Skip to content

Conversation

hpsun1109
Copy link
Contributor

@hpsun1109 hpsun1109 commented Sep 10, 2025

PR type

  • Bug Fix
  • New Feature
  • Document Updates
  • More Models or Datasets Support

PR information

Write the detail information belongs to this PR.

Experiment results

Paste your experiment result here(if needed).

Copy link
Contributor

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Summary of Changes

Hello @hpsun1109, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

This pull request extends the system's compatibility to include the Seed-OSS-36B-Instruct model. The primary change involves updating a configuration file to properly process and disregard specific textual patterns generated by this new model, ensuring seamless integration and operation.

Highlights

  • New Model Support: Added support for the Seed-OSS-36B-Instruct model by updating the ignore_empty_think.json configuration file.
  • Configuration Update: A new regex pattern was introduced in ignore_empty_think.json to specifically handle and ignore certain thinking budget reflection text from the newly supported model.
Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point in your pull request via creating an issue comment (i.e. comment on the pull request page) using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands.

Feature Command Description
Code Review /gemini review Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary /gemini summary Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment @gemini-code-assist Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in issue comments and review comments.
Help /gemini help Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.

Footnotes

  1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution.

Copy link
Contributor

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Review

This pull request aims to add support for the Seed-OSS-36B-Instruct model. The change modifies a JSON configuration file to ignore a specific "think" block during loss calculation. However, the modification introduces a syntax error in the JSON file by including unescaped newline characters in a string, which will cause the application to fail when parsing this file. This is a critical issue that needs to be addressed.

@hpsun1109
Copy link
Contributor Author

@Jintao-Huang 适配Seed-OSS-36B-Instruct budget=0时ignore_empty_think参数

@tastelikefeet tastelikefeet merged commit ca7d109 into modelscope:main Sep 11, 2025
1 of 2 checks passed
Jintao-Huang pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 15, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants