-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 15.2k
[Clang][CodeGen] Use EmitLoadOfLValue instead of EmitLoadOfScalar to get LHS for complex compound assignment #166798
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
+28
−2
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
10 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
eab7dd0
[Clang][CodeGen] Use EmitLoadOfLValue instead of EmitLoadOfScalar to …
BStott6 abcef13
Merge branch 'llvm:main' into fix-166512
BStott6 ab4e0ee
Replace EmitStoreOfScalar with EmitStoreThroughLValue too
BStott6 5a203e6
Introduce test for fixed crash
BStott6 6ca51cd
Add test for correct codegen
BStott6 1232acd
Add release note for fix
BStott6 76b16c9
Clarify test
BStott6 03d0c67
Remove UBSan complex bitfield crash test
BStott6 3cb3f71
Merge branch 'main' into fix-166512
BStott6 c85dc55
Specify triple for codegen test
BStott6 File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
|---|---|---|
| @@ -0,0 +1,25 @@ | ||
| // RUN: %clang_cc1 %s -triple x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu -std=c23 -emit-llvm -o - | FileCheck %s | ||
|
|
||
| struct Bits { | ||
| int pad1: 30; | ||
| bool b: 1; | ||
| int pad2: 1; | ||
| }; | ||
|
|
||
| int main(void) { | ||
| // CHECK-LABEL: define dso_local i32 @main() #0 { | ||
| struct Bits x; | ||
| x.b += __builtin_complex(-1.0f, 0.0f); | ||
| // CHECK: %bf.load = load i32, ptr %x, align 4 | ||
| // CHECK-NEXT: %bf.lshr = lshr i32 %bf.load, 30 | ||
| // CHECK-NEXT: %bf.clear = and i32 %bf.lshr, 1 | ||
| // CHECK-NEXT: %bf.cast = trunc i32 %bf.clear to i1 | ||
| // CHECK-NEXT: %conv = uitofp i1 %bf.cast to float | ||
|
|
||
| // CHECK: %0 = zext i1 %tobool1 to i32 | ||
| // CHECK-NEXT: %bf.load2 = load i32, ptr %x, align 4 | ||
| // CHECK-NEXT: %bf.shl = shl i32 %0, 30 | ||
| // CHECK-NEXT: %bf.clear3 = and i32 %bf.load2, -1073741825 | ||
| // CHECK-NEXT: %bf.set = or i32 %bf.clear3, %bf.shl | ||
| // CHECK-NEXT: store i32 %bf.set, ptr %x, align 4 | ||
| } |
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Do we also need to change the call to EmitStoreOfScalar?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I'll look into it
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think it does make sense to replace it with EmitStoreThroughLValue, what do you think?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
That seems fine.