Update XOMHandle.java #1005
Merged
Update XOMHandle.java #1005
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Closed
ehennum
approved these changes
Sep 21, 2018
Contributor
ehennum
left a comment
ehennum
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Does the @ deprecated JavaDoc tag have to be part of the same comment as the rest of the JavaDoc? That is, should lines 47 and 48 be deleted? Approved with that change.
Contributor
Author
|
Merged the file after adding the changes. |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
So we can incorporate your pull request, please share the following:
Issue - 968
Are you modifying the correct branch? Yes (4.1.1-develop)
Version of MarkLogic Java Client API - 4.1.1
Version of MarkLogic Server (see admin gui on port 8001)
Java version (
java -version)OS and version
What Changed: What happened before this change? What happens without this change?