Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Itr supp #18

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jul 22, 2016
Merged

Itr supp #18

merged 1 commit into from
Jul 22, 2016

Conversation

jenswi-linaro
Copy link

Implements support to interrupt RPC to tee-supplicant if tee-supplicant isn't started yet. Related to OP-TEE/optee_os#922.

Please ignore the first two commits are from #17

@sorenb-xlnx
Copy link

I cannot really comment on the details of the implementation as I'm not familiar with the design of the TEE subsystem. But I tried these patches and they solve the issue described in OP-TEE/optee_os#922. Thanks.

@jbech-linaro
Copy link

Patch 3: Reviewed-by: Joakim Bech <joakim.bech@linaro.org>

@jenswi-linaro
Copy link
Author

Tag applied, ready to merge

@@ -45,6 +45,7 @@ void optee_supp_uninit(struct optee_supp *supp)
u32 optee_supp_thrd_req(struct tee_context *ctx, u32 func, size_t num_params,
struct tee_param *param)
{
bool interruptable;

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Sorry to nitpick, but I don't think the spelling is correct. Should that be 'interrupted' instead? (past tense).

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

seems "interruptable" is used in technical writings, and has the same meaning as 'interruptible'.

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yeah, my bad. Still, my question about using the past tense remains ;)

Copy link
Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The variable indicates whether we may interrupt here, we already know that someone is trying to interrupt. If there's a supplicant we shouldn't. But I'm inclined to change it to interruptible to harmonize better with the function names.

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

OK, now I got it.

@jforissier
Copy link

Aside from my grammatical concern ;) this is also:
Tested-by: Jerome Forissier <jerome.forissier@linaro.org> (HiKey)

Allows an RPC to tee-supplicant to be interrupted if the supplicant
isn't available yet.

Tested-by: Jerome Forissier <jerome.forissier@linaro.org> (HiKey)
Reviewed-by: Joakim Bech <joakim.bech@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Jens Wiklander <jens.wiklander@linaro.org>
@jenswi-linaro
Copy link
Author

Tag applied, ready to merge.

@jforissier jforissier merged commit 1bc68f9 into linaro-swg:optee Jul 22, 2016
@jenswi-linaro jenswi-linaro deleted the itr_supp branch July 22, 2016 07:20
vchong pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 24, 2017
commit 4dfce57 upstream.

There have been several reports over the years of NULL pointer
dereferences in xfs_trans_log_inode during xfs_fsr processes,
when the process is doing an fput and tearing down extents
on the temporary inode, something like:

BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at 0000000000000018
PID: 29439  TASK: ffff880550584fa0  CPU: 6   COMMAND: "xfs_fsr"
    [exception RIP: xfs_trans_log_inode+0x10]
 #9 [ffff8800a57bbbe0] xfs_bunmapi at ffffffffa037398e [xfs]
#10 [ffff8800a57bbce8] xfs_itruncate_extents at ffffffffa0391b29 [xfs]
#11 [ffff8800a57bbd88] xfs_inactive_truncate at ffffffffa0391d0c [xfs]
#12 [ffff8800a57bbdb8] xfs_inactive at ffffffffa0392508 [xfs]
#13 [ffff8800a57bbdd8] xfs_fs_evict_inode at ffffffffa035907e [xfs]
#14 [ffff8800a57bbe00] evict at ffffffff811e1b67
#15 [ffff8800a57bbe28] iput at ffffffff811e23a5
#16 [ffff8800a57bbe58] dentry_kill at ffffffff811dcfc8
#17 [ffff8800a57bbe88] dput at ffffffff811dd06c
#18 [ffff8800a57bbea8] __fput at ffffffff811c823b
#19 [ffff8800a57bbef0] ____fput at ffffffff811c846e
#20 [ffff8800a57bbf00] task_work_run at ffffffff81093b27
#21 [ffff8800a57bbf30] do_notify_resume at ffffffff81013b0c
#22 [ffff8800a57bbf50] int_signal at ffffffff8161405d

As it turns out, this is because the i_itemp pointer, along
with the d_ops pointer, has been overwritten with zeros
when we tear down the extents during truncate.  When the in-core
inode fork on the temporary inode used by xfs_fsr was originally
set up during the extent swap, we mistakenly looked at di_nextents
to determine whether all extents fit inline, but this misses extents
generated by speculative preallocation; we should be using if_bytes
instead.

This mistake corrupts the in-memory inode, and code in
xfs_iext_remove_inline eventually gets bad inputs, causing
it to memmove and memset incorrect ranges; this became apparent
because the two values in ifp->if_u2.if_inline_ext[1] contained
what should have been in d_ops and i_itemp; they were memmoved due
to incorrect array indexing and then the original locations
were zeroed with memset, again due to an array overrun.

Fix this by properly using i_df.if_bytes to determine the number
of extents, not di_nextents.

Thanks to dchinner for looking at this with me and spotting the
root cause.

Signed-off-by: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Brian Foster <bfoster@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
vchong pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 5, 2018
[ Upstream commit 373c83a ]

Using built-in in kernel image without a firmware in filesystem
or in the kernel image can lead to a kernel NULL pointer deference.
Watchdog need to be stopped in brcmf_sdio_remove

The system is going down NOW!
[ 1348.110759] Unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at virtual address 000002f8
Sent SIGTERM to all processes
[ 1348.121412] Mem abort info:
[ 1348.126962]   ESR = 0x96000004
[ 1348.130023]   Exception class = DABT (current EL), IL = 32 bits
[ 1348.135948]   SET = 0, FnV = 0
[ 1348.138997]   EA = 0, S1PTW = 0
[ 1348.142154] Data abort info:
[ 1348.145045]   ISV = 0, ISS = 0x00000004
[ 1348.148884]   CM = 0, WnR = 0
[ 1348.151861] user pgtable: 4k pages, 48-bit VAs, pgdp = (____ptrval____)
[ 1348.158475] [00000000000002f8] pgd=0000000000000000
[ 1348.163364] Internal error: Oops: 96000004 [#1] PREEMPT SMP
[ 1348.168927] Modules linked in: ipv6
[ 1348.172421] CPU: 3 PID: 1421 Comm: brcmf_wdog/mmc0 Not tainted 4.17.0-rc5-next-20180517 #18
[ 1348.180757] Hardware name: Amarula A64-Relic (DT)
[ 1348.185455] pstate: 60000005 (nZCv daif -PAN -UAO)
[ 1348.190251] pc : brcmf_sdiod_freezer_count+0x0/0x20
[ 1348.195124] lr : brcmf_sdio_watchdog_thread+0x64/0x290
[ 1348.200253] sp : ffff00000b85be30
[ 1348.203561] x29: ffff00000b85be30 x28: 0000000000000000
[ 1348.208868] x27: ffff00000b6cb918 x26: ffff80003b990638
[ 1348.214176] x25: ffff0000087b1a20 x24: ffff80003b94f800
[ 1348.219483] x23: ffff000008e620c8 x22: ffff000008f0b660
[ 1348.224790] x21: ffff000008c6a858 x20: 00000000fffffe00
[ 1348.230097] x19: ffff80003b94f800 x18: 0000000000000001
[ 1348.235404] x17: 0000ffffab2e8a74 x16: ffff0000080d7de8
[ 1348.240711] x15: 0000000000000000 x14: 0000000000000400
[ 1348.246018] x13: 0000000000000400 x12: 0000000000000001
[ 1348.251324] x11: 00000000000002c4 x10: 0000000000000a10
[ 1348.256631] x9 : ffff00000b85bc40 x8 : ffff80003be11870
[ 1348.261937] x7 : ffff80003dfc7308 x6 : 000000078ff08b55
[ 1348.267243] x5 : 00000139e1058400 x4 : 0000000000000000
[ 1348.272550] x3 : dead000000000100 x2 : 958f2788d6618100
[ 1348.277856] x1 : 00000000fffffe00 x0 : 0000000000000000

Signed-off-by: Michael Trimarchi <michael@amarulasolutions.com>
Acked-by: Arend van Spriel <arend.vanspriel@broadcom.com>
Tested-by: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <alexander.levin@microsoft.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
vchong pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 5, 2018
commit a5ba1d9 upstream.

We have reports of the following crash:

    PID: 7 TASK: ffff88085c6d61c0 CPU: 1 COMMAND: "kworker/u25:0"
    #0 [ffff88085c6db710] machine_kexec at ffffffff81046239
    #1 [ffff88085c6db760] crash_kexec at ffffffff810fc248
    #2 [ffff88085c6db830] oops_end at ffffffff81008ae7
    #3 [ffff88085c6db860] no_context at ffffffff81050b8f
    #4 [ffff88085c6db8b0] __bad_area_nosemaphore at ffffffff81050d75
    #5 [ffff88085c6db900] bad_area_nosemaphore at ffffffff81050e83
    #6 [ffff88085c6db910] __do_page_fault at ffffffff8105132e
    #7 [ffff88085c6db9b0] do_page_fault at ffffffff8105152c
    #8 [ffff88085c6db9c0] page_fault at ffffffff81a3f122
    [exception RIP: uart_put_char+149]
    RIP: ffffffff814b67b5 RSP: ffff88085c6dba78 RFLAGS: 00010006
    RAX: 0000000000000292 RBX: ffffffff827c5120 RCX: 0000000000000081
    RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 000000000000005f RDI: ffffffff827c5120
    RBP: ffff88085c6dba98 R8: 000000000000012c R9: ffffffff822ea320
    R10: ffff88085fe4db04 R11: 0000000000000001 R12: ffff881059f9c000
    R13: 0000000000000001 R14: 000000000000005f R15: 0000000000000fba
    ORIG_RAX: ffffffffffffffff CS: 0010 SS: 0018
    #9 [ffff88085c6dbaa0] tty_put_char at ffffffff81497544
    #10 [ffff88085c6dbac0] do_output_char at ffffffff8149c91c
    #11 [ffff88085c6dbae0] __process_echoes at ffffffff8149cb8b
    #12 [ffff88085c6dbb30] commit_echoes at ffffffff8149cdc2
    #13 [ffff88085c6dbb60] n_tty_receive_buf_fast at ffffffff8149e49b
    #14 [ffff88085c6dbbc0] __receive_buf at ffffffff8149ef5a
    #15 [ffff88085c6dbc20] n_tty_receive_buf_common at ffffffff8149f016
    #16 [ffff88085c6dbca0] n_tty_receive_buf2 at ffffffff8149f194
    #17 [ffff88085c6dbcb0] flush_to_ldisc at ffffffff814a238a
    #18 [ffff88085c6dbd50] process_one_work at ffffffff81090be2
    #19 [ffff88085c6dbe20] worker_thread at ffffffff81091b4d
    #20 [ffff88085c6dbeb0] kthread at ffffffff81096384
    #21 [ffff88085c6dbf50] ret_from_fork at ffffffff81a3d69f​

after slogging through some dissasembly:

ffffffff814b6720 <uart_put_char>:
ffffffff814b6720:	55                   	push   %rbp
ffffffff814b6721:	48 89 e5             	mov    %rsp,%rbp
ffffffff814b6724:	48 83 ec 20          	sub    $0x20,%rsp
ffffffff814b6728:	48 89 1c 24          	mov    %rbx,(%rsp)
ffffffff814b672c:	4c 89 64 24 08       	mov    %r12,0x8(%rsp)
ffffffff814b6731:	4c 89 6c 24 10       	mov    %r13,0x10(%rsp)
ffffffff814b6736:	4c 89 74 24 18       	mov    %r14,0x18(%rsp)
ffffffff814b673b:	e8 b0 8e 58 00       	callq  ffffffff81a3f5f0 <mcount>
ffffffff814b6740:	4c 8b a7 88 02 00 00 	mov    0x288(%rdi),%r12
ffffffff814b6747:	45 31 ed             	xor    %r13d,%r13d
ffffffff814b674a:	41 89 f6             	mov    %esi,%r14d
ffffffff814b674d:	49 83 bc 24 70 01 00 	cmpq   $0x0,0x170(%r12)
ffffffff814b6754:	00 00
ffffffff814b6756:	49 8b 9c 24 80 01 00 	mov    0x180(%r12),%rbx
ffffffff814b675d:	00
ffffffff814b675e:	74 2f                	je     ffffffff814b678f <uart_put_char+0x6f>
ffffffff814b6760:	48 89 df             	mov    %rbx,%rdi
ffffffff814b6763:	e8 a8 67 58 00       	callq  ffffffff81a3cf10 <_raw_spin_lock_irqsave>
ffffffff814b6768:	41 8b 8c 24 78 01 00 	mov    0x178(%r12),%ecx
ffffffff814b676f:	00
ffffffff814b6770:	89 ca                	mov    %ecx,%edx
ffffffff814b6772:	f7 d2                	not    %edx
ffffffff814b6774:	41 03 94 24 7c 01 00 	add    0x17c(%r12),%edx
ffffffff814b677b:	00
ffffffff814b677c:	81 e2 ff 0f 00 00    	and    $0xfff,%edx
ffffffff814b6782:	75 23                	jne    ffffffff814b67a7 <uart_put_char+0x87>
ffffffff814b6784:	48 89 c6             	mov    %rax,%rsi
ffffffff814b6787:	48 89 df             	mov    %rbx,%rdi
ffffffff814b678a:	e8 e1 64 58 00       	callq  ffffffff81a3cc70 <_raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore>
ffffffff814b678f:	44 89 e8             	mov    %r13d,%eax
ffffffff814b6792:	48 8b 1c 24          	mov    (%rsp),%rbx
ffffffff814b6796:	4c 8b 64 24 08       	mov    0x8(%rsp),%r12
ffffffff814b679b:	4c 8b 6c 24 10       	mov    0x10(%rsp),%r13
ffffffff814b67a0:	4c 8b 74 24 18       	mov    0x18(%rsp),%r14
ffffffff814b67a5:	c9                   	leaveq
ffffffff814b67a6:	c3                   	retq
ffffffff814b67a7:	49 8b 94 24 70 01 00 	mov    0x170(%r12),%rdx
ffffffff814b67ae:	00
ffffffff814b67af:	48 63 c9             	movslq %ecx,%rcx
ffffffff814b67b2:	41 b5 01             	mov    $0x1,%r13b
ffffffff814b67b5:	44 88 34 0a          	mov    %r14b,(%rdx,%rcx,1)
ffffffff814b67b9:	41 8b 94 24 78 01 00 	mov    0x178(%r12),%edx
ffffffff814b67c0:	00
ffffffff814b67c1:	83 c2 01             	add    $0x1,%edx
ffffffff814b67c4:	81 e2 ff 0f 00 00    	and    $0xfff,%edx
ffffffff814b67ca:	41 89 94 24 78 01 00 	mov    %edx,0x178(%r12)
ffffffff814b67d1:	00
ffffffff814b67d2:	eb b0                	jmp    ffffffff814b6784 <uart_put_char+0x64>
ffffffff814b67d4:	66 66 66 2e 0f 1f 84 	data32 data32 nopw %cs:0x0(%rax,%rax,1)
ffffffff814b67db:	00 00 00 00 00

for our build, this is crashing at:

    circ->buf[circ->head] = c;

Looking in uart_port_startup(), it seems that circ->buf (state->xmit.buf)
protected by the "per-port mutex", which based on uart_port_check() is
state->port.mutex. Indeed, the lock acquired in uart_put_char() is
uport->lock, i.e. not the same lock.

Anyway, since the lock is not acquired, if uart_shutdown() is called, the
last chunk of that function may release state->xmit.buf before its assigned
to null, and cause the race above.

To fix it, let's lock uport->lock when allocating/deallocating
state->xmit.buf in addition to the per-port mutex.

v2: switch to locking uport->lock on allocation/deallocation instead of
    locking the per-port mutex in uart_put_char. Note that since
    uport->lock is a spin lock, we have to switch the allocation to
    GFP_ATOMIC.
v3: move the allocation outside the lock, so we can switch back to
    GFP_KERNEL

Signed-off-by: Tycho Andersen <tycho@tycho.ws>
Cc: stable <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
odeprez pushed a commit to odeprez/linux-swg that referenced this pull request Oct 9, 2023
The following call trace shows a deadlock issue due to recursive locking of
mutex "device_mutex". First lock acquire is in target_for_each_device() and
second in target_free_device().

 PID: 148266   TASK: ffff8be21ffb5d00  CPU: 10   COMMAND: "iscsi_ttx"
  #0 [ffffa2bfc9ec3b18] __schedule at ffffffffa8060e7f
  linaro-swg#1 [ffffa2bfc9ec3ba0] schedule at ffffffffa8061224
  linaro-swg#2 [ffffa2bfc9ec3bb8] schedule_preempt_disabled at ffffffffa80615ee
  linaro-swg#3 [ffffa2bfc9ec3bc8] __mutex_lock at ffffffffa8062fd7
  linaro-swg#4 [ffffa2bfc9ec3c40] __mutex_lock_slowpath at ffffffffa80631d3
  linaro-swg#5 [ffffa2bfc9ec3c50] mutex_lock at ffffffffa806320c
  linaro-swg#6 [ffffa2bfc9ec3c68] target_free_device at ffffffffc0935998 [target_core_mod]
  linaro-swg#7 [ffffa2bfc9ec3c90] target_core_dev_release at ffffffffc092f975 [target_core_mod]
  linaro-swg#8 [ffffa2bfc9ec3ca0] config_item_put at ffffffffa79d250f
  linaro-swg#9 [ffffa2bfc9ec3cd0] config_item_put at ffffffffa79d2583
 linaro-swg#10 [ffffa2bfc9ec3ce0] target_devices_idr_iter at ffffffffc0933f3a [target_core_mod]
 linaro-swg#11 [ffffa2bfc9ec3d00] idr_for_each at ffffffffa803f6fc
 linaro-swg#12 [ffffa2bfc9ec3d60] target_for_each_device at ffffffffc0935670 [target_core_mod]
 linaro-swg#13 [ffffa2bfc9ec3d98] transport_deregister_session at ffffffffc0946408 [target_core_mod]
 linaro-swg#14 [ffffa2bfc9ec3dc8] iscsit_close_session at ffffffffc09a44a6 [iscsi_target_mod]
 linaro-swg#15 [ffffa2bfc9ec3df0] iscsit_close_connection at ffffffffc09a4a88 [iscsi_target_mod]
 linaro-swg#16 [ffffa2bfc9ec3df8] finish_task_switch at ffffffffa76e5d07
 linaro-swg#17 [ffffa2bfc9ec3e78] iscsit_take_action_for_connection_exit at ffffffffc0991c23 [iscsi_target_mod]
 linaro-swg#18 [ffffa2bfc9ec3ea0] iscsi_target_tx_thread at ffffffffc09a403b [iscsi_target_mod]
 linaro-swg#19 [ffffa2bfc9ec3f08] kthread at ffffffffa76d8080
 linaro-swg#20 [ffffa2bfc9ec3f50] ret_from_fork at ffffffffa8200364

Fixes: 36d4cb4 ("scsi: target: Avoid that EXTENDED COPY commands trigger lock inversion")
Signed-off-by: Junxiao Bi <junxiao.bi@oracle.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230918225848.66463-1-junxiao.bi@oracle.com
Reviewed-by: Mike Christie <michael.christie@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Martin K. Petersen <martin.petersen@oracle.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants