feat: add new shadcn/ui components

[adelrodriguez]

No description provided.

[coderabbitai]

Important

Review skipped

Auto reviews are disabled on this repository.

Please check the settings in the CodeRabbit UI or the .coderabbit.yaml file in this repository. To trigger a single review, invoke the @coderabbitai review command.

You can disable this status message by setting the reviews.review_status to false in the CodeRabbit configuration file.

✨ Finishing touches

🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)

• Create PR with unit tests
• Post copyable unit tests in a comment
• Commit unit tests in branch new-shadcn-components

---

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

_{Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.}

[claude]

Claude finished @adelrodriguez's task —— View job

---

PR Review: Add new shadcn/ui components

Todo List:

• Read repository guidelines (CLAUDE.md)
• Review new UI components (button-group, empty, field, input-group, item, kbd, spinner)
• Review authentication form updates
• Review forgot-password functionality
• Check for security concerns
• Assess performance implications
• Check test coverage
• Provide comprehensive feedback

Code Quality & Best Practices ✅

Excellent Implementation

• All new components follow consistent shadcn/ui patterns with proper TypeScript typing
• Clean use of class-variance-authority for variant management
• Proper component composition with clear separation of concerns
• Good use of compound components (e.g., Empty + EmptyHeader + EmptyContent)
• Consistent data-slot attributes for styling hooks

Notable Strengths:

• Field components: Well-architected form field system with proper error handling in packages/ui/src/components/field.tsx:184-230
• Input groups: Sophisticated layout system with responsive variants in packages/ui/src/components/input-group.tsx:39-58
• Accessibility: Proper ARIA attributes and semantic HTML usage throughout

Security Assessment ✅

Authentication Flow Security

• Proper rate limiting implemented in apps/app/src/features/auth/server/functions.ts:50-53 (10 requests per minute)
• Email validation uses proper schema validation
• Password requirements enforced (8-32 characters)
• Note: Forgot password is currently mocked (apps/app/src/features/auth/server/functions.ts:56-60) - this needs actual implementation

Form Security

• Input sanitization through controlled components
• Proper form validation on both client and server side
• CSRF protection through form structure

Performance Considerations ✅

Optimizations:

• Efficient re-renders with useMemo in FieldError component (packages/ui/src/components/field.tsx:192-214)
• Minimal bundle impact - new components are tree-shakeable
• CSS-in-JS avoided in favor of utility classes for better performance

Potential Improvements:

• Consider lazy loading for complex form components if bundle size becomes an issue

Architecture & Design Patterns ✅

Excellent Patterns:

• Follows repository's Bun ecosystem preferences
• Consistent component API design across all new components
• Proper use of React patterns (controlled components, composition)
• Clean separation between UI components and business logic

Issues Found ⚠️

1. Missing Implementation

Forgot Password Functionality (apps/app/src/features/auth/server/functions.ts:56-60)

// Currently just a mock - needs actual email sending logic
context.logger.info(data, "Mocking forgot password")
await new Promise((resolve) => setTimeout(resolve, 1000))
return { success: true }

2. Test Coverage Gap 📋

Missing Tests for:

• New UI components (no test files found for new components)
• Authentication form logic
• Forgot password flow
• Form validation edge cases

Existing test structure shows the project uses bun test - recommend adding:

// packages/ui/src/components/__tests__/field.test.tsx
// apps/app/src/features/auth/components/__tests__/forgot-password-form.test.tsx

3. Minor Code Quality

biome-ignore overuse in packages/ui/src/components/input-group.tsx:1-3:

• Multiple ignore statements could indicate accessibility concerns that should be addressed rather than ignored

Dependencies ✅

• Dependency updates in packages/ui/package.json look safe
• No security vulnerabilities introduced
• Proper workspace dependency management

Recommendations

High Priority

1. Implement actual forgot password logic - replace mock with email service integration
2. Add comprehensive tests for new components and authentication flows

Medium Priority

3. Address accessibility concerns in input-group component instead of ignoring lint rules
4. Add error boundaries for form components to handle edge cases gracefully

Low Priority

5. Consider adding Storybook stories for new UI components to improve developer experience
6. Add JSDoc comments for complex component APIs

Summary

This is a high-quality implementation that significantly enhances the UI component library. The code follows excellent patterns and maintains consistency with the existing codebase. The main concerns are around completing the forgot password implementation and adding proper test coverage.

Recommendation: ✅ Approve after addressing the forgot password mock and adding basic tests

---

[adelrodriguez]

• feat: add new shadcn/ui components #44 👈 (View in Graphite)
• main

This stack of pull requests is managed by Graphite. Learn more about stacking.