TUNE-449 Fix a potential duration overflow #1530
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
isabelatkinson
previously approved these changes
Nov 18, 2025
abr-egn
force-pushed
the
TUNE-449/duration-overflow
branch
from
014d050 to
e2d1670
Compare
isabelatkinson
approved these changes
Nov 18, 2025
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
TUNE-449
I did a search over the rest of the driver codebase and couldn't find any other examples of this particular mis-pattern. That said, it's hard to be certain because we use
Durationall over the place and math can be formatted in a lot of different ways.