Skip to content

Conversation

@FelipeCortez
Copy link
Contributor

The cljdoc API import seems to have been failing since 1.3.0 because of a protobuf version mismatch. This PR switches the Temporal Java SDK to the shaded version. Analysis was tested locally with clojure -Ttools install io.github.cljdoc/cljdoc-analyzer '{:git/tag "RELEASE"}' :as cljdoc && lein jar && lein pom && clojure -Tcljdoc analyze-local and ran successfully after the change.

@FelipeCortez FelipeCortez force-pushed the fix-cljdoc-by-switching-to-temporal-shaded branch 3 times, most recently from cdb5c9f to 07b3161 Compare October 11, 2025 00:49
@ghaskins
Copy link
Contributor

@FelipeCortez could you add a link to the upstream PR that is blocking this one?

@FelipeCortez
Copy link
Contributor Author

@FelipeCortez could you add a link to the upstream PR that is blocking this one?

The PR got merged last month. I was waiting for the new SDK version release so we're able to pick up the change, and it seems like it finally happened last Friday. Updating the project.clj to test this out.

@FelipeCortez FelipeCortez force-pushed the fix-cljdoc-by-switching-to-temporal-shaded branch from 07b3161 to a30a594 Compare November 17, 2025 13:41
@FelipeCortez
Copy link
Contributor Author

@ghaskins seems like tests are passing now, but I had to resolve a merge conflict and need a new review.

ghaskins
ghaskins previously approved these changes Nov 17, 2025
Copy link
Contributor

@ghaskins ghaskins left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thank you!

@ghaskins
Copy link
Contributor

@FelipeCortez it still seems to need a rebase

@FelipeCortez FelipeCortez force-pushed the fix-cljdoc-by-switching-to-temporal-shaded branch 2 times, most recently from ad6f1a2 to 7e0d181 Compare November 17, 2025 20:00
Signed-off-by: Felipe Cortez <github@felipecortez.net>
@FelipeCortez FelipeCortez force-pushed the fix-cljdoc-by-switching-to-temporal-shaded branch from 7e0d181 to 5e2b58b Compare November 17, 2025 20:01
@FelipeCortez
Copy link
Contributor Author

@FelipeCortez it still seems to need a rebase

sorry about that! I'm used to keeping the merge commits. should be good now

@ghaskins ghaskins merged commit 6d512f4 into manetu:master Nov 20, 2025
2 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants