Oracle and Other RDBMS Status?

[dicgf8]

What is the status on multiple RDBMS' to be included in version 2?

[magento-team]

Thank you for this question. This is still being evaluated as of now.

[dicgf8]

Do you have/know of a solution so I can test Magento 2 with Oracle?

On Mon, Oct 15, 2012 at 5:10 PM, mage2-team notifications@github.comwrote:

Thank you for this question. This is still being evaluated as of now.

—
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHubhttps://github.com//issues/100#issuecomment-9463771.

[VDuda]

Was hoping this issue could be re-addressed. I'd love to help in progressing the abstraction for Multiple RDBMS'.

[alankent]

High confidence prediction: wont be done for Magento 2.0. We are looking at the right strategic direction for the database layer, with a low probability of significant change here in the 2.0 time frame. That is, we would like to share the direction we plan to head but it probably wont be implemented until after 2.0.

On top of that, we use MySQL specific features which would have to be ported to other database systems. Right now Oracle is not on the Magento roadmap. If we pick up an ORM tool such as Doctrine, that might provide a way forward for greater database abstraction.

There investigation going on internally about what is the long term strategy, but low probability any significant change will come in the Magento 2.0 timeframe.

[theroch]

Here is an comment from another thread:
"We investigated moving to Doctrine, but it was too much work for the Magento 2.0.0 release. We may however do it in 2.1, 2.2, 3.0, or... (no commitment yet). When we do get to it, we may also change our mind whether to use ZF1, ZF2, Doctrine etc based on new information available."

source

[magento-engcom-team]

Hi @dicgf8. Thank you for your report.
The issue has been fixed in magento/graphql-ce#102 by @dmytro-ch in 2.3-develop branch
Related commit(s):

• 9116d8259244ac3b03dec76f39aa56e2d478998f

The fix will be available with the upcoming 2.3.0 release.

[VladimirZaets]

Hi @dicgf8. Thank you for your report.
The issue has been fixed in #25940 by @sedonik in 2.4-develop branch
Related commit(s):

• dc8821dc2e297c1b73064ea49c1c4e7253b7e84f
• f305a84472fc0222147844ffa83542c01cd1c023
• 345ece3f5277c1add6a1fd31cf8c830b3615c96f
• b1e518ca649a862abca2856db0c99d385ba964a3

The fix will be available with the upcoming 2.4.0 release.

[theroch]

The issue has been fixed in #25940 by @sedonik in 2.4-develop branch

The fix will be available with the upcoming 2.4.0 release.

I think @dicgf8 meant the support of different RDBMS like Oracle, PostgreSQL, MS-SQL etc. and not asynchronous operations. So #25940 doesn't solve his question.