-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 705
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Dev -> Master for v3.10 release #914
Conversation
Update modules to latest restructuring on nf-core/modules
Important! Template update for nf-core/tools v2.6
Because I just found out about these and want to try them out somewhere.
Fancy GitHub blockquote admonitions
Fix SAMTOOLS_INDEX output
clarification of star and salmon outputs from issue #722
nf-core subworkflows install
Add 'auto' option to auto-detect strandedness
FInal pre-release fixes
update subway map
|
Remove last meta map clone
Bump pipeline version to v3.10 and other small tweaks
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Monster merge, but I'm happy with all of the commits that comprised this PR. We're also running a full-sized test now, and will update here with the results.
} | ||
.groupTuple(by: [0]) | ||
.groupTuple() |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
what about using size
here so the tuple advances as soon as possible?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Good question! I'll leave @robsyme to comment here. Asked him exactly the same question.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Good question.
To emit asap, we'd need to calculate the number of technical replicates at an earlier stage - probably during samplesheet validation. This is certainly possible, but because there are no long-running processes between samplesheet generation and this grouping operation, there is no real speedup to be gained.
I'm a huge fan of using groupKey as often as possible, but in this case there is no advantage.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Ok makes sense.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
looks good :) Maybe someone with a little more in depth knowledge of what the pipeline does should approve though :)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Looks good to me now! Not deep into rnaseq analysis, but I suppose the features were discussed beforehand on slack.
🥳 |
No description provided.