Skip to content

Conversation

@spetrosi
Copy link
Contributor

This change is for running tests in Testing Farm CI. This is a replacement for
BaseOS CI that we are currently using. Running it Testing Farm gives us more
control.

It adds a workflow for running tests, and a plans directory containing a test
plan and a README-plans.md with some info.

Note that this workflow runs from the main branch. This means that changes to
the workflow must be merged to main, then pull requests will be able to run it.
This is because the workflow uses on: issue_comment context, this is a security
measure recommended by GitHub. It saves us from leaking organization secrets.

The functionality is WIP, so await future fixes and updates.

Signed-off-by: Sergei Petrosian spetrosi@redhat.com

@spetrosi spetrosi requested a review from richm as a code owner July 24, 2024 15:55
@spetrosi spetrosi force-pushed the ci-testingfarm-tests branch from 0555f3f to d7d1611 Compare July 24, 2024 20:12
This change is for running tests in Testing Farm CI. This is a replacement for
BaseOS CI that we are currently using. Running it Testing Farm gives us more
control.

It adds a workflow for running tests, and a plans directory containing a test
plan and a README-plans.md with some info.

Note that this workflow runs from the main branch. This means that changes to
the workflow must be merged to main, then pull requests will be able to run it.
This is because the workflow uses on: issue_comment context, this is a security
measure recommended by GitHub. It saves us from leaking organization secrets.

The functionality is WIP, so await future fixes and updates.

Signed-off-by: Sergei Petrosian <spetrosi@redhat.com>
@spetrosi spetrosi force-pushed the ci-testingfarm-tests branch from d7d1611 to 7562a0d Compare July 25, 2024 08:13
@spetrosi spetrosi merged commit 3d2e312 into main Jul 25, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants