Draft: HB for kinds of topologies #885
Closed
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
affeldt-aist
added
enhancement ✨
proux01
force-pushed
the
hierarchy-builder
branch
from
7c4bc43 to
528617e
Compare
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
3 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Motivation for this change
Experimenting with hierarchy build to add more specific kinds of topologies directly into the hierarchy. We now have the ability to prove state and prove things like "for bool, the discrete and order topology agree" and similarly in
Rwith the norm and order.This will unlock a ton of refactoring. For example, all the variations of
cvgnyPwill collapse to a single "refines the right-ray topology" type. Lots of stuff about separation axioms (discrete implies hausdorff implies T0, etc) all get inferred.Things done/to do
CHANGELOG_UNRELEASED.md(do not edit former entries, only append new ones, be careful:
merge and rebase have a tendency to mess up
CHANGELOG_UNRELEASED.md)Automatic note to reviewers
Read this Checklist and put a milestone if possible.