Plane AI credits #366
Plane AI credits #366
Conversation
|
The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for GitHub.
|
WalkthroughAdds a new Plane AI credits documentation page, replaces the former free-trial content with an "AI credits and usage" section in billing docs, and updates the sidebar to include the new credits page. Changes
Estimated code review effort🎯 2 (Simple) | ⏱️ ~10 minutes
Poem
Pre-merge checks and finishing touches✅ Passed checks (3 passed)
✨ Finishing touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 2
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (3)
docs/ai/plane-ai-credits.mdx(1 hunks)docs/workspaces-and-users/billing-and-plans.mdx(1 hunks)sidebars.ts(1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 LanguageTool
docs/ai/plane-ai-credits.mdx
[style] ~46-~46: Consider a different adjective to strengthen your wording.
Context: ...ucture for optimization (250 credits) | Deep analysis across multiple projects, with...
(DEEP_PROFOUND)
[grammar] ~101-~101: Ensure spelling is correct
Context: ... | $4.00 | Small active teams | | Scale ack | 5,000 | $9.00 | Moderate automation u...
(QB_NEW_EN_ORTHOGRAPHY_ERROR_IDS_1)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (1)
- GitHub Check: Cursor Bugbot
🔇 Additional comments (11)
docs/ai/plane-ai-credits.mdx (9)
1-7: LGTM!The front matter and imports are properly configured with clear metadata.
8-27: LGTM!The introduction effectively explains the rationale for the credit system and clearly defines the three factors that influence credit consumption.
28-54: LGTM!The consumption patterns are clearly illustrated with practical examples and well-structured tables that help users understand how credits map to real-world usage.
56-65: LGTM!The plan comparison table provides a clear overview of credit allocations and policies across different tiers.
67-77: LGTM!The workspace pooling explanation clearly articulates the rationale and provides a concrete example of how shared credits work in practice.
79-91: LGTM!The credit lifecycle explanation is comprehensive, covering rollover policies for each plan tier and the FIFO usage strategy.
106-113: LGTM!The explanation of non-credit-consuming actions is clear and sets appropriate expectations, especially the clarification that deleting content doesn't refund credits.
114-122: LGTM!The fair usage and transparency features are well-designed, providing users with cost previews, automatic refunds for failures, and timely alerts.
124-192: LGTM!The FAQ section comprehensively addresses common user questions with clear, detailed answers in an accessible collapsible format.
sidebars.ts (1)
306-311: LGTM!The navigation changes correctly add the new AI credits documentation to the sidebar and clean up the formatting.
docs/workspaces-and-users/billing-and-plans.mdx (1)
60-65: LGTM!The updated billing documentation clearly introduces the credit-based AI system and appropriately distinguishes it from the seat-based subscription model. The link to the detailed credits page provides users with a clear path to more information.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
♻️ Duplicate comments (1)
docs/ai/plane-ai-credits.mdx (1)
193-195: Verify the pricing page anchor exists.The link on line 195 uses
#ai-&-creditsas the URL fragment. This issue was previously flagged but remains unresolved. The anchor may not exist on the pricing page, and the unencoded ampersand in the fragment could cause link failures depending on how the page is rendered.Before merging, verify one of the following:
- If the anchor exists on the pricing page: Update the link to use the correct fragment (URL-encode the ampersand as
%26if the page's anchor-parsing requires it, or use the matching anchor ID exactly as defined on the target page).- If no anchor exists: Remove the fragment and link to the top-level pricing page:
https://plane.so/pricingTo verify, manually visit https://plane.so/pricing and inspect the HTML to confirm whether an anchor with id
ai-&-creditsor similar exists.
🧹 Nitpick comments (2)
docs/ai/plane-ai-credits.mdx (2)
6-6: Remove unused import.The
Tagscomponent is imported but never used in the document.Apply this diff to remove the unused import:
-import Tags from "@site/src/components/Tags"; - # How Plane AI credits work
46-46: Consider a stronger descriptor for the analysis task.The phrasing "Deep analysis across multiple projects" is clear, but a more specific verb could strengthen the language (e.g., "Comprehensive analysis," "Multi-project audit," or "Detailed capacity assessment").
This is a minor enhancement and can be deferred if you prefer the current wording.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
docs/ai/plane-ai-credits.mdx(1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 LanguageTool
docs/ai/plane-ai-credits.mdx
[style] ~46-~46: Consider a different adjective to strengthen your wording.
Context: ...ucture for optimization (250 credits) | Deep analysis across multiple projects, with...
(DEEP_PROFOUND)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (1)
- GitHub Check: Cursor Bugbot
🔇 Additional comments (2)
docs/ai/plane-ai-credits.mdx (2)
8-104: Documentation content is well-structured and clear.The explanations of the credit system, consumption factors, and pricing tiers are comprehensive and user-friendly. Table formatting is correct (including "Scale pack" on line 101), and the examples effectively illustrate how credits work in practice.
106-192: FAQs and supporting sections provide clear guidance.The "What doesn't consume credits," fair usage transparency, and FAQ sections effectively address user concerns with concrete examples and straightforward language. The expandable details elements are properly formatted for accessibility.
Note
Adds a comprehensive AI credits guide, updates billing docs to reference it, and links the page in the AI sidebar.
docs/ai/plane-ai-credits.mdxdetailing AI credit system: consumption tiers, plan allocations/rollover, workspace pooling, top-ups, fairness/transparency, and FAQs.docs/workspaces-and-users/billing-and-plans.mdxwith new "AI credits and usage" section explaining pooled per-seat AI credits and linking to the detailed guide.ai/plane-ai-creditstosidebars.tsunder the AI category.Written by Cursor Bugbot for commit 3b528b8. This will update automatically on new commits. Configure here.
Summary by CodeRabbit