Skip to content

Conversation

@fengmk2
Copy link
Member

@fengmk2 fengmk2 commented Jul 29, 2025

form-data/form-data@3d17230

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Chores
    • Updated continuous integration workflow to include additional Node.js version and new event triggers.
    • Removed contributor management scripts and dependencies from project configuration.
  • Documentation
    • Simplified the contributors section in the documentation with a dynamic badge and removed the static contributors table.
  • Refactor
    • Improved multipart form boundary generation for enhanced security and simplicity.
  • Tests
    • Updated test assertions to support a broader range of boundary formats in multipart form-data headers.

@fengmk2 fengmk2 requested a review from Copilot July 29, 2025 01:20
@coderabbitai
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Jul 29, 2025

Walkthrough

The updates include changes to the GitHub Actions CI workflow to support the merge_group event and test against Node.js 24, a simplification of the contributors section in the README, an internal improvement to multipart boundary string generation using cryptographic randomness, removal of contributor management tooling from package.json, and corresponding test updates to accept the new boundary format.

Changes

Cohort / File(s) Change Summary
CI Workflow Update
.github/workflows/ci.yml
Updated CI workflow to trigger on merge_group events and added Node.js 24 to the test matrix.
Contributors Section Simplification
README.md
Replaced manual contributor table with a dynamic badge from contrib.rocks and removed static metadata.
Boundary Generation Security
lib/formstream.js
Replaced manual random boundary generation with cryptographically secure random bytes using Node.js crypto module.
Contributor Tooling Removal
package.json
Removed contributor script and git-contributor devDependency.
Test Updates for Boundary Format
test/formstream.test.js
Updated regex in tests to accept alphanumeric boundaries instead of strictly numeric ones.

Sequence Diagram(s)

sequenceDiagram
    participant User
    participant FormStream
    participant Crypto

    User->>FormStream: Initiate multipart form
    FormStream->>Crypto: Generate 12 random bytes
    Crypto-->>FormStream: Return random bytes
    FormStream->>FormStream: Create boundary using random hex string
    FormStream-->>User: Use boundary in form-data content-type
Loading

Estimated code review effort

🎯 2 (Simple) | ⏱️ ~8 minutes

Poem

🐇
A sprinkle of crypto, a badge that glows,
Boundaries stronger wherever it goes.
Contributors now on a badge parade,
While scripts and old tables quietly fade.
CI grows wiser, tests keep in line—
Hopping ahead, the code’s looking fine!

Note

⚡️ Unit Test Generation is now available in beta!

Learn more here, or try it out under "Finishing Touches" below.


📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 38b2623 and c503ab9.

📒 Files selected for processing (5)
  • .github/workflows/ci.yml (1 hunks)
  • README.md (1 hunks)
  • lib/formstream.js (2 hunks)
  • package.json (1 hunks)
  • test/formstream.test.js (5 hunks)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (1)
  • GitHub Check: Node.js / Test (macos-latest, 24)
🔇 Additional comments (11)
package.json (1)

16-16: No visible changes to review.

The line appears unchanged despite being marked. The AI summary mentions removal of contributor-related dependencies, but these changes are not visible in the provided code.

Likely an incorrect or invalid review comment.

.github/workflows/ci.yml (2)

8-8: LGTM! Good addition for GitHub merge queues.

Adding the merge_group trigger ensures CI runs on merge queue events, which is a best practice for repositories using GitHub's merge queue feature.


16-16: LGTM! Good to test against the latest Node.js version.

Adding Node.js 24 to the test matrix ensures compatibility with the latest LTS and current releases.

README.md (1)

209-211: LGTM! Good simplification of contributor management.

Replacing the static contributor table with a dynamic badge from contrib.rocks reduces maintenance overhead and automatically keeps the contributor list current.

lib/formstream.js (2)

38-38: LGTM! Necessary import for cryptographic random generation.

Adding the crypto module import to support the secure boundary generation.


75-77: Excellent security improvement! Cryptographically secure boundary generation.

This change replaces the predictable Math.random() approach with cryptographically secure crypto.randomBytes(12), generating a 24-character hexadecimal boundary. This follows the same pattern as the form-data library and significantly improves security by making boundaries unpredictable.

The boundary format changes from 24 digits (\d{24}) to 24 hexadecimal characters ([0-9a-f]{24}), which is properly handled by the updated tests.

test/formstream.test.js (5)

249-249: LGTM! Correct regex update for new boundary format.

Updated the boundary pattern from \d{24} to \w{24} to match the new hexadecimal boundary format generated by crypto.randomBytes(12).toString('hex').


291-291: LGTM! Consistent regex update.

Properly updated the boundary validation pattern to match the new cryptographic boundary format.


326-326: LGTM! Consistent regex update with proper anchoring.

The regex includes proper start (^) and end ($) anchors to ensure exact matching of the boundary format.


354-354: LGTM! Consistent regex update.

Another properly updated boundary validation pattern matching the new format.


451-451: LGTM! Headers test properly updated.

The headers test correctly validates the new boundary format in the Content-Type header.

✨ Finishing Touches
  • 📝 Generate Docstrings
🧪 Generate unit tests
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Post copyable unit tests in a comment
  • Commit unit tests in branch fix-random-boundary

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Explain this complex logic.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai explain this code block.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and explain its main purpose.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Support

Need help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate sequence diagram to generate a sequence diagram of the changes in this PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate unit tests to generate unit tests for this PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Summary of Changes

Hello @fengmk2, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

This pull request primarily focuses on enhancing the security and robustness of multipart form data boundary generation by switching from a basic Math.random() approach to using Node.js's crypto module. This change ensures that the boundaries are cryptographically strong and less predictable, aligning with modern security practices for data transmission. Additionally, it includes updates to the project's contributor display in the README and related build scripts.

Highlights

  • Enhanced Boundary Generation: The method for generating multipart form data boundaries in lib/formstream.js has been updated to utilize crypto.randomBytes(12).toString('hex'). This replaces the previous Math.random() based approach, providing a more secure and unique boundary string, aligning with best practices from the form-data library.
  • Test Suite Adjustments: The regular expressions in test/formstream.test.js used to validate content-type headers have been updated from matching only digits (\d{24}) to matching word characters (\w{24}) to correctly reflect the hexadecimal output of the new boundary generation method.
  • Contributor Display Modernization: The README.md has been updated to use contrib.rocks for dynamically displaying contributors, replacing the static git-contributor generated list. Correspondingly, the git-contributor script and dependency have been removed from package.json.
Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point in your pull request via creating an issue comment (i.e. comment on the pull request page) using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands.

Feature Command Description
Code Review /gemini review Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary /gemini summary Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment @gemini-code-assist Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in issue comments and review comments.
Help /gemini help Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments or fill out our survey to provide feedback.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.

Footnotes

  1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution.

Copy link

Copilot AI left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull Request Overview

This PR switches from using Math.random() to crypto.randomBytes() for generating multipart form-data boundary values, improving cryptographic security. It also includes some maintenance updates to the project.

  • Replaces pseudo-random boundary generation with cryptographically secure random generation
  • Updates test regex patterns to match the new hexadecimal boundary format
  • Removes deprecated git-contributor dependency and updates contributor display

Reviewed Changes

Copilot reviewed 5 out of 5 changed files in this pull request and generated no comments.

Show a summary per file
File Description
lib/formstream.js Replaces Math.random() boundary generation with crypto.randomBytes() for security
test/formstream.test.js Updates regex patterns from \d{24} to \w{24} to match hex boundary format
package.json Removes git-contributor dependency and related npm script
README.md Replaces git-contributor generated content with contrib.rocks badge
.github/workflows/ci.yml Adds Node.js 24 to test matrix and merge_group trigger
Comments suppressed due to low confidence (5)

test/formstream.test.js:249

  • The regex pattern \w{24} matches alphanumeric characters and underscores, but crypto.randomBytes(12).toString('hex') only generates hexadecimal characters (0-9, a-f). The pattern should be [0-9a-f]{24} to accurately match the actual boundary format.
        .with.match(/multipart\/form-data; boundary=--------------------------\w{24}/);

test/formstream.test.js:291

  • The regex pattern \w{24} matches alphanumeric characters and underscores, but crypto.randomBytes(12).toString('hex') only generates hexadecimal characters (0-9, a-f). The pattern should be [0-9a-f]{24} to accurately match the actual boundary format.
        .with.match(/multipart\/form-data; boundary=--------------------------\w{24}/);

test/formstream.test.js:326

  • The regex pattern \w{24} matches alphanumeric characters and underscores, but crypto.randomBytes(12).toString('hex') only generates hexadecimal characters (0-9, a-f). The pattern should be [0-9a-f]{24} to accurately match the actual boundary format.
        .with.match(/^multipart\/form-data; boundary=--------------------------\w{24}$/);

test/formstream.test.js:354

  • The regex pattern \w{24} matches alphanumeric characters and underscores, but crypto.randomBytes(12).toString('hex') only generates hexadecimal characters (0-9, a-f). The pattern should be [0-9a-f]{24} to accurately match the actual boundary format.
          .with.match(/^multipart\/form-data; boundary=--------------------------\w{24}$/);

test/formstream.test.js:451

  • The regex pattern \w{24} matches alphanumeric characters and underscores, but crypto.randomBytes(12).toString('hex') only generates hexadecimal characters (0-9, a-f). The pattern should be [0-9a-f]{24} to accurately match the actual boundary format.
      headers['Content-Type'].should.match(/^multipart\/form-data; boundary=--------------------------\w{24}$/);

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Jul 29, 2025

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 98.21%. Comparing base (9f771e8) to head (c503ab9).
⚠️ Report is 2 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master      #28      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   98.24%   98.21%   -0.03%     
==========================================
  Files           1        1              
  Lines         399      393       -6     
  Branches       59       58       -1     
==========================================
- Hits          392      386       -6     
  Misses          7        7              

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
  • 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

Copy link

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Review

This pull request enhances security by replacing Math.random() with crypto.randomBytes for generating multipart form boundaries. The test regular expressions could be more specific to improve their long-term robustness.

@fengmk2 fengmk2 merged commit ace05e0 into master Jul 29, 2025
32 of 33 checks passed
@fengmk2 fengmk2 deleted the fix-random-boundary branch July 29, 2025 01:25
fengmk2 pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 29, 2025
[skip ci]

## [1.5.2](v1.5.1...v1.5.2) (2025-07-29)

### Bug Fixes

* switch to using crypto random for boundary values ([#28](#28)) ([ace05e0](ace05e0))
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants