-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 64
Add note about the behavior of the id function on composite databases #161
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add note about the behavior of the id function on composite databases #161
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I would have moved this one to the first line, so that it says:
On <<composite-databases, composite databases>> the `id()` function should be used with caution. Instead, it is recommended to use <<functions-element-id, `elementId()`>>.
d9997e4 to
282e537
Compare
|
Looks like you've updated the documentation! Check out your changes at https://neo4j-docs-cypher-161.surge.sh |
282e537 to
14db106
Compare
JPryce-Aklundh
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM! (Just a small suggestion)
d6c97aa to
121a5db
Compare
No description provided.