Skip to content

Conversation

@Hunterness
Copy link
Collaborator

An order was introduced when it was restructured, might be good to keep that order.

Affects sections:

  • 5.8
  • 5.7
  • 5.6 (was for some reason split in two tables where it should have been one)
  • 5.5

…order on the subsections

An order was introduced when it was restructured, might be good to keep that order.

Added a comment at the top about the expected order.
@Hunterness Hunterness added team-cypher-operations Cypher operations should review this dev labels May 23, 2023
@neo-technology-commit-status-publisher
Copy link
Collaborator

Looks like you've updated the documentation!

Check out your changes at https://neo4j-docs-cypher-568.surge.sh

Copy link
Collaborator

@JPryce-Aklundh JPryce-Aklundh left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks a lot, @Hunterness - looks great!

@JPryce-Aklundh JPryce-Aklundh merged commit 391433b into neo4j:dev May 23, 2023
JPryce-Aklundh added a commit that referenced this pull request May 23, 2023
…order on the subsections (#569)

Original PR: #568

authored-by: Therese Magnusson <therese.magnusson@neotechnology.com>
lidiazuin pushed a commit to lidiazuin/docs-cypher that referenced this pull request May 21, 2025
…order on the subsections (neo4j#569)

Original PR: neo4j#568

authored-by: Therese Magnusson <therese.magnusson@neotechnology.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

dev team-cypher-operations Cypher operations should review this

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants