Skip to content
This repository was archived by the owner on Sep 26, 2025. It is now read-only.

Conversation

@iceraj
Copy link
Contributor

@iceraj iceraj commented Oct 29, 2014

Issue #4

@coveralls
Copy link

Coverage Status

Changes Unknown when pulling 380b245 on feature/no_lxml into * on develop*.

@coveralls
Copy link

Coverage Status

Coverage remained the same when pulling 380b245 on feature/no_lxml into f26a7f2 on develop.

@coveralls
Copy link

Coverage Status

Coverage remained the same when pulling 4a9468a on feature/no_lxml into f26a7f2 on develop.

@coveralls
Copy link

Coverage Status

Coverage remained the same when pulling d53effb on feature/no_lxml into f26a7f2 on develop.

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

So I take it that the functionality that you were getting from lxml, you can also get from xml.etree, thereby eliminate the need to require the lxml library?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

That is correct. I needed to add XML declaration below, but it produces same functionality. And without need for libxml.
Libxml is native XML library and if we are doing a lot of XML processing it would be worth while, but we can get

@coveralls
Copy link

Coverage Status

Coverage remained the same when pulling e552916 on feature/no_lxml into f26a7f2 on develop.

iceraj added a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 30, 2014
@iceraj iceraj merged commit ea64365 into develop Oct 30, 2014
@iceraj iceraj deleted the feature/no_lxml branch October 30, 2014 13:50
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants