[DA] Add option to enable specific dependence test only #164245

kasuga-fj · 2025-10-20T12:13:34Z

PR #157084 added an option da-run-siv-routines-only to run only SIV routines in DA. This PR replaces that option with a more fine-grained one that allows to select other than SIV routines as well. This option is useful for regression testing of individual DA routines. This patch also reorganizes regression tests that use da-run-siv-routines-only.

kasuga-fj · 2025-10-20T12:13:51Z

This stack of pull requests is managed by Graphite. Learn more about stacking.

kasuga-fj · 2025-10-20T12:37:45Z

llvm/test/Analysis/DependenceAnalysis/ExactSIV.ll

-; RUN: opt < %s -disable-output "-passes=print<da>" -da-run-siv-routines-only 2>&1 \
-; RUN: | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=CHECK-SIV-ONLY


This check was originally added in #157085, primarily for @exact14 and @exact15. Since this patch relocates those tests to a separate file, the check is no longer particularly meaningful.

llvmbot · 2025-10-20T12:39:34Z

@llvm/pr-subscribers-llvm-analysis

Author: Ryotaro Kasuga (kasuga-fj)

Changes

PR #157084 added an option da-run-siv-routines-only to run only SIV routines in DA. This PR replaces that option with a more fine-grained one that allows to select other than SIV routines as well. This option is useful for regression testing of individual DA routines. This patch also reorganizes regression tests that use da-run-siv-routines-only.

Patch is 40.25 KiB, truncated to 20.00 KiB below, full version: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/164245.diff

4 Files Affected:

(modified) llvm/lib/Analysis/DependenceAnalysis.cpp (+73-9)
(modified) llvm/test/Analysis/DependenceAnalysis/ExactSIV.ll (-318)
(added) llvm/test/Analysis/DependenceAnalysis/exact-siv-overflow.ll (+124)
(added) llvm/test/Analysis/DependenceAnalysis/run-specific-dependence-test.ll (+73)

diff --git a/llvm/lib/Analysis/DependenceAnalysis.cpp b/llvm/lib/Analysis/DependenceAnalysis.cpp
index 805b6820e1e1c..b155dd11066b8 100644
--- a/llvm/lib/Analysis/DependenceAnalysis.cpp
+++ b/llvm/lib/Analysis/DependenceAnalysis.cpp
@@ -122,11 +122,49 @@ static cl::opt<unsigned> MIVMaxLevelThreshold(
     cl::desc("Maximum depth allowed for the recursive algorithm used to "
              "explore MIV direction vectors."));
 
-static cl::opt<bool> RunSIVRoutinesOnly(
-    "da-run-siv-routines-only", cl::init(false), cl::ReallyHidden,
-    cl::desc("Run only SIV routines and disable others (ZIV, RDIV, and MIV). "
-             "The purpose is mainly to exclude the influence of those routines "
-             "in regression tests for SIV routines."));
+namespace {
+
+/// Types of dependence test routines.
+enum class DependenceTestType {
+  All,
+  StrongSIV,
+  WeakCrossingSIV,
+  ExactSIV,
+  WeakZeroSIV,
+  ExactRDIV,
+  SymbolicRDIV,
+  GCDMIV,
+  BanerjeeMIV,
+};
+
+} // anonymous namespace
+
+static cl::opt<DependenceTestType> EnableDependenceTest(
+    "da-enable-dependence-test", cl::init(DependenceTestType::All),
+    cl::ReallyHidden,
+    cl::desc("Run only specified dependence test routine and disable others. "
+             "The purpose is mainly to exclude the influence of other "
+             "dependence test routines in regression tests. If set to All, all "
+             "dependence test routines are enabled."),
+    cl::values(clEnumValN(DependenceTestType::All, "all",
+                          "Enable all dependence test routines."),
+               clEnumValN(DependenceTestType::StrongSIV, "strong-siv",
+                          "Enable only Strong SIV test."),
+               clEnumValN(DependenceTestType::WeakCrossingSIV,
+                          "weak-crossing-siv",
+                          "Enable only Weak-Crossing SIV test."),
+               clEnumValN(DependenceTestType::ExactSIV, "exact-siv",
+                          "Enable only Exact SIV test."),
+               clEnumValN(DependenceTestType::WeakZeroSIV, "weak-zero-siv",
+                          "Enable only Weak-Zero SIV test."),
+               clEnumValN(DependenceTestType::ExactRDIV, "exact-rdiv",
+                          "Enable only Exact RDIV test."),
+               clEnumValN(DependenceTestType::SymbolicRDIV, "symbolic-rdiv",
+                          "Enable only Symbolic RDIV test."),
+               clEnumValN(DependenceTestType::GCDMIV, "gcd-miv",
+                          "Enable only GCD MIV test."),
+               clEnumValN(DependenceTestType::BanerjeeMIV, "banerjee-miv",
+                          "Enable only Banerjee MIV test.")));
 
 //===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
 // basics
@@ -1273,6 +1311,13 @@ static const SCEV *minusSCEVNoSignedOverflow(const SCEV *A, const SCEV *B,
   return nullptr;
 }
 
+/// Returns true iff \p Test is enabled.
+static bool isDependenceTestEnabled(DependenceTestType Test) {
+  if (EnableDependenceTest == DependenceTestType::All)
+    return true;
+  return EnableDependenceTest == Test;
+}
+
 // testZIV -
 // When we have a pair of subscripts of the form [c1] and [c2],
 // where c1 and c2 are both loop invariant, we attack it using
@@ -1334,6 +1379,9 @@ bool DependenceInfo::strongSIVtest(const SCEV *Coeff, const SCEV *SrcConst,
                                    const Loop *CurDstLoop, unsigned Level,
                                    FullDependence &Result,
                                    Constraint &NewConstraint) const {
+  if (!isDependenceTestEnabled(DependenceTestType::StrongSIV))
+    return false;
+
   LLVM_DEBUG(dbgs() << "\tStrong SIV test\n");
   LLVM_DEBUG(dbgs() << "\t    Coeff = " << *Coeff);
   LLVM_DEBUG(dbgs() << ", " << *Coeff->getType() << "\n");
@@ -1468,6 +1516,9 @@ bool DependenceInfo::weakCrossingSIVtest(
     const Loop *CurSrcLoop, const Loop *CurDstLoop, unsigned Level,
     FullDependence &Result, Constraint &NewConstraint,
     const SCEV *&SplitIter) const {
+  if (!isDependenceTestEnabled(DependenceTestType::WeakCrossingSIV))
+    return false;
+
   LLVM_DEBUG(dbgs() << "\tWeak-Crossing SIV test\n");
   LLVM_DEBUG(dbgs() << "\t    Coeff = " << *Coeff << "\n");
   LLVM_DEBUG(dbgs() << "\t    SrcConst = " << *SrcConst << "\n");
@@ -1726,6 +1777,9 @@ bool DependenceInfo::exactSIVtest(const SCEV *SrcCoeff, const SCEV *DstCoeff,
                                   const Loop *CurDstLoop, unsigned Level,
                                   FullDependence &Result,
                                   Constraint &NewConstraint) const {
+  if (!isDependenceTestEnabled(DependenceTestType::ExactSIV))
+    return false;
+
   LLVM_DEBUG(dbgs() << "\tExact SIV test\n");
   LLVM_DEBUG(dbgs() << "\t    SrcCoeff = " << *SrcCoeff << " = AM\n");
   LLVM_DEBUG(dbgs() << "\t    DstCoeff = " << *DstCoeff << " = BM\n");
@@ -1905,6 +1959,9 @@ bool DependenceInfo::weakZeroSrcSIVtest(
     const SCEV *DstCoeff, const SCEV *SrcConst, const SCEV *DstConst,
     const Loop *CurSrcLoop, const Loop *CurDstLoop, unsigned Level,
     FullDependence &Result, Constraint &NewConstraint) const {
+  if (!isDependenceTestEnabled(DependenceTestType::WeakZeroSIV))
+    return false;
+
   // For the WeakSIV test, it's possible the loop isn't common to
   // the Src and Dst loops. If it isn't, then there's no need to
   // record a direction.
@@ -2013,6 +2070,9 @@ bool DependenceInfo::weakZeroDstSIVtest(
     const SCEV *SrcCoeff, const SCEV *SrcConst, const SCEV *DstConst,
     const Loop *CurSrcLoop, const Loop *CurDstLoop, unsigned Level,
     FullDependence &Result, Constraint &NewConstraint) const {
+  if (!isDependenceTestEnabled(DependenceTestType::WeakZeroSIV))
+    return false;
+
   // For the WeakSIV test, it's possible the loop isn't common to the
   // Src and Dst loops. If it isn't, then there's no need to record a direction.
   LLVM_DEBUG(dbgs() << "\tWeak-Zero (dst) SIV test\n");
@@ -2096,8 +2156,9 @@ bool DependenceInfo::exactRDIVtest(const SCEV *SrcCoeff, const SCEV *DstCoeff,
                                    const SCEV *SrcConst, const SCEV *DstConst,
                                    const Loop *SrcLoop, const Loop *DstLoop,
                                    FullDependence &Result) const {
-  if (RunSIVRoutinesOnly)
+  if (!isDependenceTestEnabled(DependenceTestType::ExactRDIV))
     return false;
+
   LLVM_DEBUG(dbgs() << "\tExact RDIV test\n");
   LLVM_DEBUG(dbgs() << "\t    SrcCoeff = " << *SrcCoeff << " = AM\n");
   LLVM_DEBUG(dbgs() << "\t    DstCoeff = " << *DstCoeff << " = BM\n");
@@ -2242,8 +2303,9 @@ bool DependenceInfo::symbolicRDIVtest(const SCEV *A1, const SCEV *A2,
                                       const SCEV *C1, const SCEV *C2,
                                       const Loop *Loop1,
                                       const Loop *Loop2) const {
-  if (RunSIVRoutinesOnly)
+  if (!isDependenceTestEnabled(DependenceTestType::SymbolicRDIV))
     return false;
+
   ++SymbolicRDIVapplications;
   LLVM_DEBUG(dbgs() << "\ttry symbolic RDIV test\n");
   LLVM_DEBUG(dbgs() << "\t    A1 = " << *A1);
@@ -2557,8 +2619,9 @@ bool DependenceInfo::accumulateCoefficientsGCD(const SCEV *Expr,
 // to "a common divisor".
 bool DependenceInfo::gcdMIVtest(const SCEV *Src, const SCEV *Dst,
                                 FullDependence &Result) const {
-  if (RunSIVRoutinesOnly)
+  if (!isDependenceTestEnabled(DependenceTestType::GCDMIV))
     return false;
+
   LLVM_DEBUG(dbgs() << "starting gcd\n");
   ++GCDapplications;
   unsigned BitWidth = SE->getTypeSizeInBits(Src->getType());
@@ -2725,8 +2788,9 @@ bool DependenceInfo::gcdMIVtest(const SCEV *Src, const SCEV *Dst,
 bool DependenceInfo::banerjeeMIVtest(const SCEV *Src, const SCEV *Dst,
                                      const SmallBitVector &Loops,
                                      FullDependence &Result) const {
-  if (RunSIVRoutinesOnly)
+  if (!isDependenceTestEnabled(DependenceTestType::BanerjeeMIV))
     return false;
+
   LLVM_DEBUG(dbgs() << "starting Banerjee\n");
   ++BanerjeeApplications;
   LLVM_DEBUG(dbgs() << "    Src = " << *Src << '\n');
diff --git a/llvm/test/Analysis/DependenceAnalysis/ExactSIV.ll b/llvm/test/Analysis/DependenceAnalysis/ExactSIV.ll
index e8e7cb11bb23e..b6b44ad4bfc53 100644
--- a/llvm/test/Analysis/DependenceAnalysis/ExactSIV.ll
+++ b/llvm/test/Analysis/DependenceAnalysis/ExactSIV.ll
@@ -1,8 +1,6 @@
 ; NOTE: Assertions have been autogenerated by utils/update_analyze_test_checks.py UTC_ARGS: --version 5
 ; RUN: opt < %s -disable-output "-passes=print<da>" -aa-pipeline=basic-aa 2>&1 \
 ; RUN: | FileCheck %s
-; RUN: opt < %s -disable-output "-passes=print<da>" -da-run-siv-routines-only 2>&1 \
-; RUN: | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=CHECK-SIV-ONLY
 
 target datalayout = "e-p:64:64:64-i1:8:8-i8:8:8-i16:16:16-i32:32:32-i64:64:64-f32:32:32-f64:64:64-v64:64:64-v128:128:128-a0:0:64-s0:64:64-f80:128:128-n8:16:32:64-S128"
 target triple = "x86_64-apple-macosx10.6.0"
@@ -27,20 +25,6 @@ define void @exact0(ptr %A, ptr %B) nounwind uwtable ssp {
 ; CHECK-NEXT:  Src: store i32 %0, ptr %B.addr.01, align 4 --> Dst: store i32 %0, ptr %B.addr.01, align 4
 ; CHECK-NEXT:    da analyze - none!
 ;
-; CHECK-SIV-ONLY-LABEL: 'exact0'
-; CHECK-SIV-ONLY-NEXT:  Src: store i32 %conv, ptr %arrayidx, align 4 --> Dst: store i32 %conv, ptr %arrayidx, align 4
-; CHECK-SIV-ONLY-NEXT:    da analyze - none!
-; CHECK-SIV-ONLY-NEXT:  Src: store i32 %conv, ptr %arrayidx, align 4 --> Dst: %0 = load i32, ptr %arrayidx2, align 4
-; CHECK-SIV-ONLY-NEXT:    da analyze - flow [<=|<]!
-; CHECK-SIV-ONLY-NEXT:  Src: store i32 %conv, ptr %arrayidx, align 4 --> Dst: store i32 %0, ptr %B.addr.01, align 4
-; CHECK-SIV-ONLY-NEXT:    da analyze - confused!
-; CHECK-SIV-ONLY-NEXT:  Src: %0 = load i32, ptr %arrayidx2, align 4 --> Dst: %0 = load i32, ptr %arrayidx2, align 4
-; CHECK-SIV-ONLY-NEXT:    da analyze - none!
-; CHECK-SIV-ONLY-NEXT:  Src: %0 = load i32, ptr %arrayidx2, align 4 --> Dst: store i32 %0, ptr %B.addr.01, align 4
-; CHECK-SIV-ONLY-NEXT:    da analyze - confused!
-; CHECK-SIV-ONLY-NEXT:  Src: store i32 %0, ptr %B.addr.01, align 4 --> Dst: store i32 %0, ptr %B.addr.01, align 4
-; CHECK-SIV-ONLY-NEXT:    da analyze - none!
-;
 entry:
   br label %for.body
 
@@ -85,20 +69,6 @@ define void @exact1(ptr %A, ptr %B) nounwind uwtable ssp {
 ; CHECK-NEXT:  Src: store i32 %0, ptr %B.addr.01, align 4 --> Dst: store i32 %0, ptr %B.addr.01, align 4
 ; CHECK-NEXT:    da analyze - none!
 ;
-; CHECK-SIV-ONLY-LABEL: 'exact1'
-; CHECK-SIV-ONLY-NEXT:  Src: store i32 %conv, ptr %arrayidx, align 4 --> Dst: store i32 %conv, ptr %arrayidx, align 4
-; CHECK-SIV-ONLY-NEXT:    da analyze - none!
-; CHECK-SIV-ONLY-NEXT:  Src: store i32 %conv, ptr %arrayidx, align 4 --> Dst: %0 = load i32, ptr %arrayidx3, align 4
-; CHECK-SIV-ONLY-NEXT:    da analyze - none!
-; CHECK-SIV-ONLY-NEXT:  Src: store i32 %conv, ptr %arrayidx, align 4 --> Dst: store i32 %0, ptr %B.addr.01, align 4
-; CHECK-SIV-ONLY-NEXT:    da analyze - confused!
-; CHECK-SIV-ONLY-NEXT:  Src: %0 = load i32, ptr %arrayidx3, align 4 --> Dst: %0 = load i32, ptr %arrayidx3, align 4
-; CHECK-SIV-ONLY-NEXT:    da analyze - none!
-; CHECK-SIV-ONLY-NEXT:  Src: %0 = load i32, ptr %arrayidx3, align 4 --> Dst: store i32 %0, ptr %B.addr.01, align 4
-; CHECK-SIV-ONLY-NEXT:    da analyze - confused!
-; CHECK-SIV-ONLY-NEXT:  Src: store i32 %0, ptr %B.addr.01, align 4 --> Dst: store i32 %0, ptr %B.addr.01, align 4
-; CHECK-SIV-ONLY-NEXT:    da analyze - none!
-;
 entry:
   br label %for.body
 
@@ -144,20 +114,6 @@ define void @exact2(ptr %A, ptr %B) nounwind uwtable ssp {
 ; CHECK-NEXT:  Src: store i32 %0, ptr %B.addr.01, align 4 --> Dst: store i32 %0, ptr %B.addr.01, align 4
 ; CHECK-NEXT:    da analyze - none!
 ;
-; CHECK-SIV-ONLY-LABEL: 'exact2'
-; CHECK-SIV-ONLY-NEXT:  Src: store i32 %conv, ptr %arrayidx, align 4 --> Dst: store i32 %conv, ptr %arrayidx, align 4
-; CHECK-SIV-ONLY-NEXT:    da analyze - none!
-; CHECK-SIV-ONLY-NEXT:  Src: store i32 %conv, ptr %arrayidx, align 4 --> Dst: %0 = load i32, ptr %arrayidx1, align 4
-; CHECK-SIV-ONLY-NEXT:    da analyze - none!
-; CHECK-SIV-ONLY-NEXT:  Src: store i32 %conv, ptr %arrayidx, align 4 --> Dst: store i32 %0, ptr %B.addr.01, align 4
-; CHECK-SIV-ONLY-NEXT:    da analyze - confused!
-; CHECK-SIV-ONLY-NEXT:  Src: %0 = load i32, ptr %arrayidx1, align 4 --> Dst: %0 = load i32, ptr %arrayidx1, align 4
-; CHECK-SIV-ONLY-NEXT:    da analyze - none!
-; CHECK-SIV-ONLY-NEXT:  Src: %0 = load i32, ptr %arrayidx1, align 4 --> Dst: store i32 %0, ptr %B.addr.01, align 4
-; CHECK-SIV-ONLY-NEXT:    da analyze - confused!
-; CHECK-SIV-ONLY-NEXT:  Src: store i32 %0, ptr %B.addr.01, align 4 --> Dst: store i32 %0, ptr %B.addr.01, align 4
-; CHECK-SIV-ONLY-NEXT:    da analyze - none!
-;
 entry:
   br label %for.body
 
@@ -201,20 +157,6 @@ define void @exact3(ptr %A, ptr %B) nounwind uwtable ssp {
 ; CHECK-NEXT:  Src: store i32 %0, ptr %B.addr.01, align 4 --> Dst: store i32 %0, ptr %B.addr.01, align 4
 ; CHECK-NEXT:    da analyze - none!
 ;
-; CHECK-SIV-ONLY-LABEL: 'exact3'
-; CHECK-SIV-ONLY-NEXT:  Src: store i32 %conv, ptr %arrayidx, align 4 --> Dst: store i32 %conv, ptr %arrayidx, align 4
-; CHECK-SIV-ONLY-NEXT:    da analyze - none!
-; CHECK-SIV-ONLY-NEXT:  Src: store i32 %conv, ptr %arrayidx, align 4 --> Dst: %0 = load i32, ptr %arrayidx1, align 4
-; CHECK-SIV-ONLY-NEXT:    da analyze - flow [>]!
-; CHECK-SIV-ONLY-NEXT:  Src: store i32 %conv, ptr %arrayidx, align 4 --> Dst: store i32 %0, ptr %B.addr.01, align 4
-; CHECK-SIV-ONLY-NEXT:    da analyze - confused!
-; CHECK-SIV-ONLY-NEXT:  Src: %0 = load i32, ptr %arrayidx1, align 4 --> Dst: %0 = load i32, ptr %arrayidx1, align 4
-; CHECK-SIV-ONLY-NEXT:    da analyze - none!
-; CHECK-SIV-ONLY-NEXT:  Src: %0 = load i32, ptr %arrayidx1, align 4 --> Dst: store i32 %0, ptr %B.addr.01, align 4
-; CHECK-SIV-ONLY-NEXT:    da analyze - confused!
-; CHECK-SIV-ONLY-NEXT:  Src: store i32 %0, ptr %B.addr.01, align 4 --> Dst: store i32 %0, ptr %B.addr.01, align 4
-; CHECK-SIV-ONLY-NEXT:    da analyze - none!
-;
 entry:
   br label %for.body
 
@@ -258,20 +200,6 @@ define void @exact4(ptr %A, ptr %B) nounwind uwtable ssp {
 ; CHECK-NEXT:  Src: store i32 %0, ptr %B.addr.01, align 4 --> Dst: store i32 %0, ptr %B.addr.01, align 4
 ; CHECK-NEXT:    da analyze - none!
 ;
-; CHECK-SIV-ONLY-LABEL: 'exact4'
-; CHECK-SIV-ONLY-NEXT:  Src: store i32 %conv, ptr %arrayidx, align 4 --> Dst: store i32 %conv, ptr %arrayidx, align 4
-; CHECK-SIV-ONLY-NEXT:    da analyze - none!
-; CHECK-SIV-ONLY-NEXT:  Src: store i32 %conv, ptr %arrayidx, align 4 --> Dst: %0 = load i32, ptr %arrayidx1, align 4
-; CHECK-SIV-ONLY-NEXT:    da analyze - flow [>]!
-; CHECK-SIV-ONLY-NEXT:  Src: store i32 %conv, ptr %arrayidx, align 4 --> Dst: store i32 %0, ptr %B.addr.01, align 4
-; CHECK-SIV-ONLY-NEXT:    da analyze - confused!
-; CHECK-SIV-ONLY-NEXT:  Src: %0 = load i32, ptr %arrayidx1, align 4 --> Dst: %0 = load i32, ptr %arrayidx1, align 4
-; CHECK-SIV-ONLY-NEXT:    da analyze - none!
-; CHECK-SIV-ONLY-NEXT:  Src: %0 = load i32, ptr %arrayidx1, align 4 --> Dst: store i32 %0, ptr %B.addr.01, align 4
-; CHECK-SIV-ONLY-NEXT:    da analyze - confused!
-; CHECK-SIV-ONLY-NEXT:  Src: store i32 %0, ptr %B.addr.01, align 4 --> Dst: store i32 %0, ptr %B.addr.01, align 4
-; CHECK-SIV-ONLY-NEXT:    da analyze - none!
-;
 entry:
   br label %for.body
 
@@ -315,20 +243,6 @@ define void @exact5(ptr %A, ptr %B) nounwind uwtable ssp {
 ; CHECK-NEXT:  Src: store i32 %0, ptr %B.addr.01, align 4 --> Dst: store i32 %0, ptr %B.addr.01, align 4
 ; CHECK-NEXT:    da analyze - none!
 ;
-; CHECK-SIV-ONLY-LABEL: 'exact5'
-; CHECK-SIV-ONLY-NEXT:  Src: store i32 %conv, ptr %arrayidx, align 4 --> Dst: store i32 %conv, ptr %arrayidx, align 4
-; CHECK-SIV-ONLY-NEXT:    da analyze - none!
-; CHECK-SIV-ONLY-NEXT:  Src: store i32 %conv, ptr %arrayidx, align 4 --> Dst: %0 = load i32, ptr %arrayidx1, align 4
-; CHECK-SIV-ONLY-NEXT:    da analyze - flow [=>|<]!
-; CHECK-SIV-ONLY-NEXT:  Src: store i32 %conv, ptr %arrayidx, align 4 --> Dst: store i32 %0, ptr %B.addr.01, align 4
-; CHECK-SIV-ONLY-NEXT:    da analyze - confused!
-; CHECK-SIV-ONLY-NEXT:  Src: %0 = load i32, ptr %arrayidx1, align 4 --> Dst: %0 = load i32, ptr %arrayidx1, align 4
-; CHECK-SIV-ONLY-NEXT:    da analyze - none!
-; CHECK-SIV-ONLY-NEXT:  Src: %0 = load i32, ptr %arrayidx1, align 4 --> Dst: store i32 %0, ptr %B.addr.01, align 4
-; CHECK-SIV-ONLY-NEXT:    da analyze - confused!
-; CHECK-SIV-ONLY-NEXT:  Src: store i32 %0, ptr %B.addr.01, align 4 --> Dst: store i32 %0, ptr %B.addr.01, align 4
-; CHECK-SIV-ONLY-NEXT:    da analyze - none!
-;
 entry:
   br label %for.body
 
@@ -372,20 +286,6 @@ define void @exact6(ptr %A, ptr %B) nounwind uwtable ssp {
 ; CHECK-NEXT:  Src: store i32 %0, ptr %B.addr.01, align 4 --> Dst: store i32 %0, ptr %B.addr.01, align 4
 ; CHECK-NEXT:    da analyze - none!
 ;
-; CHECK-SIV-ONLY-LABEL: 'exact6'
-; CHECK-SIV-ONLY-NEXT:  Src: store i32 %conv, ptr %arrayidx, align 4 --> Dst: store i32 %conv, ptr %arrayidx, align 4
-; CHECK-SIV-ONLY-NEXT:    da analyze - none!
-; CHECK-SIV-ONLY-NEXT:  Src: store i32 %conv, ptr %arrayidx, align 4 --> Dst: %0 = load i32, ptr %arrayidx1, align 4
-; CHECK-SIV-ONLY-NEXT:    da analyze - flow [=>|<]!
-; CHECK-SIV-ONLY-NEXT:  Src: store i32 %conv, ptr %arrayidx, align 4 --> Dst: store i32 %0, ptr %B.addr.01, align 4
-; CHECK-SIV-ONLY-NEXT:    da analyze - confused!
-; CHECK-SIV-ONLY-NEXT:  Src: %0 = load i32, ptr %arrayidx1, align 4 --> Dst: %0 = load i32, ptr %arrayidx1, align 4
-; CHECK-SIV-ONLY-NEXT:    da analyze - none!
-; CHECK-SIV-ONLY-NEXT:  Src: %0 = load i32, ptr %arrayidx1, align 4 --> Dst: store i32 %0, ptr %B.addr.01, align 4
-; CHECK-SIV-ONLY-NEXT:    da analyze - confused!
-; CHECK-SIV-ONLY-NEXT:  Src: store i32 %0, ptr %B.addr.01, align 4 --> Dst: store i32 %0, ptr %B.addr.01, align 4
-; CHECK-SIV-ONLY-NEXT:    da analyze - none!
-;
 entry:
   br label %for.body
 
@@ -429,20 +329,6 @@ define void @exact7(ptr %A, ptr %B) nounwind uwtable ssp {
 ; CHECK-NEXT:  Src: store i32 %0, ptr %B.addr.01, align 4 --> Dst: store i32 %0, ptr %B.addr.01, align 4
 ; CHECK-NEXT:    da analyze - none!
 ;
-; CHECK-SIV-ONLY-LABEL: 'exact7'
-; CHECK-SIV-ONLY-NEXT:  Src: store i32 %conv, ptr %arrayidx, align 4 --> Dst: store i32 %conv, ptr %arrayidx, align 4
-; CHECK-SIV-ONLY-NEXT:    da analyze - none!
-; CHECK-SIV-ONLY-NEXT:  Src: store i32 %conv, ptr %arrayidx, align 4 --> Dst: %0 = load i32, ptr %arrayidx1, align 4
-; CHECK-SIV-ONLY-NEXT:    da analyze - flow [*|<]!
-; CHECK-SIV-ONLY-NEXT:  Src: store i32 %conv, ptr %arrayidx, align 4 --> Dst: store i32 %0, ptr %B.addr.01, align 4
-; CHECK-SIV-ONLY-NEXT:    da analyze - confused!
-; CHECK-SIV-ONLY-NEXT:  Src: %0 = load i32, ptr %arrayidx1, align 4 --> Dst: %0 = load i32, ptr %arrayidx1, align 4
-; CHECK-SIV-ONLY-NEXT:    da analyze - none!
-; CHECK-SIV-ONLY-NEXT:  Src: %0 = load i32, ptr %arrayidx1, align 4 --> Dst: store i32 %0, ptr %B.addr.01, align 4
-; CHECK-SIV-ONLY-NEXT:    da analyze - confused!
-; CHECK-SIV-ONLY-NEXT:  Src: store i32 %0, ptr %B.addr.01, align 4 --> Dst: store i32 %0, ptr %B.addr.01, align 4
-; CHECK-SIV-ONLY-NEXT:    da analyze - none!
-;
 entry:
   br label %for.body
 
@@ -486,20 +372,6 @@ define void @exact8(ptr %A, ptr %B) nounwind uwtable ssp {
 ; CHECK-NEXT:  Src: store i32 %0, ptr %B.addr.01, align 4 --> Dst: store i32 %0, ptr %B.addr.01, align 4
 ; CHECK-NEXT:    da analyze - none!
 ;
-; CHECK-SIV-ONLY-LABEL: 'exact8'
-; CHECK-SIV-ONLY-NEXT:  Src: store i32 %conv, ptr %arrayidx, align 4 --> Dst: store i32 %conv, ptr %arrayidx, align 4
-; CHECK-SIV-ONLY-NEXT:    da analyze - none!
-; CHECK-SIV-ONLY-NEXT:  Src: store i32 %conv, ptr %arrayidx, align 4 --> Dst: %0 = load i32, ptr %arrayidx2, align 4
-; CHECK-SIV-ONLY-NEXT:    da analyze - none!
-; CHECK-SIV-ONLY-NEXT:  Src: store i32 %conv, ptr %arrayidx, align 4 --> Dst: store i32 %0, ptr %B.addr.01, align 4
-; CHECK-SIV-ONLY-NEXT:    da analyze - confused!
-; CHECK-SIV-ONLY-NEXT:  Src: %0 = load i32, ptr %arrayidx2, align 4 --> Dst: %0 = load i32, ptr %arrayidx2, align 4
-; CHECK-SIV-ONLY-NEXT:    da analyze - none!
-; CHECK-SIV-ONLY-NEXT:  Src: %0 = load i32, ptr %arrayidx2, align 4 --> Dst: store i32 %0, ptr %B.addr.01, align 4
-; CHECK-SIV-ONLY-NEXT:    da analyze - confused!
-; CHECK-SIV-ONLY-NEXT:  Src: store i32 %0, ptr %B.addr.01, align 4 --> Dst: store i32 %0, p...
[truncated]

Meinersbur

LGTM, thnk you

Meinersbur · 2025-10-20T15:44:50Z

llvm/test/Analysis/DependenceAnalysis/run-specific-dependence-test.ll

Would have been nice for each test method to have a test case that only that method can process. The consistent output [*] checks are negative tests (tests for something to not work). Only -da-enable-dependence-test=strong-siv is really tested here.

On the other side, I am already happy with the fine granularity of this PR.

Separated the tests for each method. It seems impossible to create fully dedicated tests for all methods due to certain reasons (e.g., testSIV calls gcdMIVtest), but generally looks fine to me.

Meinersbur · 2025-10-20T15:50:10Z

llvm/lib/Analysis/DependenceAnalysis.cpp

+
+} // anonymous namespace
+
+static cl::opt<DependenceTestType> EnableDependenceTest(


Next improvement could be to accept a list of enabled tests (cl::list<DependenceTestType>)

* [flang] Fix standalone build regression from llvm#161179 (llvm#164309) Fix incorrect linking and dependencies introduced in llvm#161179 that break standalone builds of Flang. Signed-off-by: Michał Górny <mgorny@gentoo.org> * [AMDGPU] Remove magic constants from V_PK_ADD_F32 pattern. NFC (llvm#164335) * [AMDGPU] Update code sequence for CU-mode Release Fences in GFX10+ (llvm#161638) They were previously optimized to not emit any waitcnt, which is technically correct because there is no reordering of operations at workgroup scope in CU mode for GFX10+. This breaks transitivity however, for example if we have the following sequence of events in one thread: - some stores - store atomic release syncscope("workgroup") - barrier then another thread follows with - barrier - load atomic acquire - store atomic release syncscope("agent") It does not work because, while the other thread sees the stores, it cannot release them at the wider scope. Our release fences aren't strong enough to "wait" on stores from other waves. We also cannot strengthen our release fences any further to allow for releasing other wave's stores because only GFX12 can do that with `global_wb`. GFX10-11 do not have the writeback instruction. It'd also add yet another level of complexity to code sequences, with both acquire/release having CU-mode only alternatives. Lastly, acq/rel are always used together. The price for synchronization has to be paid either at the acq, or the rel. Strengthening the releases would just make the memory model more complex but wouldn't help performance. So the choice here is to streamline the code sequences by making CU and WGP mode emit almost identical (vL0 inv is not needed in CU mode) code for release (or stronger) atomic ordering. This also removes the `vm_vsrc(0)` wait before barriers. Now that the release fence in CU mode is strong enough, it is no longer needed. Supersedes llvm#160501 Solves SC1-6454 * [InstSimplify] Support ptrtoaddr in simplifyGEPInst() (llvm#164262) This adds support for ptrtoaddr in the `ptradd p, ptrtoaddr(p2) - ptrtoaddr(p) -> p2` fold. This fold requires that p and p2 have the same underlying object (otherwise the provenance may not be the same). The argument I would like to make here is that because the underlying objects are the same (and the pointers in the same address space), the non-address bits of the pointer must be the same. Looking at some specific cases of underlying object relationship: * phi/select: Trivially true. * getelementptr: Only modifies address bits, non-address bits must remain the same. * addrspacecast round-trip cast: Must preserve all bits because we optimize such round-trip casts away. * non-interposable global alias: I'm a bit unsure about this one, but I guess the alias and the aliasee must have the same non-address bits? * various intrinsics like launder.invariant.group, ptrmask. I think these all either preserve all pointer bits (like the invariant.group ones) or at least the non-address bits (like ptrmask). There are some interesting cases like amdgcn.make.buffer.rsrc, but those are cross address-space. ----- There is a second `gep (gep p, C), (sub 0, ptrtoint(p)) -> C` transform in this function, which I am not extending to handle ptrtoaddr, adding negative tests instead. This transform is overall dubious for provenance reasons, but especially dubious with ptrtoaddr, as then we don't have the guarantee that provenance of `p` has been exposed. * [Hexagon] Add REQUIRES: asserts to test This test uses -debug-only, so needs an assertion-enabled build. * [AArch64] Combing scalar_to_reg into DUP if the DUP already exists (llvm#160499) If we already have a dup(x) as part of the DAG along with a scalar_to_vec(x), we can re-use the result of the dup to the scalar_to_vec(x). * [CAS] OnDiskGraphDB - fix MSVC "not all control paths return a value" warnings. NFC. (llvm#164369) * Reapply "[libc++] Optimize __hash_table::erase(iterator, iterator)" (llvm#162850) This reapplication fixes the use after free caused by not properly updating the bucket list in one case. Original commit message: Instead of just calling the single element `erase` on every element of the range, we can combine some of the operations in a custom implementation. Specifically, we don't need to search for the previous node or re-link the list every iteration. Removing this unnecessary work results in some nice performance improvements: ``` ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Benchmark old new ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- std::unordered_set<int>::erase(iterator, iterator) (erase half the container)/0 457 ns 459 ns std::unordered_set<int>::erase(iterator, iterator) (erase half the container)/32 995 ns 626 ns std::unordered_set<int>::erase(iterator, iterator) (erase half the container)/1024 18196 ns 7995 ns std::unordered_set<int>::erase(iterator, iterator) (erase half the container)/8192 124722 ns 70125 ns std::unordered_set<std::string>::erase(iterator, iterator) (erase half the container)/0 456 ns 461 ns std::unordered_set<std::string>::erase(iterator, iterator) (erase half the container)/32 1183 ns 769 ns std::unordered_set<std::string>::erase(iterator, iterator) (erase half the container)/1024 27827 ns 18614 ns std::unordered_set<std::string>::erase(iterator, iterator) (erase half the container)/8192 266681 ns 226107 ns std::unordered_map<int, int>::erase(iterator, iterator) (erase half the container)/0 455 ns 462 ns std::unordered_map<int, int>::erase(iterator, iterator) (erase half the container)/32 996 ns 659 ns std::unordered_map<int, int>::erase(iterator, iterator) (erase half the container)/1024 15963 ns 8108 ns std::unordered_map<int, int>::erase(iterator, iterator) (erase half the container)/8192 136493 ns 71848 ns std::unordered_multiset<int>::erase(iterator, iterator) (erase half the container)/0 454 ns 455 ns std::unordered_multiset<int>::erase(iterator, iterator) (erase half the container)/32 985 ns 703 ns std::unordered_multiset<int>::erase(iterator, iterator) (erase half the container)/1024 16277 ns 9085 ns std::unordered_multiset<int>::erase(iterator, iterator) (erase half the container)/8192 125736 ns 82710 ns std::unordered_multimap<int, int>::erase(iterator, iterator) (erase half the container)/0 457 ns 454 ns std::unordered_multimap<int, int>::erase(iterator, iterator) (erase half the container)/32 1091 ns 646 ns std::unordered_multimap<int, int>::erase(iterator, iterator) (erase half the container)/1024 17784 ns 7664 ns std::unordered_multimap<int, int>::erase(iterator, iterator) (erase half the container)/8192 127098 ns 72806 ns ``` This reverts commit acc3a62. * [TableGen] List the indices of sub-operands (llvm#163723) Some instances of the `Operand` class used in Tablegen instruction definitions expand to a cluster of multiple operands at the MC layer, such as complex addressing modes involving base + offset + shift, or clusters of operands describing conditional Arm instructions or predicated MVE instructions. There's currently no convenient way for C++ code to know the offset of one of those sub-operands from the start of the cluster: instead it just hard-codes magic numbers like `index+2`, which is hard to read and fragile. This patch adds an extra piece of output to `InstrInfoEmitter` to define those instruction offsets, based on the name of the `Operand` class instance in Tablegen, and the names assigned to the sub-operands in the `MIOperandInfo` field. For example, if target Foo were to define def Bar : Operand { let MIOperandInfo = (ops GPR:$first, i32imm:$second); // ... } then the new constants would be `Foo::SUBOP_Bar_first` and `Foo::SUBOP_Bar_second`, defined as 0 and 1 respectively. As an example, I've converted some magic numbers related to the MVE predication operand types (`vpred_n` and its superset `vpred_r`) to use the new named constants in place of the integer literals they previously used. This is more verbose, but also clearer, because it explains why the integer is chosen instead of what its value is. * [lldb] Add bidirectional packetLog to gdbclientutils.py (llvm#162176) While debugging the tests for llvm#155000 I found it helpful to have both sides of the simulated gdb-rsp traffic rather than just the responses so I've extended the packetLog in MockGDBServerResponder to record traffic in both directions. Tests have been updated accordingly * [MLIR] [Vector] Added canonicalizer for folding from_elements + transpose (llvm#161841) ## Description Adds a new canonicalizer that folds `vector.from_elements(vector.transpose))` => `vector.from_elements`. This canonicalization reorders the input elements for `vector.from_elements`, adjusts the output shape to match the effect of the transpose op and eliminating its need. ## Testing Added a 2D vector lit test that verifies the working of the rewrite. --------- Signed-off-by: Keshav Vinayak Jha <keshavvinayakjha@gmail.com> * [DA] Add initial support for monotonicity check (llvm#162280) The dependence testing functions in DA assume that the analyzed AddRec does not wrap over the entire iteration space. For AddRecs that may wrap, DA should conservatively return unknown dependence. However, no validation is currently performed to ensure that this condition holds, which can lead to incorrect results in some cases. This patch introduces the notion of *monotonicity* and a validation logic to check whether a SCEV is monotonic. The monotonicity check classifies the SCEV into one of the following categories: - Unknown: Nothing is known about the monotonicity of the SCEV. - Invariant: The SCEV is loop-invariant. - MultivariateSignedMonotonic: The SCEV doesn't wrap in a signed sense for any iteration of the loops in the loop nest. The current validation logic basically searches an affine AddRec recursively and checks whether the `nsw` flag is present. Notably, it is still unclear whether we should also have a category for unsigned monotonicity. The monotonicity check is still under development and disabled by default for now. Since such a check is necessary to make DA sound, it should be enabled by default once the functionality is sufficient. Split off from llvm#154527. * [VPlan] Use VPlan::getRegion to shorten code (NFC) (llvm#164287) * [VPlan] Improve code using m_APInt (NFC) (llvm#161683) * [SystemZ] Avoid trunc(add(X,X)) patterns (llvm#164378) Replace with trunc(add(X,Y)) to avoid premature folding in upcoming patch llvm#164227 * [clang][CodeGen] Emit `llvm.tbaa.errno` metadata during module creation Let Clang emit `llvm.tbaa.errno` metadata in order to let LLVM carry out optimizations around errno-writing libcalls to, as long as it is proved the involved memory location does not alias `errno`. Previous discussion: https://discourse.llvm.org/t/rfc-modelling-errno-memory-effects/82972. * [LV][NFC] Remove undef from phi incoming values (llvm#163762) Split off from PR llvm#163525, this standalone patch replaces use of undef as incoming PHI values with zero, in order to reduce the likelihood of contributors hitting the `undef deprecator` warning in github. * [DA] Add option to enable specific dependence test only (llvm#164245) PR llvm#157084 added an option `da-run-siv-routines-only` to run only SIV routines in DA. This PR replaces that option with a more fine-grained one that allows to select other than SIV routines as well. This option is useful for regression testing of individual DA routines. This patch also reorganizes regression tests that use `da-run-siv-routines-only`. * [libcxx] Optimize `std::generate_n` for segmented iterators (llvm#164266) Part of llvm#102817. This is a natural follow-up to llvm#163006. We are forwarding `std::generate_n` to `std::__for_each_n` (`std::for_each_n` needs c++17), resulting in improved performance for segmented iterators. before: ``` std::generate_n(deque<int>)/32 17.5 ns 17.3 ns 40727273 std::generate_n(deque<int>)/50 25.7 ns 25.5 ns 26352941 std::generate_n(deque<int>)/1024 490 ns 487 ns 1445161 std::generate_n(deque<int>)/8192 3908 ns 3924 ns 179200 ``` after: ``` std::generate_n(deque<int>)/32 11.1 ns 11.0 ns 64000000 std::generate_n(deque<int>)/50 16.1 ns 16.0 ns 44800000 std::generate_n(deque<int>)/1024 291 ns 292 ns 2357895 std::generate_n(deque<int>)/8192 2269 ns 2250 ns 298667 ``` * [BOLT] Check entry point address is not in constant island (llvm#163418) There are cases where `addEntryPointAtOffset` is called with a given `Offset` that points to an address within a constant island. This triggers `assert(!isInConstantIsland(EntryPointAddress)` and causes BOLT to crash. This patch adds a check which ignores functions that would add such entry points and warns the user. * [llvm][dwarfdump] Pretty-print DW_AT_language_version (llvm#164222) In both verbose and non-verbose mode we will now use the `llvm::dwarf::LanguageDescription` to turn the version into a human readable string. In verbose mode we also display the raw version code (similar to how we display addresses in verbose mode). To make the version code and prettified easier to distinguish, we print the prettified name in colour (if available), which is consistent with how `DW_AT_language` is printed in colour. Before: ``` 0x0000000c: DW_TAG_compile_unit DW_AT_language_name (DW_LNAME_C) DW_AT_language_version (201112) ``` After: ``` 0x0000000c: DW_TAG_compile_unit DW_AT_language_name (DW_LNAME_C) DW_AT_language_version (201112 C11) ``` --------- Signed-off-by: Michał Górny <mgorny@gentoo.org> Signed-off-by: Keshav Vinayak Jha <keshavvinayakjha@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: Michał Górny <mgorny@gentoo.org> Co-authored-by: Stanislav Mekhanoshin <Stanislav.Mekhanoshin@amd.com> Co-authored-by: Pierre van Houtryve <pierre.vanhoutryve@amd.com> Co-authored-by: Nikita Popov <npopov@redhat.com> Co-authored-by: David Green <david.green@arm.com> Co-authored-by: Simon Pilgrim <llvm-dev@redking.me.uk> Co-authored-by: Nikolas Klauser <nikolasklauser@berlin.de> Co-authored-by: Simon Tatham <simon.tatham@arm.com> Co-authored-by: Daniel Sanders <daniel_l_sanders@apple.com> Co-authored-by: Keshav Vinayak Jha <31160700+keshavvinayak01@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: Ryotaro Kasuga <kasuga.ryotaro@fujitsu.com> Co-authored-by: Ramkumar Ramachandra <ramkumar.ramachandra@codasip.com> Co-authored-by: Antonio Frighetto <me@antoniofrighetto.com> Co-authored-by: David Sherwood <david.sherwood@arm.com> Co-authored-by: Connector Switch <c8ef@outlook.com> Co-authored-by: Asher Dobrescu <asher.dobrescu@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: Michael Buch <michaelbuch12@gmail.com>

[DA] Add option to enable specific dependence test only

c197ec7

kasuga-fj mentioned this pull request Oct 20, 2025

[DA] Add tests where dependencies are missed due to overflow (NFC) #164246

Open

kasuga-fj commented Oct 20, 2025

View reviewed changes

kasuga-fj marked this pull request as ready for review October 20, 2025 12:39

kasuga-fj requested review from Meinersbur and sjoerdmeijer October 20, 2025 12:39

llvmbot added the llvm:analysis Includes value tracking, cost tables and constant folding label Oct 20, 2025

Meinersbur approved these changes Oct 20, 2025

View reviewed changes

kasuga-fj added 2 commits October 21, 2025 02:00

add more tests

71f34cf

Merge branch 'main' into users/kasuga-fj/da-option-to-select-routine

aafd29c

kasuga-fj enabled auto-merge (squash) October 21, 2025 09:19

kasuga-fj merged commit 2eb9251 into main Oct 21, 2025
9 of 10 checks passed

kasuga-fj deleted the users/kasuga-fj/da-option-to-select-routine branch October 21, 2025 09:59

kasuga-fj mentioned this pull request Oct 21, 2025

[DA] Check nsw when extracting a constant operand of SCEVMul #164408

Open

Provide feedback

Saved searches

Use saved searches to filter your results more quickly

Uh oh!

[DA] Add option to enable specific dependence test only #164245

[DA] Add option to enable specific dependence test only #164245

Uh oh!

kasuga-fj commented Oct 20, 2025 •

edited

Loading

Uh oh!

kasuga-fj commented Oct 20, 2025 •

edited

Loading

Uh oh!

kasuga-fj Oct 20, 2025

Uh oh!

llvmbot commented Oct 20, 2025

Uh oh!

Meinersbur left a comment

Uh oh!

Meinersbur Oct 20, 2025

Uh oh!

kasuga-fj Oct 20, 2025

Uh oh!

Meinersbur Oct 20, 2025

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

Reviewers

Assignees

Labels

Projects

Milestone

Development

Uh oh!

3 participants

		; RUN: opt < %s -disable-output "-passes=print<da>" -da-run-siv-routines-only 2>&1 \
		; RUN: \| FileCheck %s --check-prefix=CHECK-SIV-ONLY


		} // anonymous namespace

		static cl::opt<DependenceTestType> EnableDependenceTest(

[DA] Add option to enable specific dependence test only #164245

[DA] Add option to enable specific dependence test only #164245

Uh oh!

Conversation

kasuga-fj commented Oct 20, 2025 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

kasuga-fj commented Oct 20, 2025 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

kasuga-fj Oct 20, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

llvmbot commented Oct 20, 2025

Uh oh!

Meinersbur left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

Meinersbur Oct 20, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

kasuga-fj Oct 20, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

Meinersbur Oct 20, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

Reviewers

Assignees

Labels

Projects

Milestone

Development

Uh oh!

3 participants

kasuga-fj commented Oct 20, 2025 •

edited

Loading

kasuga-fj commented Oct 20, 2025 •

edited

Loading