2.0.0 promises #2021
Merged
2.0.0 promises #2021
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
added 2 commits
May 20, 2014 15:37
|
nice work! |
|
Just needs Promise defined in the jshint settings. Again will do that and merge when I have time. I'm hoping to do some work on less in the next couple of weeks. |
|
I've fixed the jshintrc :) |
|
cool thanks |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
We discussed moving from returning an event emitter to returning a promise. This implements the change.
Since future versions of node.js (and indeed all JavaScript environments) are going to have promises built in, this attempts to use built in promises if available, then falls back to requiring 'promise' as a polyfill.