-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 903
[megatron] fix megatron-swift seq_cls #6115
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[megatron] fix megatron-swift seq_cls #6115
Conversation
Summary of ChangesHello @Jintao-Huang, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed! This pull request addresses a bug in the Highlights
Using Gemini Code AssistThe full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips. Invoking Gemini You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either
Customization To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a Limitations & Feedback Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here. You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension. Footnotes
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Code Review
This pull request fixes an issue in sequence classification tasks when using sequence parallelism. The change correctly reorders the operations to gather the hidden_states
before applying the output layer. My review points out a performance consideration with this approach and suggests exploring a more optimized solution to maintain efficiency while ensuring correctness.
if args.sequence_parallel and args.tensor_model_parallel_size > 1: | ||
logits = gather_from_sequence_parallel_region(logits) | ||
hidden_states = gather_from_sequence_parallel_region(hidden_states) | ||
logits = self.output_layer(hidden_states)[0] |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This change appears to fix a correctness issue for sequence classification with sequence parallelism by gathering hidden_states
before the output_layer
. While this ensures correctness, it may introduce a performance regression.
The new implementation involves:
- An
all_gather
operation on the potentially largehidden_states
tensor. - Redundant computation of the
output_layer
on all tensor parallel ranks, since each now computes the fulllogits
.
The previous implementation gathered the smaller logits
tensor, which was more efficient in terms of communication and avoided redundant computation.
If sequence classification relies only on the hidden state of a single token (e.g., the last one), could we consider a more optimized approach? For example:
- Compute the logit only on the rank that holds the required token's hidden state.
- Broadcast the resulting logit to all other ranks.
This would be more efficient in both communication and computation. If feasible, it would be a valuable optimization.
No description provided.