-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 215
Add doc checking to helper.pl #135
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
|
damn, that's more work than I expected :-D |
3351dd9 to
7b0508e
Compare
No, it isn't, @sjaeckel ;-) Thought I did everything correct, but I didn't. Obviously. As expected ;-) Not all the findings were implemented, some of them are more or less internal (private) functions, I think. Add them nevertheless? |
7b0508e to
57b7863
Compare
|
After rebasing on current develop |
|
That's why I'd leave this PR until after the release ;-) |
minad
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Good idea and obviously much needed to keep docs in sync!
57b7863 to
d224791
Compare
|
@karel-m Is this ready to merge? |
sjaeckel
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
IMO ready to merge after another rebase on top of develop
d224791 to
667ce28
Compare
|
After rebasing there are still these issues: |
We should open another PR which adds a travis target to always run this check where those errors must then be fixed |
As suggested in another PR I have added a check whether all macros and functions from
tommath.hare documented indoc/bn.tex.Current status: