-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 6
DM-52360: Switch the default finalJob to aggregate-graph. #214
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
3 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
Some comments aren't visible on the classic Files Changed page.
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
|---|---|---|
| @@ -0,0 +1 @@ | ||
| Switch the default `finalJob` implementation to the new `aggregate-graph` command, which makes use of multiple cores much more effectively than `transfer-from-graph`. |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The arguments don't match current implementation. Also, the value for
-jdoesn't match value given forrequestCpus. Should it?I would add a couple more variables to make changes and running with mocks easier. If a different name makes more sense, please change.
So on my smaller workstation running a ci_middleware workflow with mocked failures, I needed to add the following to my submit yaml:
p.s., I wouldn't object to these going inside the
finalsection likefinalPreCmdOpts. But looking forward to having a side aggregate job, setting the values once at the root level that would be used by both the aggregate and final jobs would be ideal if generally they would match.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I've adopted you recommended configuration pretty-much as-is (I just revised the default resource usage lower, per the other thread). I didn't realize one could define a new BPS variable implicitly like this.
As for using the
finalJobsection for the new variables, at this point I'm not really anticipating adding a side aggregate, but I don't think we'll know for sure until CM starts using this in production. I am still hoping to support running it manually on the side, much as one can already do with thetransfer-from-graphfinalJob. Should we just move the new variables into that section, then?