Skip to content

Conversation

Jintao-Huang
Copy link
Collaborator

No description provided.

Copy link
Contributor

Summary of Changes

Hello @Jintao-Huang, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

This pull request addresses a compatibility bug within the inference backend selection logic. Previously, a specific argument, reranker_use_activation, was unconditionally passed to all inference engines. This fix modifies the system to only include this argument when the selected backend is either PyTorch or vLLM, thereby preventing issues with other backends like lmdeploy that do not recognize or utilize this parameter.

Highlights

  • Conditional Argument Passing: The reranker_use_activation argument is now conditionally passed to the inference engine. It will only be included if the infer_backend is explicitly set to 'pt' (PyTorch) or 'vllm'.
  • Bug Fix for lmdeploy Compatibility: This change resolves a bug where reranker_use_activation was being passed to the lmdeploy backend, which does not support this argument, leading to potential errors or unexpected behavior.
Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands on the current page.

Feature Command Description
Code Review /gemini review Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary /gemini summary Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment @gemini-code-assist Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in pull request comments and review comments.
Help /gemini help Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.

Footnotes

  1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution.

Copy link
Contributor

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Review

This pull request addresses a bug where the reranker_use_activation parameter was incorrectly passed to all inference backends, leading to errors with unsupported backends like lmdeploy. The fix correctly isolates this parameter, ensuring it is only passed to the pt and vllm backends that utilize it. The change is well-targeted and effectively resolves the issue. The implementation is clean and I have no further suggestions.

@Jintao-Huang Jintao-Huang merged commit c11532f into modelscope:main Sep 24, 2025
1 of 2 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

using swift infer with lmdeploy backend got unexpected argument error.

1 participant