-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 19
fix: switch to using crypto random for boundary values #28
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
WalkthroughThe updates include changes to the GitHub Actions CI workflow to support the Changes
Sequence Diagram(s)sequenceDiagram
participant User
participant FormStream
participant Crypto
User->>FormStream: Initiate multipart form
FormStream->>Crypto: Generate 12 random bytes
Crypto-->>FormStream: Return random bytes
FormStream->>FormStream: Create boundary using random hex string
FormStream-->>User: Use boundary in form-data content-type
Estimated code review effort🎯 2 (Simple) | ⏱️ ~8 minutes Poem
Note ⚡️ Unit Test Generation is now available in beta!Learn more here, or try it out under "Finishing Touches" below. 📜 Recent review detailsConfiguration used: CodeRabbit UI 📒 Files selected for processing (5)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (1)
🔇 Additional comments (11)
✨ Finishing Touches
🧪 Generate unit tests
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
SupportNeed help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions. Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Summary of Changes
Hello @fengmk2, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!
This pull request primarily focuses on enhancing the security and robustness of multipart form data boundary generation by switching from a basic Math.random() approach to using Node.js's crypto module. This change ensures that the boundaries are cryptographically strong and less predictable, aligning with modern security practices for data transmission. Additionally, it includes updates to the project's contributor display in the README and related build scripts.
Highlights
- Enhanced Boundary Generation: The method for generating multipart form data boundaries in
lib/formstream.jshas been updated to utilizecrypto.randomBytes(12).toString('hex'). This replaces the previousMath.random()based approach, providing a more secure and unique boundary string, aligning with best practices from theform-datalibrary. - Test Suite Adjustments: The regular expressions in
test/formstream.test.jsused to validate content-type headers have been updated from matching only digits (\d{24}) to matching word characters (\w{24}) to correctly reflect the hexadecimal output of the new boundary generation method. - Contributor Display Modernization: The
README.mdhas been updated to usecontrib.rocksfor dynamically displaying contributors, replacing the staticgit-contributorgenerated list. Correspondingly, thegit-contributorscript and dependency have been removed frompackage.json.
Using Gemini Code Assist
The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.
Invoking Gemini
You can request assistance from Gemini at any point in your pull request via creating an issue comment (i.e. comment on the pull request page) using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands.
| Feature | Command | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Code Review | /gemini review |
Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state. |
| Pull Request Summary | /gemini summary |
Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state. |
| Comment | @gemini-code-assist | Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in issue comments and review comments. |
| Help | /gemini help |
Displays a list of available commands. |
Customization
To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.
Limitations & Feedback
Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments or fill out our survey to provide feedback.
You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.
Footnotes
-
Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution. ↩
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Pull Request Overview
This PR switches from using Math.random() to crypto.randomBytes() for generating multipart form-data boundary values, improving cryptographic security. It also includes some maintenance updates to the project.
- Replaces pseudo-random boundary generation with cryptographically secure random generation
- Updates test regex patterns to match the new hexadecimal boundary format
- Removes deprecated git-contributor dependency and updates contributor display
Reviewed Changes
Copilot reviewed 5 out of 5 changed files in this pull request and generated no comments.
Show a summary per file
| File | Description |
|---|---|
| lib/formstream.js | Replaces Math.random() boundary generation with crypto.randomBytes() for security |
| test/formstream.test.js | Updates regex patterns from \d{24} to \w{24} to match hex boundary format |
| package.json | Removes git-contributor dependency and related npm script |
| README.md | Replaces git-contributor generated content with contrib.rocks badge |
| .github/workflows/ci.yml | Adds Node.js 24 to test matrix and merge_group trigger |
Comments suppressed due to low confidence (5)
test/formstream.test.js:249
- The regex pattern
\w{24}matches alphanumeric characters and underscores, butcrypto.randomBytes(12).toString('hex')only generates hexadecimal characters (0-9, a-f). The pattern should be[0-9a-f]{24}to accurately match the actual boundary format.
.with.match(/multipart\/form-data; boundary=--------------------------\w{24}/);
test/formstream.test.js:291
- The regex pattern
\w{24}matches alphanumeric characters and underscores, butcrypto.randomBytes(12).toString('hex')only generates hexadecimal characters (0-9, a-f). The pattern should be[0-9a-f]{24}to accurately match the actual boundary format.
.with.match(/multipart\/form-data; boundary=--------------------------\w{24}/);
test/formstream.test.js:326
- The regex pattern
\w{24}matches alphanumeric characters and underscores, butcrypto.randomBytes(12).toString('hex')only generates hexadecimal characters (0-9, a-f). The pattern should be[0-9a-f]{24}to accurately match the actual boundary format.
.with.match(/^multipart\/form-data; boundary=--------------------------\w{24}$/);
test/formstream.test.js:354
- The regex pattern
\w{24}matches alphanumeric characters and underscores, butcrypto.randomBytes(12).toString('hex')only generates hexadecimal characters (0-9, a-f). The pattern should be[0-9a-f]{24}to accurately match the actual boundary format.
.with.match(/^multipart\/form-data; boundary=--------------------------\w{24}$/);
test/formstream.test.js:451
- The regex pattern
\w{24}matches alphanumeric characters and underscores, butcrypto.randomBytes(12).toString('hex')only generates hexadecimal characters (0-9, a-f). The pattern should be[0-9a-f]{24}to accurately match the actual boundary format.
headers['Content-Type'].should.match(/^multipart\/form-data; boundary=--------------------------\w{24}$/);
Codecov Report✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests. Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #28 +/- ##
==========================================
- Coverage 98.24% 98.21% -0.03%
==========================================
Files 1 1
Lines 399 393 -6
Branches 59 58 -1
==========================================
- Hits 392 386 -6
Misses 7 7 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. 🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Code Review
This pull request enhances security by replacing Math.random() with crypto.randomBytes for generating multipart form boundaries. The test regular expressions could be more specific to improve their long-term robustness.
[skip ci] ## [1.5.2](v1.5.1...v1.5.2) (2025-07-29) ### Bug Fixes * switch to using crypto random for boundary values ([#28](#28)) ([ace05e0](ace05e0))
form-data/form-data@3d17230
Summary by CodeRabbit