-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 14.9k
[clang][Driver][HIP] Change OffloadingActionBuilder to respect the --no-gpu-bundle-output flag #163834
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
…no-gpu-bundle-output flag
Thank you for submitting a Pull Request (PR) to the LLVM Project! This PR will be automatically labeled and the relevant teams will be notified. If you wish to, you can add reviewers by using the "Reviewers" section on this page. If this is not working for you, it is probably because you do not have write permissions for the repository. In which case you can instead tag reviewers by name in a comment by using If you have received no comments on your PR for a week, you can request a review by "ping"ing the PR by adding a comment “Ping”. The common courtesy "ping" rate is once a week. Please remember that you are asking for valuable time from other developers. If you have further questions, they may be answered by the LLVM GitHub User Guide. You can also ask questions in a comment on this PR, on the LLVM Discord or on the forums. |
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang-driver @llvm/pr-subscribers-clang Author: alessandra simmons (MixedMatched) ChangesCurrently, the command
This doesn't match my expectation of the behavior of Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/163834.diff 2 Files Affected:
diff --git a/clang/lib/Driver/Driver.cpp b/clang/lib/Driver/Driver.cpp
index 40ea513e85427..02cfc4314bbc4 100644
--- a/clang/lib/Driver/Driver.cpp
+++ b/clang/lib/Driver/Driver.cpp
@@ -3844,6 +3844,9 @@ class OffloadingActionBuilder final {
/// Flag set to true if all valid builders allow file bundling/unbundling.
bool CanUseBundler;
+ /// Flag set to false if an argument turns off bundling.
+ bool ShouldUseBundler;
+
public:
OffloadingActionBuilder(Compilation &C, DerivedArgList &Args,
const Driver::InputList &Inputs)
@@ -3878,6 +3881,9 @@ class OffloadingActionBuilder final {
}
CanUseBundler =
ValidBuilders && ValidBuilders == ValidBuildersSupportingBundling;
+
+ ShouldUseBundler = Args.hasFlag(options::OPT_gpu_bundle_output,
+ options::OPT_no_gpu_bundle_output, true);
}
~OffloadingActionBuilder() {
@@ -4029,11 +4035,11 @@ class OffloadingActionBuilder final {
SB->appendTopLevelActions(OffloadAL);
}
- // If we can use the bundler, replace the host action by the bundling one in
- // the resulting list. Otherwise, just append the device actions. For
- // device only compilation, HostAction is a null pointer, therefore only do
- // this when HostAction is not a null pointer.
- if (CanUseBundler && HostAction &&
+ // If we can and should use the bundler, replace the host action by the
+ // bundling one in the resulting list. Otherwise, just append the device
+ // actions. For device only compilation, HostAction is a null pointer,
+ // therefore only do this when HostAction is not a null pointer.
+ if (CanUseBundler && ShouldUseBundler && HostAction &&
HostAction->getType() != types::TY_Nothing && !OffloadAL.empty()) {
// Add the host action to the list in order to create the bundling action.
OffloadAL.push_back(HostAction);
diff --git a/clang/test/Driver/no-gpu-bundle-respected.hip b/clang/test/Driver/no-gpu-bundle-respected.hip
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000..1587551f0322d
--- /dev/null
+++ b/clang/test/Driver/no-gpu-bundle-respected.hip
@@ -0,0 +1,18 @@
+// RUN: %clang -ccc-print-phases -c -emit-llvm \
+// RUN: --offload-arch=gfx900,gfx1030 -O3 -x hip %s \
+// RUN: 2>&1 | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=OFFLOAD
+
+// RUN: %clang -ccc-print-phases -c -emit-llvm \
+// RUN: --gpu-bundle-output --offload-arch=gfx900,gfx1030 -O3 -x hip %s \
+// RUN: 2>&1 | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=OFFLOAD
+
+// RUN: %clang -ccc-print-phases -c -emit-llvm \
+// RUN: --no-gpu-bundle-output --offload-arch=gfx900,gfx1030 -O3 -x hip %s \
+// RUN: 2>&1 | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=OFFLOAD2
+
+// OFFLOAD: clang-offload-bundler
+// OFFLOAD2-NOT: clang-offload-bundler
+
+int square(int num) {
+ return num * num;
+}
|
|
1 similar comment
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
lgtm, seems reasonable to not unbundle when --no-gpu-bundle-output is specified
Can you wait a day or two before landing to see if any other reviewer has feedback? Thanks!
// RUN: 2>&1 | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=OFFLOAD2 | ||
|
||
// OFFLOAD: clang-offload-bundler | ||
// OFFLOAD2-NOT: clang-offload-bundler |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
use a meaningful check line, e.g. BUNDLE, NOBUNDLE. also check the action entries for the NOBUNDLE case.
Currently, the command
clang -c -emit-llvm --no-gpu-bundle-output --offload-arch=gfx900,gfx1030 -O3 -x hip square.hip
will lead to a bundled output:This doesn't match my expectation of the behavior of
--no-gpu-bundle-output
, so this adds a check into OffloadingActionBuilder for the flag when replacing the host compile action for a bundling action.