Document GitHub teams and repo access rules #3912
Conversation
Signed-off-by: Jan Dubois <jan.dubois@suse.com>
jandubois
force-pushed
the
github-teams
branch
from
f07b1df to
6db27d2
Compare
| * All committers are members of the `@lima-vm/committers` team and have the `Maintain` role on all repos. | ||
| * All reviewers are members of the `@lima-vm/reviewers` team and have the `Triage` role on all repos. | ||
| * The `@lima-vm/maintainers` team includes both committers and reviewers, but doesn't grant any extra access. | ||
|
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Do we need to mention the org owners? (including caniszczyk and thelinuxfoundation)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I don't think so. Ultimately the org owner is the CNCF. How the maintenance of the org is delegated by CNCF is not really part of the Lima governance but CNCF governance, imo.
| Access control is enforced via GitHub team membership: | ||
| * All committers are members of the `@lima-vm/committers` team and have the `Maintain` role on all repos. | ||
| * All reviewers are members of the `@lima-vm/reviewers` team and have the `Triage` role on all repos. | ||
| * The `@lima-vm/maintainers` team includes both committers and reviewers, but doesn't grant any extra access. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The teams are only visible to the org members.
If @rata wants to confirm the teams, we have to invite him to the org.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
We can do this, if he wants. But this is due-diligence to check that actual practices match documented practices, not an audit.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The teams are only visible to the org members.
If @rata wants to confirm the teams, we have to invite him to the org.
Did you mean @rochaporto?
AkihiroSuda
added
documentation
3 participants
Ref #3795 (comment)