Skip to content

Conversation

@Lojjs
Copy link
Contributor

@Lojjs Lojjs commented May 23, 2025

Corresponding Neo4j PR: https://github.com/neo-technology/neo4j/pull/31193

I tried to follow the same pattern as for 22NB9, but I did not know if it made sense to write out the status description in the example, given that it does not have any parameters.

Also note, that while the Neo4j PR will be included in 2025.06, the vector feature is still under a feature flag so I am not entirely sure about the version for this docs PR

Copy link
Contributor

@Hunterness Hunterness left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@renetapopova renetapopova self-assigned this May 27, 2025
Copy link
Collaborator

@renetapopova renetapopova left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good to me. I'll regenerate the index file when the time comes and merge it. Thank you both.

@renetapopova renetapopova merged commit 3b19ee9 into neo4j:dev Jun 5, 2025
4 checks passed
@neo4j-docops-agent
Copy link
Collaborator

neo4j-docops-agent commented Jun 5, 2025

Thanks for the documentation updates.

The preview documentation has now been torn down - reopening this PR will republish it.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants