-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 83
Describe new lighthouse procedures #1694
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
| [cols="<15s,<85"] | ||
| |=== | ||
| | Description | ||
| a| This procedure allows you to select which discovery service should be started. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Is it worth adding a note like "Note that transitions must be done in order, which means it is not possible to switch to V2_OVER_V1 when current server is in V1_ONLY, the server must first go be switched to V1_OVER_V2
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think we don't need to do this because other procedures don't describe their contract in this document(correct me if I'm wrong). Also If a customer tries to do illegal transitions, this procedure will crash and print an informative message about the right transition. You can find what message will be printed here com.neo4j.causalclustering.discovery.parallel.ParallelTopologyService#switchMode.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Looks good, other than one suggestion
Co-authored-by: NataliaIvakina <82437520+NataliaIvakina@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: NataliaIvakina <82437520+NataliaIvakina@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: NataliaIvakina <82437520+NataliaIvakina@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: NataliaIvakina <82437520+NataliaIvakina@users.noreply.github.com>
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The descriptions look very good but should be the same in the codebase. Otherwise, our test will fail.
Co-authored-by: Reneta Popova <reneta.popova@neo4j.com>
Co-authored-by: Reneta Popova <reneta.popova@neo4j.com>
|
Thanks for the documentation updates. The preview documentation has now been torn down - reopening this PR will republish it. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Perfect
@yirensum additional context - https://neo4j.atlassian.net/wiki/spaces/Cluster/pages/511606802/Lighthouse+GA+plan