Skip to content

Conversation

@mpppk
Copy link
Collaborator

@mpppk mpppk commented Sep 16, 2024

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Introduced a new test suite for validating API endpoint specifications to ensure reliability and expected behavior.
    • Added a new function for retrieving API specifications based on path and method.
    • Enhanced validation in the newValibotValidator and newZodValidator functions to ensure only valid HTTP methods are processed.
  • Bug Fixes

    • Enhanced type safety for method parameters in API validation functions, reducing potential errors from invalid inputs.

@coderabbitai
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Sep 16, 2024

Caution

Review failed

The pull request is closed.

Walkthrough

The changes introduced in this pull request focus on enhancing the functionality and type safety of the API specification logic. A new test suite for the getApiSpec function has been added, validating various scenarios related to API paths and methods. Additionally, modifications to type constraints for the method parameter in several functions improve type safety by ensuring only valid HTTP methods are accepted, while removing runtime checks to streamline the code. Furthermore, validation steps for HTTP methods have been incorporated in related validator functions.

Changes

Files Change Summary
src/common/validate.ts - Added getApiSpec(spec: AnyApiEndpoints, path: string, method: string) function.
- Modified type constraints for method in validateMethod, validatePathAndMethod, and getApiSpec to ensure only valid HTTP methods are accepted. Removed runtime checks in validateMethod.
src/common/validate.test.ts - Introduced a test suite for getApiSpec to validate API endpoint specifications across various scenarios.
src/valibot/index.ts - Added validation for HTTP method in newValibotValidator, ensuring only valid methods are processed.
src/zod/index.ts - Enhanced newZodValidator to validate HTTP methods before calling getApiSpec.
.idea/typed-api-spec.iml - Excluded coverage folder from IDE indexing.

Possibly related PRs

  • Add test and rewrite asAsync #66: This PR introduces a new function isMethod in src/common/spec.ts, enhancing type safety by ensuring that only valid methods are recognized.
  • Refine type #79: This PR refines type definitions related to API specifications, aligning with modifications to the getApiSpec function and its response handling.
  • Add responses to API schema #89: This PR restructures the response format for API endpoints, complementing the focus on validating API endpoint specifications in the main PR.

Poem

In the code where rabbits hop,
New tests for APIs now won't stop.
With types so clear, and paths defined,
Our methods safe, no bugs to find.
Let's celebrate with a joyful cheer,
For clean code brings us all good cheer! 🐇✨


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share
Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    -- I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    -- Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    -- @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    -- @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    -- @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.
    -- @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    -- @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    -- @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
src/common/validate.test.ts (1)

1-34: Great job on the test suite!

The test suite provides good coverage for the getApiSpec function by testing the happy path and error scenarios. The test cases are well-structured and easy to understand.

Here are a few suggestions for improvement:

  • Consider adding more test cases for edge cases and boundary conditions, such as:
    • Test case for a path that exists but has no methods defined.
    • Test case for a path that has multiple methods defined.
    • Test case for a path that has a trailing slash.
  • Consider adding a test case for a path that has query parameters or path parameters.
  • Consider adding a test case for a path that has a non-string value.
Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 9d8995c and 944986d.

Files selected for processing (2)
  • src/common/validate.test.ts (1 hunks)
  • src/common/validate.ts (4 hunks)
Additional comments not posted (5)
src/common/validate.test.ts (1)

1-3: Verify the import statements.

The import statements look good. However, ensure that the getApiSpec function is exported correctly from src/common/validate.ts and the AnyApiEndpoints type is exported correctly from src/common/spec.ts.

Run the following script to verify the import statements:

Verification successful

To fully verify the import statements and resolve the discrepancy with the getApiSpec function, we need to gather more information. Let's run additional scripts to investigate further.


Import statements are correct and properly aligned with exports

The verification process has confirmed that all import statements in the test file (src/common/validate.test.ts) are correct and properly aligned with the exports in their respective source files:

  • getApiSpec is correctly exported as a constant from src/common/validate.ts.
  • AnyApiEndpoints is correctly exported as a type from src/common/spec.ts.

No issues were found during the verification process, and the import statements can be considered valid.

Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the import statements.

# Test 1: Search for the `getApiSpec` function export in `src/common/validate.ts`.
# Expect: The function is exported.
ast-grep --lang typescript --pattern $'export function getApiSpec($_) {
  $$$
}' src/common/validate.ts

# Test 2: Search for the `AnyApiEndpoints` type export in `src/common/spec.ts`.
# Expect: The type is exported.
ast-grep --lang typescript --pattern $'export type AnyApiEndpoints = $_' src/common/spec.ts

Length of output: 287


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Further investigation of getApiSpec export and validate.ts content

# Test 1: Search for different export syntaxes of getApiSpec
echo "Searching for different export syntaxes of getApiSpec:"
ast-grep --lang typescript --pattern 'export const getApiSpec = $_' src/common/validate.ts
ast-grep --lang typescript --pattern 'export default function getApiSpec($_) { $$$ }' src/common/validate.ts
ast-grep --lang typescript --pattern 'const getApiSpec = $_; export { getApiSpec }' src/common/validate.ts

# Test 2: Display the content of src/common/validate.ts
echo -e "\nContent of src/common/validate.ts:"
cat src/common/validate.ts

Length of output: 4558

src/common/validate.ts (4)

2-2: LGTM!

The Method type is imported to be used as a type constraint in the validateMethod, validatePathAndMethod, and getApiSpec functions. This change is consistent with the AI-generated summary and improves type safety.


60-60: LGTM!

The method parameter's type is refined to be an intersection of M and Method types. This change ensures that only valid HTTP methods defined in the Method type can be passed to the function, improving type safety. The change is consistent with the AI-generated summary and does not affect the function's logic or behavior.


75-75: LGTM!

The M type parameter is refined to be an intersection of string and Method types. This change ensures that only valid HTTP methods defined in the Method type can be passed to the function, improving type safety. The change is consistent with the AI-generated summary and does not affect the function's logic or behavior.


94-94: LGTM!

The M type parameter is refined to be an intersection of string and Method types. This change ensures that only valid HTTP methods defined in the Method type can be passed to the function, improving type safety. The change is consistent with the AI-generated summary and does not affect the function's logic or behavior.

@mpppk mpppk merged commit cdeb37a into main Sep 16, 2024
@mpppk mpppk deleted the more-test branch September 16, 2024 07:01
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants