGray
}{
<color:lightgray>"milk": "whole",</color>
<b><color:blue>"eggs": "free-range",</color></b>
<b><color:blue>"flour": "plain"</color></b>
}
When FocusDeEmphasis.Hidden is set, non-focused fields are completely removed from the diagram and replaced with a single ... line. Consecutive hidden fields are collapsed into one ...:
new ReportConfigurationOptions
{
FocusEmphasis = FocusEmphasis.Bold,
FocusDeEmphasis = FocusDeEmphasis.Hidden
}DiagramFocus.Response<OrderResponse>(x => x.Total);Given:
{
"orderId": "abc-123",
"customerId": "cust-456",
"items": [ ... ],
"total": 42.99,
"currency": "GBP",
"status": "confirmed"
}The diagram note renders as:
{
...
<b>"total": 42.99</b>
...
}
The three non-focused fields before total collapse into a single ..., and the two after collapse into another. Trailing commas are automatically removed from the last visible focused field before a hidden section.
Focus matching operates on top-level property names only. If a focused field's value is an object or array, the entire nested structure is included and emphasised:
DiagramFocus.Response<OrderResponse>(x => x.Items);{
"orderId": "abc-123",
"items": [
{ "name": "Cake", "qty": 1 },
{ "name": "Pie", "qty": 2 }
],
"total": 42.99
}All lines from "items" through the closing ] are emphasised; orderId and total are de-emphasised or hidden.
Property matching is case-insensitive. DiagramFocus.Request<T>(x => x.UserName) will match "userName", "UserName", or "username" in the JSON body.
-
Use focus for readability, not security — Focus is a visual aid, not a redaction tool. Non-focused fields are still present in the diagram (unless you use
Hiddenmode). Use post-processors for sensitive data redaction. -
One call per HTTP request — Each
DiagramFocus.Request<T>()applies to only the next HTTP call. If you forget to call it before a request, that request's body renders without focus styling. - Combine with post-processors — Focus and post-processors work independently and stack. Focus is applied during diagram generation (PlantUML markup), while post-processors run on the final formatted text. You can use both: focus to highlight key fields, and a post-processor to redact tokens.
- Works with any JSON body — Focus works on any request/response that contains a JSON body. Non-JSON content (XML, form-encoded, etc.) is unaffected.
- Expression safety — The lambda expressions are checked at compile time. If you rename a property, the focus call will produce a compile error, keeping your tests in sync with your DTOs.
The simplest way to process diagram content is via RequestResponsePostProcessor on ReportConfigurationOptions. This single function is applied to both request and response content after the library has formatted it (JSON pretty-printed, headers laid out):
new ReportConfigurationOptions
{
SpecificationsTitle = "My API Specifications",
RequestResponsePostProcessor = content => content
.RedactBearerTokens()
.RedactAccessTokens()
.SplitLongWords()
};This is what most integration guides show. Internally, the library maps this to both RequestPostFormattingProcessor and ResponsePostFormattingProcessor on DiagramsFetcherOptions.
For fine-grained control over how request/response bodies and headers are formatted in diagram notes, use DiagramsFetcherOptions directly. This is useful when you need different processing for requests vs responses, or when you need to transform the raw body before the library formats it.
var options = new DiagramsFetcherOptions
{
PlantUmlServerBaseUrl = "https://plantuml.com/plantuml",
RequestPreFormattingProcessor = content => content,
RequestPostFormattingProcessor = content => content,
ResponsePreFormattingProcessor = content => content,
ResponsePostFormattingProcessor = content => content,
ExcludedHeaders = ["Authorization", "X-Api-Key"]
};| Property | Type | Default | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
PlantUmlServerBaseUrl |
string |
"https://plantuml.com/plantuml" |
Base URL of the PlantUML server. |
RequestPreFormattingProcessor |
Func<string, string>? |
null |
Transform raw request body before the library formats it into the PlantUML note. |
RequestPostFormattingProcessor |
Func<string, string>? |
null |
Transform the formatted request note after the library has formatted it. |
ResponsePreFormattingProcessor |
Func<string, string>? |
null |
Transform raw response body before the library formats it into the PlantUML note. |
ResponsePostFormattingProcessor |
Func<string, string>? |
null |
Transform the formatted response note after the library has formatted it. |
ExcludedHeaders |
IEnumerable<string> |
[] |
HTTP headers to exclude from diagram notes. |
SeparateSetup |
bool |
false |
When true, HTTP calls made before StartAction() are wrapped in a visual "Setup" partition in the diagram. See Diagram Customisation. |
HighlightSetup |
bool |
true |
When true (and SeparateSetup is enabled), the setup partition is rendered with a background colour. When false, the partition has no background colour. |
FocusEmphasis |
FocusEmphasis |
Bold |
How focused fields are styled in diagram notes. Flags enum — combine with |. See Content Formatting#DiagramFocus (Field Highlighting). |
FocusDeEmphasis |
FocusDeEmphasis |
LightGray |
How non-focused fields are styled in diagram notes. Flags enum — combine with |. See Content Formatting#DiagramFocus (Field Highlighting). |
The formatting pipeline for each request/response is:
Raw body → PreFormattingProcessor → Library formatting (JSON pretty-print, header layout) → DiagramFocus styling → PostFormattingProcessor → Diagram note
- Pre-processor — Runs on the raw body text before the library formats it (JSON pretty-printing, header extraction, etc.). Use this to deserialise, decrypt, decompress, or restructure the raw content so the library's formatter can process it correctly.
- DiagramFocus — Applied automatically during diagram generation. Annotates lines of the pretty-printed JSON with PlantUML emphasis/de-emphasis markup based on the focus fields set by the test. Runs before post-processors.
- Post-processor — Runs on the fully formatted note text after the library has laid it out (including any DiagramFocus markup). Use this to redact sensitive values, shorten long strings, strip noise, or wrap long lines. This is the one you'll use most often.
The distinction matters because the library's built-in formatting does several things automatically:
- Pretty-prints JSON bodies with indentation
- Lays out headers in
[Key=Value]format - Handles content-type detection
If the raw body isn't in a format the library recognises (e.g. it's compressed, encrypted, or non-JSON), the formatter can't do its job. That's where pre-processors come in.
Pre-processors operate on the raw body string before the library formats it. They're essential when the raw content needs to be transformed into something the library's JSON pretty-printer can work with, or when the raw format isn't useful in its original form.
Note: Pre-processors are set via
DiagramsFetcherOptions(separateRequestPreFormattingProcessorandResponsePreFormattingProcessor), not viaReportConfigurationOptions. If you only need post-processing, useReportConfigurationOptions.RequestResponsePostProcessorinstead.
If your SUT communicates with SOAP or XML-based services, the raw body is typically a single long line of XML. The library's formatter won't pretty-print it (it only handles JSON). Use a pre-processor to format it:
RequestPreFormattingProcessor = body =>
{
try { return XDocument.Parse(body).ToString(); }
catch { return body; } // Not XML, leave as-is
}Before (raw):
<soap:Envelope xmlns:soap="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/envelope/"><soap:Body><GetCustomerResponse><Id>123</Id><Name>John Doe</Name></GetCustomerResponse></soap:Body></soap:Envelope>
After (pre-processed, then shown in diagram):
<soap:Envelope xmlns:soap="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/envelope/">
<soap:Body>
<GetCustomerResponse>
<Id>123</Id>
<Name>John Doe</Name>
</GetCustomerResponse>
</soap:Body>
</soap:Envelope>Some APIs return compressed bodies. If the HttpClient pipeline hasn't decompressed them before tracking captures the content, the raw body will be binary gibberish:
ResponsePreFormattingProcessor = body =>
{
try
{
var bytes = Convert.FromBase64String(body);
using var input = new MemoryStream(bytes);
using var gzip = new GZipStream(input, CompressionMode.Decompress);
using var reader = new StreamReader(gzip);
return reader.ReadToEnd();
}
catch { return body; }
}If a downstream service returns encrypted payloads (e.g. JWE tokens or encrypted JSON fields), the raw body is opaque. A pre-processor can decrypt it so the diagram shows the actual content:
RequestPreFormattingProcessor = body =>
{
try
{
var decrypted = encryptionService.Decrypt(body);
return decrypted;
}
catch { return body; }
}POST requests with application/x-www-form-urlencoded content appear as a single line of key=value&key=value pairs. Transform them into a more readable layout:
RequestPreFormattingProcessor = body =>
{
if (!body.Contains('=') || body.TrimStart().StartsWith('{'))
return body; // Not form-encoded, or is JSON
try
{
var pairs = body.Split('&')
.Select(p => p.Split('=', 2))
.Where(p => p.Length == 2)
.Select(p => $"{Uri.UnescapeDataString(p[0])}: {Uri.UnescapeDataString(p[1])}");
return string.Join("\n", pairs);
}
catch { return body; }
}Before:
grant_type=authorization_code&code=abc123&redirect_uri=https%3A%2F%2Fapp.example.com%2Fcallback&client_id=my-app
After:
grant_type: authorization_code
code: abc123
redirect_uri: https://app.example.com/callback
client_id: my-app
Some APIs wrap JSON inside another format (e.g. an envelope or a Base64-encoded field). A pre-processor can extract the inner JSON so the library can pretty-print it:
ResponsePreFormattingProcessor = body =>
{
try
{
var envelope = JsonSerializer.Deserialize<JsonElement>(body);
if (envelope.TryGetProperty("data", out var data) && data.ValueKind == JsonValueKind.String)
{
// "data" contains a JSON string — extract and return it so the library pretty-prints it
var inner = data.GetString()!;
return JsonSerializer.Serialize(
JsonSerializer.Deserialize<JsonElement>(inner),
new JsonSerializerOptions { WriteIndented = true });
}
return body;
}
catch { return body; }
}You can use both simultaneously. A common pattern is pre-processing to make the body parseable, then post-processing to redact sensitive values from the formatted output:
var options = new DiagramsFetcherOptions
{
// First: decode form-encoded token requests so the library can format them
RequestPreFormattingProcessor = body =>
{
if (!body.Contains('=') || body.TrimStart().StartsWith('{')) return body;
try
{
var pairs = body.Split('&')
.Select(p => p.Split('=', 2))
.Where(p => p.Length == 2)
.Select(p => $"{Uri.UnescapeDataString(p[0])}: {Uri.UnescapeDataString(p[1])}");
return string.Join("\n", pairs);
}
catch { return body; }
},
// Then: redact tokens from the final formatted output
RequestPostFormattingProcessor = content => content
.RedactMiddle(new Regex(@"(?<=code: )\S+"))
.RedactMiddle(new Regex(@"(?<=client_secret: )\S+")),
ResponsePostFormattingProcessor = content => content
.RedactMiddle(new Regex("(?<=\"access_token\": \")[^\"]+(?=\")"))
.RedactMiddle(new Regex("(?<=\"refresh_token\": \")[^\"]+(?=\")"))
};Tip: Always wrap pre-processors in try-catch blocks. The raw body may not be in the format you expect (e.g. a different content type, an error response, or empty). If the pre-processor throws, the diagram generation for that test will fail. Return the original
bodyin the catch block to fall through gracefully.
Post-processors are the most commonly used. They operate on the fully formatted note text — the final string that will appear in the PlantUML diagram note, including headers and body content already laid out by the library.
Bearer tokens are long, opaque strings that add significant noise to diagrams without providing useful information. A simple regex replacement shortens them:
RequestResponsePostProcessor = content =>
Regex.Replace(content, @"Bearer [A-Za-z0-9\-._~+/]+=*", "Bearer ***")PlantUML line wrapping: When tokens are very long, PlantUML may split them across multiple lines with
$color(gray)markup on continuation lines. If you see partially redacted tokens in rendered diagrams, use a regex that accounts for the wrapped format:private static readonly Regex BearerTokenRegex = new( @"(Bearer )[A-Za-z0-9\-._~+/_]+=*(?:\r?\n\$color\(gray\)[A-Za-z0-9\-._~+/_]+=*)*", RegexOptions.Compiled); RequestResponsePostProcessor = content => BearerTokenRegex.Replace(content, "$1***")Alternatively, ensure your
RedactBearerTokens()call runs beforeSplitLongWords()in the pipeline so the token is redacted before it gets split.
Before:
[Authorization=Bearer eyJhbGciOiJSUzI1NiIsInR5cCI6IkpXVCJ9.eyJzdWIiOiIxMjM0NTY3ODkwIiwibmFtZSI6IkpvaG4gRG9lIiwiaWF0IjoxNTE2MjM5MDIyfQ.SflKxwRJ...]
After:
[Authorization=Bearer ***]
Tokens also appear in JSON response bodies (access tokens, refresh tokens, ID tokens). Target them with regex that matches the JSON structure:
private static readonly Regex AccessTokenRegex = new("(?<=\"access_token\": \")[^\"]+(?=\")");
private static readonly Regex RefreshTokenRegex = new("(?<=\"refresh_token\": \")[^\"]+(?=\")");
private static readonly Regex IdTokenRegex = new("(?<=\"id_token\": \")[^\"]+(?=\")");
RequestResponsePostProcessor = content => content
.RedactMiddle(AccessTokenRegex)
.RedactMiddle(RefreshTokenRegex)
.RedactMiddle(IdTokenRegex)Where RedactMiddle keeps the start and end of the token visible for debugging while redacting the bulk:
private static string RedactMiddle(this string value, Regex regex) =>
regex.Replace(value, m =>
m.Value.Length > 50
? m.Value[..8] + "_REDACTED_" + m.Value[^18..]
: m.Value);Before:
"access_token": "eyJhbGciOiJSUzI1NiIsInR5cCI6IkpXVCJ9.eyJzdWIiOiIxMjM0NTY3ODkwIiwibmFtZSI6IkpvaG4gRG9lIn0.Sfl..."After:
"access_token": "eyJhbGc_REDACTED_KxwRJSMeKKF2QT4"Cookie headers often contain long session tokens that bloat diagrams:
private static readonly Regex SetCookieRegex = new(@"(?<=\[Set-Cookie=)[^\]]+(?=])");
private static readonly Regex CookieRegex = new(@"(?<=\[Cookie=)[^\]]+(?=])");
RequestResponsePostProcessor = content => content
.RedactEnding(SetCookieRegex, 50)
.RedactEnding(CookieRegex, 50)Where RedactEnding keeps only the first N characters:
private static string RedactEnding(this string value, Regex regex, int length = 30) =>
regex.Replace(value, m =>
m.Value.Length > 200
? m.Value[..length] + "_RedactedEnding"
: m.Value);Tokens, Base64-encoded values, and other long unbroken strings can make diagram notes extremely wide, sometimes exceeding PlantUML's rendering limits. Break them across lines:
private static string SplitWordsOverMaxLength(this string value, int maxLength = 200)
{
var words = value.Split("\n")
.SelectMany(line => line.Trim().Split(' '))
.Where(w => !string.IsNullOrWhiteSpace(w));
foreach (var word in words.Where(w => w.Length > maxLength))
{
var chunks = word.Chunk(maxLength).Select(c => new string(c));
value = value.Replace(word, string.Join("\n", chunks));
}
return value;
}Some payloads contain long string values (e.g. serialised JSON inside a JSON field, or EventGrid event payloads) that should be wrapped at a reasonable line length:
private static readonly Regex EventGridValueRegex =
new("(?<=\"(?:request|response)\": \")[^\"]+");
private static string WrapLongValues(this string value, int maxLineLength = 90) =>
EventGridValueRegex.Replace(value, match =>
match.Value.Length <= maxLineLength
? match.Value
: string.Join("\n", match.Value.Chunk(maxLineLength).Select(c => new string(c))));Some downstream services (identity providers, OAuth consent pages, etc.) return full HTML pages in their responses. These can be thousands of characters and make diagrams unrenderable. Replace them above a size threshold:
private const int HtmlMaxCharactersBeforeRedacting = 3_000;
private static string RedactLargeHtmlResponses(this string value)
{
var startTag = "<html";
var endTag = "</html";
if (!value.Contains(startTag))
return value;
if (value.Length > HtmlMaxCharactersBeforeRedacting)
{
var before = value.Split(startTag)[0];
var afterEnd = value.Split(startTag)[1].Split(endTag)[1];
return before + startTag + ">...REDACTED..." + endTag + afterEnd.Trim();
}
return value;
}Rather than just redacting tokens, you can extract useful information from JWTs and annotate them in the diagram. For example, extracting the auth_level claim:
private static string ExposeAuthLevelsOfAccessTokens(this string value)
{
var regex = new Regex("(\"access_token\": \")(.*)(\",)");
return regex.Replace(value, match =>
{
try
{
var token = new JwtSecurityTokenHandler().ReadJwtToken(match.Groups[2].Value);
var authLevel = token.Claims.FirstOrDefault(x => x.Type == "auth_level");
return authLevel is null
? match.Value
: match.Value + $" /* [auth_level={authLevel.Value}] */";
}
catch
{
return match.Value; // Not a JWT, leave as-is
}
});
}Before:
"access_token": "eyJhbGciOiJSUzI1NiJ9.eyJhdXRoX2xldmVsIjoiMiIsInN1YiI6InVzZXIxIn0.sig...",After:
"access_token": "eyJhbGc_REDACTED_KxwRJSMeKKF2QT4", /* [auth_level=2] */This gives you the security-relevant metadata at a glance without the raw token noise.
In practice, you'll combine multiple techniques into a fluent processing pipeline. Here's a complete real-world example for an API that deals with authentication tokens, cookies, and identity provider responses:
public static class DiagramContentProcessor
{
// --- Token patterns ---
private static readonly Regex AccessTokenRegex =
new("(?<=\"access_token\": \")[^\"]+(?=\")");
private static readonly Regex BearerTokenRegex =
new(@"(?<=Bearer )([^\]]+)");
private static readonly Regex RefreshTokenRegex =
new("(?<=\"refresh_token\": \")[^\"]+(?=\")");
private static readonly Regex IdTokenRegex =
new("(?<=\"id_token\": \")[^\"]+(?=\")");
// --- Cookie patterns ---
private static readonly Regex SetCookieRegex =
new(@"(?<=\[Set-Cookie=)[^\]]+(?=])");
private static readonly Regex CookieRegex =
new(@"(?<=\[Cookie=)[^\]]+(?=])");
// --- Session / long value patterns ---
private static readonly Regex SessionDataRegex =
new("(?<=\"sessionData\": \")[^\"]+(?=\")");
/// <summary>
/// The post-processor function — wire this into ReportConfigurationOptions.
/// </summary>
public static Func<string, string> PostProcessor => content => content
.ExposeAuthLevels()
.RedactMiddle(AccessTokenRegex)
.RedactMiddle(BearerTokenRegex)
.RedactMiddle(RefreshTokenRegex)
.RedactMiddle(IdTokenRegex)
.RedactEnding(SetCookieRegex, 50)
.RedactEnding(CookieRegex, 50)
.RedactEnding(SessionDataRegex, 30)
.RedactLargeHtml()
.SplitLongWords();
// --- Redaction helpers (extension methods) ---
private static string RedactMiddle(this string value, Regex regex) =>
regex.Replace(value, m =>
m.Value.Length > 50
? m.Value[..8] + "_REDACTED_" + m.Value[^18..]
: m.Value);
private static string RedactEnding(this string value, Regex regex, int length) =>
regex.Replace(value, m =>
m.Value.Length > 200
? m.Value[..length] + "_RedactedEnding"
: m.Value);
private static string ExposeAuthLevels(this string value)
{
var regex = new Regex("(\"access_token\": \")(.*)(\",)");
return regex.Replace(value, match =>
{
try
{
var token = new JwtSecurityTokenHandler().ReadJwtToken(match.Groups[2].Value);
var claim = token.Claims.FirstOrDefault(c => c.Type == "auth_level");
return claim is null ? match.Value : match.Value + $" /* [auth_level={claim.Value}] */";
}
catch { return match.Value; }
});
}
private static string RedactLargeHtml(this string value)
{
if (!value.Contains("<html")) return value;
if (value.Length <= 3_000) return value;
var before = value.Split("<html")[0];
var afterEnd = value.Split("<html")[1].Split("</html")[1];
return before + "<html>...REDACTED...</html" + afterEnd.Trim();
}
private static string SplitLongWords(this string value, int maxLength = 200)
{
foreach (var word in value.Split('\n').SelectMany(l => l.Split(' ')).Where(w => w.Length > maxLength))
value = value.Replace(word, string.Join("\n", word.Chunk(maxLength).Select(c => new string(c))));
return value;
}
}Wire it up:
// In your test setup / report configuration
new ReportConfigurationOptions
{
SpecificationsTitle = "My API Specifications",
RequestResponsePostProcessor = DiagramContentProcessor.PostProcessor,
ExcludedHeaders = ["X-Request-Id", "X-Correlation-Id"]
}The order you chain redaction steps matters. Recommended order:
-
Extract useful metadata from tokens (e.g.
ExposeAuthLevels) — do this before redacting, so you can still read the JWT -
Redact tokens and secrets (
RedactMiddle/RedactEnding) — remove sensitive values - Redact cookies and session data — reduce noise from large cookie headers
- Redact large HTML — prevent oversized diagrams from identity provider responses
- Split long words — break any remaining long strings so PlantUML can render them
If you redact tokens before extracting claims, the JWT will already be truncated and unreadable.
- Test your processor by running your test suite and checking the generated PlantUML. If diagrams are still too wide or fail to render, you likely have unredacted long values.
-
Use
RedactMiddlefor tokens — keeping the start and end visible makes it possible to correlate which token is which across diagram notes. -
Use
RedactEndingfor cookies and session data where only the name/start matters. - Set a size threshold for HTML redaction (e.g. 3,000 characters) so small HTML fragments still appear but full pages are collapsed.
- Pre-processors vs post-processors: Use pre-processors only when you need to transform the raw body before the library's JSON pretty-printer runs (e.g. decrypting, decompressing, parsing XML). For everything else, use post-processors — they operate on the final formatted text which is more predictable to regex against.
Getting Started
Common Tasks
Integration Guides
- Integration xUnit3
- Integration xUnit2
- Integration NUnit
- Integration MSTest
- Integration TUnit
- Integration BDDfy xUnit3
- Integration LightBDD xUnit2
- Integration LightBDD xUnit3
- Integration LightBDD TUnit
- Integration ReqNRoll xUnit2
- Integration ReqNRoll xUnit3
- Integration ReqNRoll TUnit
Extensions
- Integration AtlasDataApi Extension
- Integration BigQuery Extension
- Integration Bigtable Extension
- Integration BlobStorage Extension
- Integration ClickHouse Extension
- Integration CloudStorage Extension
- Integration CosmosDB Extension
- Integration Dapper Extension
- Integration DynamoDB Extension
- Integration EF Core Relational Extension
- Integration Elasticsearch Extension
- Integration EventBridge Extension
- Integration EventHubs Extension
- Integration Grpc Extension
- Integration Kafka Extension
- Integration MassTransit Extension
- Integration MongoDB Extension
- Integration MySqlConnector Extension
- Integration Npgsql Extension
- Integration Oracle Extension
- Integration PubSub Extension
- Integration Redis Extension
- Integration S3 Extension
- Integration ServiceBus Extension
- Integration SNS Extension
- Integration Spanner Extension
- Integration SqlClient Extension
- Integration Sqlite Extension
- Integration SQS Extension
- Integration StorageQueues Extension
- Integration OpenTelemetry Extension
- Integration DispatchProxy Extension
- Integration MediatR Extension
- Integration PlantUML IKVM
Configuration
- Tracking Dependencies
- Tracking Custom Dependencies
- HTTP Tracking Setup
- Report Configuration
- Diagram Customisation
- Phase-Aware Tracking
- Content Formatting
- PlantUML Server Configuration
Features
- Generated Reports
- Search Syntax
- Component Diagrams
- PlantUML Browser Rendering
- Inline SVG Rendering
- Internal Flow Tracking
- Tags and Attributes
- Excluding Requests
- Excluded Headers
- Multi-Host Test Architectures
- Event-Driven Architecture Testing
- Service Bus Tracking Patterns
- Background Thread Correlation
- Parallel-Safe Background Correlation
- Event & Message Tracking
- Assertion Tracking
- Step Tracking
- Tabular Attributes
- Large Response and Diagram Handling
- Diagnostics and Debugging
- CI Summary Integration
- CI Artifact Upload
- Merging Parallel Reports
Reference