Skip to content

Conversation

@vim-zz
Copy link
Collaborator

@vim-zz vim-zz commented Jul 22, 2025

Screenshot 2025-07-22 at 18 32 15

✨ PR Description

Purpose: Enhance gitStream documentation with iterative guidelines workflow and improve organization of file exclusion information.

Main changes:

  • Added workflow section for iterative guidelines refinement using the Playground
  • Reorganized guidelines loading documentation into a structured table format
  • Improved file exclusions section by moving it to a collapsible element for better readability

Generated by LinearB AI and added by gitStream.
AI-generated content may contain inaccuracies. Please verify before using. We'd love your feedback! 🚀

@vim-zz vim-zz requested a review from MishaKav July 22, 2025 15:33
Copy link

@orca-security-us orca-security-us bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Orca Security Scan Summary

Status Check Issues by priority
Passed Passed Infrastructure as Code high 0   medium 0   low 0   info 0 View in Orca
Passed Passed SAST high 0   medium 0   low 0   info 0 View in Orca
Passed Passed Secrets high 0   medium 0   low 0   info 0 View in Orca
Passed Passed Vulnerabilities high 0   medium 0   low 0   info 0 View in Orca

@vim-zz vim-zz requested a review from HeatherHazell July 22, 2025 15:33
@gitstream-cm
Copy link
Contributor

gitstream-cm bot commented Jul 22, 2025

Please mark which AI tools you used for this PR by checking the appropriate boxes:

  • GitHub Copilot
  • Cursor
  • ChatGPT
  • Tabnine
  • JetBrains AI Assistant
  • VSCode IntelliCode
  • Claude
  • Gemini
  • Other AI tool
  • No AI tools were used

Tip: If you want to avoid this comment in the future, you can add a label of the format 🤖 ai-* when creating your PR.

Copy link
Contributor

@gitstream-cm gitstream-cm bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

✨ PR Review

The PR enhances documentation structure with better organization and adds helpful workflow guidance. However, there's a content accuracy issue in the lock files categorization.

1 issues detected:

🧾 Readability - Build configuration files are incorrectly labeled as lock files in the documentation table.

Details: Several files in the lock files table are incorrectly categorized as lock files when they are actually build configuration files. This could mislead users about which files are excluded from AI review and their actual purpose.
File: docs/automation-actions.md

Generated by LinearB AI and added by gitStream.
AI-generated content may contain inaccuracies. Please verify before using. We'd love your feedback! 🚀

@gitstream-cm gitstream-cm bot requested a review from a team July 22, 2025 15:35
@vim-zz vim-zz merged commit 14567a3 into main Jul 22, 2025
14 checks passed
@vim-zz vim-zz deleted the add-gudelines-tuning-flow branch July 22, 2025 15:36
@MishaKav
Copy link
Collaborator

I think we can't put guidelines: {{ "./REVIEW_RULES.md" | readFile() | dump }}
we should assign this to variable first: REVIEW_RULES: {{ "./REVIEW_RULES.md" | readFile() | dump }} and then pass to guidelines

#753

@shaked-hadas
Copy link

I think we can't put guidelines: {{ "./REVIEW_RULES.md" | readFile() | dump }} we should assign this to variable first: REVIEW_RULES: {{ "./REVIEW_RULES.md" | readFile() | dump }} and then pass to guidelines

#753

I've tried that also, and it still didn't work, throws the same error

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants