Skip to content

Conversation

@dixonjoel
Copy link
Collaborator

@dixonjoel dixonjoel commented Aug 15, 2025

What does this Pull Request accomplish?

Now that [ni.measurementlink.proto] is available as a package, pull it in to the measurement.v1 and measurement.v2 dependencies. Also include a local path to the ni.measurementlink.proto package for when we want to test with that source.

Why should this Pull Request be merged?

Ultimately, we want to use these packages in measurement-plugin-python so we can single-source these generated stubs in packages.

What testing has been done?

Build passes. Will use these packages in measurement-plugin-python to test.

@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Aug 15, 2025

Test Results

   46 files  +20     46 suites  +20   31s ⏱️ +3s
  144 tests + 8    144 ✅ + 8  0 💤 ±0  0 ❌ ±0 
1 424 runs  +80  1 424 ✅ +80  0 💤 ±0  0 ❌ ±0 

Results for commit 36e42a6. ± Comparison against base commit e81de6f.

♻️ This comment has been updated with latest results.

@dixonjoel dixonjoel changed the title [DRAFT] Use the new ni.measurementlink.proto package in the ni.measurementlink.measurement.v*.proto packages Use the new ni.measurementlink.proto package in the ni.measurementlink.measurement.v*.proto packages Aug 18, 2025
@dixonjoel dixonjoel requested a review from bkeryan August 18, 2025 15:31
Copy link
Collaborator

@bkeryan bkeryan left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Approved, once you get the __init__.py docstrings sorted out

@dixonjoel dixonjoel merged commit dd4b040 into main Aug 18, 2025
36 checks passed
@dixonjoel dixonjoel deleted the users/jdixon/use-measurementlink-proto-package branch August 18, 2025 19:26
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants