DOC: clean up automated tests section of workflow docs #27696
Conversation
|
@dstansby will try and knock out those changes in the afternoon EST. |
|
@dstansby so in making changes, decided that the long bullets made more sense as a table (that's a habit of mine 😅). Stashed that in a second commit - if it looks good to you please squash merge, otherwise I'll drop it and make the original changes. |
story645
force-pushed
the
auto-tests
branch
14 times, most recently
from
04bd09e
to
124edd5
Compare
doc/devel/development_workflow.rst
Outdated
| - Type hints | ||
| - Errors are displayed as annotations on the pull request diff. | ||
| * - CircleCI | ||
| - reStructuredText (rst) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
| - reStructuredText (rst) | |
| - Documentation build |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Same as mentioned to @dstansby, what the documentation build fails on specifically is usually bad rst (which gonna rework that column so fails on is the title)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
but actually, let me just link each column to its part of the guide.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Also I can just name that column tests 🤦♀️
doc/devel/development_workflow.rst
Outdated
| If you know only a subset of CI checks need to be run, you can skip any unneeded CI | ||
| checks on individual commits by including the following substrings in commit messages: |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
| If you know only a subset of CI checks need to be run, you can skip any unneeded CI | |
| checks on individual commits by including the following substrings in commit messages: | |
| If you know only a subset of CI checks need to be run, you can skip any unneeded CI | |
| checks on individual commits by including the following strings in commit messages: |
"sub" does not add anything.
Also, do we want to recommend where to put these strings (first line or separate line at the end)? I'd favor the latter because these are technical control directives and not relevant when skimming through git logs. But then again, there's the exception of AppVeyor 😞. Maybe then let's not get into this.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Yeah, I don't think it's worth documenting cause we can always strip those out before merging and honestly I think basically everything should run through a "don't skip anything" run before merge.
doc/devel/development_workflow.rst
Outdated
| * - name | ||
| - scope | ||
| - tips for finding cause of failure |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
| * - name | |
| - scope | |
| - tips for finding cause of failure | |
| * - Name | |
| - Purpose | |
| - Tips for finding cause of failure |
Would handle capitalization like section titles.
Purpose (=What is this for) seems more helpful than scope.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Yeah, the reason wrote scope instead of purpose was b/c that column just had the topic (so like type hints is not a purpose, ) but if I rework the column contents than yes purpose makes sense.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
And also the problem with purpose is that there's an implied checks in front of every word in the table and that seems unweildy.
|
Made changes, I'm pretty test failures are unrelated |
turn ci information into tables
|
Test failures are unrelated. May partly be a regression in the recently released version pytest 8.0. |
PR summary
PR checklist