clang-format mis-annotates pointer/reference in range-based `for` loops

[owenca]

This is split from #60146 and reported by @jeremyong.

I'm seeing this also with an even simpler repro:

for (int i = 0; Foo& foo : foos)

turns into

for (int i = 0; Foo & foo : foos)

even with PointerAlignment: Left. I am assuming that in the presence of scoped declaration statements, subsequent & operators are parsed as bitwise-and operators.

[llvmbot]

@llvm/issue-subscribers-clang-format

Author: Owen Pan (owenca)

This is split from #60146 and reported by @jeremyong.

> I'm seeing this also with an even simpler repro:
>
> c++ > for (int i = 0; Foo& foo : foos) >
>
> turns into
>
> c++ > for (int i = 0; Foo & foo : foos) >
>
> even with PointerAlignment: Left. I am assuming that in the presence of scoped declaration statements, subsequent & operators are parsed as bitwise-and operators.