Skip to content

Conversation

@zqb-all
Copy link
Contributor

@zqb-all zqb-all commented Dec 4, 2025

No description provided.

@llvmbot
Copy link
Member

llvmbot commented Dec 4, 2025

@llvm/pr-subscribers-backend-risc-v

Author: Mark Zhuang (zqb-all)

Changes

Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/170598.diff

1 Files Affected:

  • (modified) llvm/docs/RISCVUsage.rst (+1-1)
diff --git a/llvm/docs/RISCVUsage.rst b/llvm/docs/RISCVUsage.rst
index a21f03d389444..a540cf7e5d064 100644
--- a/llvm/docs/RISCVUsage.rst
+++ b/llvm/docs/RISCVUsage.rst
@@ -551,7 +551,7 @@ The current vendor extensions supported are:
   LLVM implements `version 5.0.0 of the Andes Vector Dot Product Extension specification <https://github.com/andestech/andes-v5-isa/releases/download/ast-v5_4_0-release/AndeStar_V5_ISA_Spec_UM165-v1.5.08-20250317.pdf>`__ by Andes Technology. All instructions are prefixed with `nds.` as described in the specification.
 
 ``XSMTVDot``
-  SpacemiT defines `Intrinsic Matrix Extension (IME) specification <https://github.com/space-mit/riscv-ime-extension-spec/releases/tag/v0429>`__.
+  SpacemiT defines `Integrated Matrix Extension (IME) specification <https://github.com/spacemit-com/riscv-ime-extension-spec/releases/tag/v1.0>`__.
   LLVM implement the hardware-adapted subset for SpacemiT X60, defined in the `feature document <https://developer.spacemit.com/documentation?token=BWbGwbx7liGW21kq9lucSA6Vnpb#2.1>`__ by SpacemiT. All instructions are prefixed with `smt.` as described in the implementation guide. Note that this implemented subset is `version 1.0.0 of the SpacemiT Vector Dot Product Extension specification`, which is strictly a subset of the full IME specification to reflect the capabilities of SpacemiT X60 hardware correctly.
 
 Experimental C Intrinsics

Copy link
Member

@lenary lenary left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@zqb-all zqb-all merged commit b75e564 into llvm:main Dec 5, 2025
13 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants