Skip to content

add detail for . completion#240287

Merged
meganrogge merged 5 commits intomainfrom
merogge/duplicate
Feb 10, 2025
Merged

add detail for . completion#240287
meganrogge merged 5 commits intomainfrom
merogge/duplicate

Conversation

@meganrogge
Copy link
Collaborator

@meganrogge meganrogge commented Feb 10, 2025

fix #234362
Screenshot 2025-02-10 at 2 40 06 PM

@meganrogge meganrogge requested a review from Tyriar February 10, 2025 19:07
@meganrogge meganrogge self-assigned this Feb 10, 2025
@meganrogge meganrogge added this to the February 2025 milestone Feb 10, 2025
@meganrogge meganrogge enabled auto-merge (squash) February 10, 2025 19:08
Tyriar
Tyriar previously requested changes Feb 10, 2025
Copy link
Member

@Tyriar Tyriar left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

For . I think we do actually want the builtin, but it should have more information in this case saying it's an alias for source (we'd need to make sure this is actually correct). The reason I think it's better than the . path is because if you complete it, it would use the source route, not the folder.

@meganrogge meganrogge changed the title filter out builtin . as we provide it in resolveResources add detail for . completion Feb 10, 2025
@meganrogge meganrogge requested a review from Tyriar February 10, 2025 20:40
@meganrogge meganrogge merged commit 3e5674c into main Feb 10, 2025
8 checks passed
@meganrogge meganrogge deleted the merogge/duplicate branch February 10, 2025 21:59
@vs-code-engineering vs-code-engineering bot locked and limited conversation to collaborators Mar 27, 2025
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Terminal suggest: The . builtin should explain what it is in the description

2 participants