Skip to content

Conversation

@suhaibmujahid
Copy link
Contributor

It is not Go idiomatic to put Get into the getter's name (see here).

Based on the discussion with @lhchavez on Slack. He suggested the renaming and adding backward compatibility.

Copy link
Contributor

@lhchavez lhchavez left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks for doing this!

@suhaibmujahid
Copy link
Contributor Author

Thank you for the corrections 👍

Copy link
Contributor

@lhchavez lhchavez left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

since I can't squash this commit, do you mind doing that? otherwise looks good!

It is not Go idiomatic to put Get into the getter's name.

https: //golang.org/doc/effective_go.html#Getters
Co-Authored-By: lhchavez <lhchavez@users.noreply.github.com>
@suhaibmujahid
Copy link
Contributor Author

Done!

@lhchavez lhchavez merged commit 31f877e into libgit2:master May 10, 2020
@suhaibmujahid suhaibmujahid deleted the method-rename branch May 10, 2020 03:40
lhchavez added a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 15, 2020
It is not Go idiomatic to put Get into the getter's name

(cherry picked from commit 31f877e)
lhchavez added a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 15, 2020
It is not Go idiomatic to put Get into the getter's name

(cherry picked from commit 31f877e)
lhchavez added a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 15, 2020
It is not Go idiomatic to put Get into the getter's name

(cherry picked from commit 31f877e)
lhchavez added a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 15, 2020
It is not Go idiomatic to put Get into the getter's name

(cherry picked from commit 31f877e)
lhchavez added a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 16, 2020
It is not Go idiomatic to put Get into the getter's name

(cherry picked from commit 31f877e)
lhchavez added a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 16, 2020
It is not Go idiomatic to put Get into the getter's name

(cherry picked from commit 31f877e)
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants