-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 454
Expanding on docstrings for approximate_gp and fully_bayesian #1330
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
|
@esantorella has imported this pull request. If you are a Meta employee, you can view this diff on Phabricator. |
Codecov Report
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #1330 +/- ##
=======================================
Coverage 99.99% 99.99%
=======================================
Files 122 122
Lines 10778 10778
=======================================
Hits 10777 10777
Misses 1 1
Help us with your feedback. Take ten seconds to tell us how you rate us. |
|
@esantorella has imported this pull request. If you are a Meta employee, you can view this diff on Phabricator. |
dme65
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks for improving our documentation! I rewrote a few sentences, but lgtm otherwise!
Co-authored-by: David Eriksson <dme65@cornell.edu>
|
@esantorella has imported this pull request. If you are a Meta employee, you can view this diff on Phabricator. |
NOTE: I am making several PRs each expanding on model documentation. I am trying to identify the best subject-matter experts for each as a reviewer. In this case this is @dme65 , especially for the fully Bayesian models; let me know if someone else should review the variational models.
this is the last docstring PR!
Motivation
Make it easier for people to understand what the different models do and figure out which one is right for their use case
Have you read the Contributing Guidelines on pull requests?
Yes
Test Plan
Related PRs
#1327, #1328 , #1329