Skip to content
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension

Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
14 changes: 10 additions & 4 deletions llvm/include/llvm/IR/ProfDataUtils.h
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -18,6 +18,8 @@
#include "llvm/ADT/SmallVector.h"
#include "llvm/IR/Metadata.h"
#include "llvm/Support/Compiler.h"
#include <cstddef>
#include <type_traits>

namespace llvm {
struct MDProfLabels {
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -216,9 +218,13 @@ LLVM_ABI void scaleProfData(Instruction &I, uint64_t S, uint64_t T);
/// branch weights B1 and B2, respectively. In both B1 and B2, the first
/// position (index 0) is for the 'true' branch, and the second position (index
/// 1) is for the 'false' branch.
template <typename T1, typename T2,
typename = typename std::enable_if<
std::is_arithmetic_v<T1> && std::is_arithmetic_v<T2> &&
sizeof(T1) <= sizeof(uint64_t) && sizeof(T2) <= sizeof(uint64_t)>>
inline SmallVector<uint64_t, 2>
getDisjunctionWeights(const SmallVector<uint32_t, 2> &B1,
const SmallVector<uint32_t, 2> &B2) {
getDisjunctionWeights(const SmallVector<T1, 2> &B1,
const SmallVector<T2, 2> &B2) {
// For the first conditional branch, the probability the "true" case is taken
// is p(b1) = B1[0] / (B1[0] + B1[1]). The "false" case's probability is
// p(not b1) = B1[1] / (B1[0] + B1[1]).
Expand All @@ -235,8 +241,8 @@ getDisjunctionWeights(const SmallVector<uint32_t, 2> &B1,
// the product of sums, the subtracted one cancels out).
assert(B1.size() == 2);
assert(B2.size() == 2);
auto FalseWeight = B1[1] * B2[1];
auto TrueWeight = B1[0] * B2[0] + B1[0] * B2[1] + B1[1] * B2[0];
uint64_t FalseWeight = B1[1] * B2[1];
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

What's the motivation for changing this? Previously it would default to the integer type, but now it's fixed.

Shouldn't be a big issue for uint64_t specifically, but maybe a good idea to add a static assert that the bit width of T1/T2 is less than or equal to 64?

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

to avoid overflow. I missed the fact I should have declared it uint64_t explicitly the first time around.

added static asserts.

uint64_t TrueWeight = B1[0] * (B2[0] + B2[1]) + B1[1] * B2[0];
return {TrueWeight, FalseWeight};
}
} // namespace llvm
Expand Down
Loading