Skip to content

Conversation

@robsdedude
Copy link
Member

No description provided.

Copy link
Contributor

@AndyHeap-NeoTech AndyHeap-NeoTech left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

That looks great. Would it be worth commenting/highlighting the changes that have been made and why they were necessary? Just so people understand the reason for the code snippets being present in the way they are.

@robsdedude
Copy link
Member Author

The comments for the respective code snippets already mention what was changed. Would you like those comments to elaborate a little more?

@AndyHeap-NeoTech
Copy link
Contributor

Me having a brain failure. Had a reread. All is good!

@robsdedude robsdedude merged commit 9cfa4c8 into neo4j:5.0 Dec 16, 2022
@robsdedude robsdedude deleted the more-explicit-licensing branch December 16, 2022 10:07
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants