Where should trace review end and trust review begin for coding-agent runs?

[camirian]

I am looking for one hard objection, not promotion.

I found AgentTrace through the post-run trace review workflow. I am testing a small synthetic evidence-gate contract for autonomous coding runs. The narrow claim is: traces are necessary, but a reviewer still needs an explicit trust decision before accepting a run.

The fastest artifact path is here:

https://github.com/camirian/fieldheld-recorder/blob/main/docs/REVIEWER_PACKET_INDEX.md

From a local-first session diagnostics perspective, does this evidence gate add anything beyond trace review, or is it redundant artifact noise?

One concrete objection would be useful.

[camirian]

Brief follow-up with a narrower review target.

I added a seven-minute PR-review fixture request so this is less of a broad project ask:
https://github.com/camirian/fieldheld-recorder/blob/main/docs/PR_REVIEW_CRITIQUE_REQUEST.md

The concrete artifact is a deterministic GitHub PR review bundle:
https://github.com/camirian/fieldheld-recorder/blob/main/samples/fieldheld-pr-review-sample/reviewer_packet.md

Core question: would this reduce PR review burden, or does it add noise? If it adds noise, what is the first unsupported, noisy, or missing field?

If this is not relevant here, no need to respond; I will not keep bumping the thread.