Skip to content

Update logical data abstraction docs to show use of id_field attribute #94

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Merged
akira-dev merged 1 commit into from
Jun 26, 2018
Merged

Update logical data abstraction docs to show use of id_field attribute #94

akira-dev merged 1 commit into from
Jun 26, 2018

Conversation

@therealryanbonham
Copy link

@therealryanbonham therealryanbonham commented Mar 16, 2018

For Relationship() we need to set the id_field if the field is not named "id".

@coveralls
Copy link

coveralls commented Mar 16, 2018 •
edited
Loading

Coverage Status

Coverage remained the same at 94.341% when pulling ef241fb on therealryanbonham:id_field into 5efcbc4 on miLibris:master.

@akira-dev akira-dev merged commit 3e91d42 into miLibris:master Jun 26, 2018
@akira-dev
Copy link
Collaborator

akira-dev commented Jun 26, 2018

thx

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Reviewers

No reviews

Assignees

No one assigned

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Milestone

No milestone

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants

@therealryanbonham @coveralls @akira-dev @greengiant