Skip to content

Conversation

@tisnik
Copy link
Contributor

@tisnik tisnik commented Oct 19, 2025

Description

LCORE-632: update package descriptions

Type of change

  • Refactor
  • New feature
  • Bug fix
  • CVE fix
  • Optimization
  • Documentation Update
  • Configuration Update
  • Bump-up service version
  • Bump-up dependent library
  • Bump-up library or tool used for development (does not change the final image)
  • CI configuration change
  • Konflux configuration change
  • Unit tests improvement
  • Integration tests improvement
  • End to end tests improvement

Related Tickets & Documents

  • Related Issue #LCORE-632

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Documentation
    • Expanded README content across multiple modules (cache, metrics, quota, runners, utils, endpoints, models)
    • Added entries describing new components and modules and updated existing module descriptions for clarity
    • Fixed wording and typos in utility documentation for improved readability

@coderabbitai
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Oct 19, 2025

Warning

Rate limit exceeded

@tisnik has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 22 minutes and 42 seconds before requesting another review.

⌛ How to resolve this issue?

After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the @coderabbitai review command as a PR comment. Alternatively, push new commits to this PR.

We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit.

🚦 How do rate limits work?

CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization.

Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout.

Please see our FAQ for further information.

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between d837b71 and 27bff8d.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • src/utils/README.md (2 hunks)
  • src/utils/connection_decorator.py (1 hunks)

Walkthrough

This PR adds and updates multiple README files across the repository to document new and existing modules (endpoints, cache, quota, metrics, models, runners, utils, and a llama stack configuration entry). No functional code changes.

Changes

Cohort / File(s) Summary
Top-level docs
src/README.md
Added "Llama Stack configuration handling" entry documenting llama_stack_configuration.py.
Endpoints README
src/app/endpoints/README.md
Added entries and list items for conversations_v2.py, providers.py, shields.py, and tools.py.
Cache package docs
src/cache/README.md, src/cache/*
New README listing __init__.py, cache.py, cache_error.py, cache_factory.py, in_memory_cache.py, noop_cache.py, postgres_cache.py, sqlite_cache.py.
Metrics README
src/metrics/README.md
Adjusted module description text (renamed "Lightspeed Stack" → "Lightspeed Core Stack").
Models README
src/models/README.md
Added documentation entry for cache_entry.py alongside existing model docs.
Quota package README
src/quota/README.md, src/quota/*
New README listing __init__.py and sql.py with brief descriptions.
Runners README
src/runners/README.md
Added quota_scheduler.py entry to the runners documentation.
Utils README & docs
src/utils/README.md, src/utils/connection_decorator.py, src/utils/*
Documented connection_decorator.py, token_counter.py, tool_formatter.py; fixed typos in connection_decorator.py docstrings (Decocator → Decorator); updated __init__.py description ordering.

Estimated code review effort

🎯 2 (Simple) | ⏱️ ~10 minutes

Possibly related PRs

Suggested reviewers

  • matysek

Poem

"I hop through README glades tonight,
I tuck new files in lines just right.
From cache to shields, each note I pen,
A tidy trail for fellow hens. 🐇📚"

Pre-merge checks and finishing touches

✅ Passed checks (3 passed)
Check name Status Explanation
Description Check ✅ Passed Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
Title Check ✅ Passed The pull request title "LCORE-632: update package descriptions" directly corresponds to the main content of the changeset. The vast majority of changes involve updating README files across multiple package directories (src/README.md, src/app/endpoints/README.md, src/cache/README.md, src/metrics/README.md, src/models/README.md, src/quota/README.md, src/runners/README.md, and src/utils/README.md) to document new modules and update descriptions. While there is one minor code change—a docstring typo fix in connection_decorator.py—this does not alter the primary purpose of the PR. The title is concise, clear, and would allow a teammate scanning the commit history to immediately understand that this PR focuses on documentation updates for package descriptions.
Docstring Coverage ✅ Passed Docstring coverage is 100.00% which is sufficient. The required threshold is 80.00%.

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 81e2dfc and 637589b.

📒 Files selected for processing (8)
  • src/README.md (1 hunks)
  • src/app/endpoints/README.md (2 hunks)
  • src/cache/README.md (1 hunks)
  • src/metrics/README.md (1 hunks)
  • src/models/README.md (1 hunks)
  • src/quota/README.md (1 hunks)
  • src/runners/README.md (1 hunks)
  • src/utils/README.md (2 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 LanguageTool
src/utils/README.md

[grammar] ~12-~12: Ensure spelling is correct
Context: ...he project. ## connection_decorator.py Decocator that makes sure the object is 'connecte...

(QB_NEW_EN_ORTHOGRAPHY_ERROR_IDS_1)

🔇 Additional comments (9)
src/metrics/README.md (1)

4-4: Branding update looks good.

The description now correctly reflects "Lightspeed Core Stack," which appears to be a consistent naming convention across other documentation in this PR.

src/runners/README.md (1)

6-7: Documentation entry follows established format.

The new quota_scheduler.py entry is well-positioned and the description is clear.

src/app/endpoints/README.md (1)

15-16: New endpoint documentation is well-integrated.

All four new endpoint entries (conversations_v2.py, providers.py, shields.py, tools.py) follow the established format and have clear, concise descriptions that reflect their purpose.

Also applies to: 33-34, 42-43, 48-49

src/models/README.md (1)

6-7: New model documentation is appropriate.

The cache_entry.py entry clearly describes its purpose and is well-positioned in the file list.

src/README.md (1)

18-19: New top-level module documentation looks good.

The llama_stack_configuration.py entry is clear and well-positioned in the src/ documentation.

src/quota/README.md (1)

1-8: New quota package documentation is well-structured.

The README follows the established pattern and provides clear descriptions for both package files. Documentation is minimal but sufficient for navigation.

src/cache/README.md (1)

1-26: Cache package documentation is comprehensive and clear.

This new README provides useful descriptions for all cache implementations, giving developers good overview of cache architecture and options (in-memory, no-op, PostgreSQL, SQLite).

src/utils/README.md (2)

4-4: Updated init.py description is more descriptive.

The new description better conveys the purpose of the utils module.


27-28: New utility modules are well-documented.

The token_counter.py and tool_formatter.py entries have clear descriptions that help users understand their purpose. Format is consistent with other entries.

Also applies to: 30-31

Comment on lines 12 to 13
## [connection_decorator.py](connection_decorator.py)
Decocator that makes sure the object is 'connected' according to it's connected predicate.
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

⚠️ Potential issue | 🟡 Minor

Fix typo in connection_decorator.py description.

Line 13 has a spelling error: "Decocator" should be "Decorator". Additionally, consider fixing the grammar: "according to it's connected predicate" should use "its" (possessive) instead of "it's" (contraction).

Apply this diff to fix the typo and grammar:

-Decocator that makes sure the object is 'connected' according to it's connected predicate.
+Decorator that makes sure the object is 'connected' according to its connected predicate.
📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

Suggested change
## [connection_decorator.py](connection_decorator.py)
Decocator that makes sure the object is 'connected' according to it's connected predicate.
## [connection_decorator.py](connection_decorator.py)
Decorator that makes sure the object is 'connected' according to its connected predicate.
🧰 Tools
🪛 LanguageTool

[grammar] ~12-~12: Ensure spelling is correct
Context: ...he project. ## connection_decorator.py Decocator that makes sure the object is 'connecte...

(QB_NEW_EN_ORTHOGRAPHY_ERROR_IDS_1)

🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In src/utils/README.md around lines 12 to 13, the header description has a typo
and grammar issue: change "Decocator" to "Decorator" and replace "it's" with the
possessive "its" so the line reads something like "Decorator that makes sure the
object is 'connected' according to its connected predicate." Make this exact
wording update to correct spelling and grammar.

@tisnik tisnik force-pushed the lcore-632-update-package-descriptions branch from d837b71 to 27bff8d Compare October 19, 2025 11:13
@tisnik tisnik merged commit 70625df into lightspeed-core:main Oct 19, 2025
18 of 20 checks passed
@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot mentioned this pull request Oct 26, 2025
15 tasks
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant