Update detectors summary documentation

[JamieMagee]

This page hasn't been updated in a while, so I took some time to make sure it reflects the current state of the codebase.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 90.2%. Comparing base (f28ac75) to head (570b1b3).
⚠️ Report is 4 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files

@@          Coverage Diff          @@
##            main   #1538   +/-   ##
=====================================
  Coverage   90.2%   90.2%           
=====================================
  Files        423     423           
  Lines      35452   35452           
  Branches    2207    2207           
=====================================
+ Hits       31996   31997    +1     
  Misses      3001    3001           
+ Partials     455     454    -1     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

[Copilot]

Pull Request Overview

This PR updates the detector summary documentation to reflect the current state of the codebase. The documentation had become outdated and needed corrections to detector names, statuses, and the addition of new detectors.

• Updated detector names to match actual class names in the codebase (e.g., MavenCliComponentDetector → MvnCliComponentDetector, DockerFileDetector → DockerfileComponentDetector)
• Added newly implemented detectors (Conan, DotNet, Swift, and Uv)
• Corrected detector statuses to reflect their implementation (DefaultOff, Stable, or Experimental)

[github-actions]

👋 Hi! It looks like you modified some files in the Detectors folder.
You may need to bump the detector versions if any of the following scenarios apply:

• The detector detects more or fewer components than before
• The detector generates different parent/child graph relationships than before
• The detector generates different devDependencies values than before

If none of the above scenarios apply, feel free to ignore this comment 🙂