Replies: 2 comments
-
|
There's a related feature, but it works the other way around, so it's worth being clear about the direction. Breadcrumbs has a Johnny.Decimal edge builder, but it's input-only: you name notes with the numeric prefix (e.g. So the specific ask here — automatically generating I'll leave this open as a feature request for auto-numbering an existing hierarchy, since that's genuinely not implemented. (Your tail question about "close siblings" is tracked separately in #309.) 🍞 |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
Breadcrumbs reads numbering to build hierarchy (the Johnny.Decimal builder: name a note That direction is an authoring/automation task rather than an edge-display feature, so it sits outside the plugin's core. Two ways to get it today:
Keeping the Johnny.Decimal flow one-directional (numbers → hierarchy) is intentional, so I'm closing this as resolved. Thanks for the suggestion! |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
Let's say I pick a node as the source/root node. It's children will be indexed as 1, 2, 3. Children of 1 will be indexed as 1.1, 1.2, 1.3, etc. Children of 1.1 will be indexed as 1.1.1, 1.1.2, 1.1.3, etc. Is there a way to automatically do that? Perhaps with the combination of the plugin Templater.
If I make the indexing more complicate, by identify that the children of 1 are 1.1a, 1.1b, 1.2, and occasionally there will be an "upgraded" version of a node, and it will be indexed by a plus, i.e. 1+, 1.1a+. I understand that these things need to be done manually, but is it possible to make the script assume that the indexing for the children of a node should be normal, before I manually edit it?
Related question: Is there a way to make "close siblings"?
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions