Skip to content

Conversation

@rami3l
Copy link
Contributor

@rami3l rami3l commented Apr 10, 2025

No description provided.

@peter-jerry-ye-code-review
Copy link

peter-jerry-ye-code-review bot commented Apr 10, 2025

Package name string literal should be consistent with project conventions

Category
Correctness
Code Snippet
package "rami3l/js-ffi/js"
Recommendation
Verify if package names should be quoted. If not, revert to: package rami3l/js-ffi/js
Reasoning
The addition of quotes around the package name seems inconsistent with other files in the project. Need to ensure this follows the language's package declaration syntax requirements.

Missing documentation for new Object::to_value method

Category
Maintainability
Code Snippet
pub fn Object::to_value(self : Object) -> Value { self._ }
Recommendation
Add documentation comment explaining the purpose and behavior of to_value method:

/// Converts an Object instance back to its underlying Value representation
pub fn Object::to_value(self : Object) -> Value { self._ }```
**Reasoning**
All public APIs should be documented to improve code maintainability and usability. The purpose of this conversion method should be clear to users of the library.

</details>
<details>

<summary> Test case uses implicit value conversion that could mask errors </summary>

**Category**
Correctness
**Code Snippet**
let obj = @js.Object::from_value_unchecked(@json.from_json!({ "a": 1, "b": 2, "c": 3 }))
**Recommendation**
Consider using the safe `from_value` method and handle the Optional result explicitly:
```moonbit
let obj = match @js.Object::from_value(@json.from_json!({ "a": 1, "b": 2, "c": 3 })) {
  Some(o) => o,
  None => panic("Invalid object conversion")
}```
**Reasoning**
Using unchecked conversion in tests could hide potential runtime errors. Tests should validate proper error handling unless there's a specific reason to use unsafe operations.

</details>

@rami3l rami3l merged commit 05383c1 into main Apr 10, 2025
4 checks passed
@rami3l rami3l deleted the dev branch April 10, 2025 02:49
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants