build(deps-dev): bump esbuild from 0.17.5 to 0.17.8

[dependabot]

Bumps esbuild from 0.17.5 to 0.17.8.

Release notes

Sourced from esbuild's releases.

v0.17.8

• Fix a minification bug with non-ASCII identifiers (#2910)

  This release fixes a bug with esbuild where non-ASCII identifiers followed by a keyword were incorrectly not separated by a space. This bug affected both the in and instanceof keywords. Here's an example of the fix:

  // Original code
  π in a
  // Old output (with --minify --charset=utf8)
  πin a;
  // New output (with --minify --charset=utf8)
  π in a;

• Fix a regression with esbuild's WebAssembly API in version 0.17.6 (#2911)

  Version 0.17.6 of esbuild updated the Go toolchain to version 1.20.0. This had the unfortunate side effect of increasing the amount of stack space that esbuild uses (presumably due to some changes to Go's WebAssembly implementation) which could cause esbuild's WebAssembly-based API to crash with a stack overflow in cases where it previously didn't crash. One such case is the package grapheme-splitter which contains code that looks like this:

  if (
    (0x0300 <= code && code <= 0x036F) ||
    (0x0483 <= code && code <= 0x0487) ||
    (0x0488 <= code && code <= 0x0489) ||
    (0x0591 <= code && code <= 0x05BD) ||
    // ... many hundreds of lines later ...
  ) {
    return;
  }

  This edge case involves a chain of binary operators that results in an AST over 400 nodes deep. Normally this wouldn't be a problem because Go has growable call stacks, so the call stack would just grow to be as large as needed. However, WebAssembly byte code deliberately doesn't expose the ability to manipulate the stack pointer, so Go's WebAssembly translation is forced to use the fixed-size WebAssembly call stack. So esbuild's WebAssembly implementation is vulnerable to stack overflow in cases like these.

  It's not unreasonable for this to cause a stack overflow, and for esbuild's answer to this problem to be "don't write code like this." That's how many other AST-manipulation tools handle this problem. However, it's possible to implement AST traversal using iteration instead of recursion to work around limited call stack space. This version of esbuild implements this code transformation for esbuild's JavaScript parser and printer, so esbuild's WebAssembly implementation is now able to process the grapheme-splitter package (at least when compiled with Go 1.20.0 and run with node's WebAssembly implementation).

v0.17.7

• Change esbuild's parsing of TypeScript instantiation expressions to match TypeScript 4.8+ (#2907)

  This release updates esbuild's implementation of instantiation expression erasure to match microsoft/TypeScript#49353. The new rules are as follows (copied from TypeScript's PR description):

  When a potential type argument list is followed by

  • a line break,
  • an ( token,
  • a template literal string, or
  • any token except < or > that isn't the start of an expression,

  we consider that construct to be a type argument list. Otherwise we consider the construct to be a < relational expression followed by a > relational expression.

... (truncated)

Changelog

Sourced from esbuild's changelog.

0.17.8

• Fix a minification bug with non-ASCII identifiers (#2910)

  This release fixes a bug with esbuild where non-ASCII identifiers followed by a keyword were incorrectly not separated by a space. This bug affected both the in and instanceof keywords. Here's an example of the fix:

  // Original code
  π in a
  // Old output (with --minify --charset=utf8)
  πin a;
  // New output (with --minify --charset=utf8)
  π in a;

• Fix a regression with esbuild's WebAssembly API in version 0.17.6 (#2911)

  Version 0.17.6 of esbuild updated the Go toolchain to version 1.20.0. This had the unfortunate side effect of increasing the amount of stack space that esbuild uses (presumably due to some changes to Go's WebAssembly implementation) which could cause esbuild's WebAssembly-based API to crash with a stack overflow in cases where it previously didn't crash. One such case is the package grapheme-splitter which contains code that looks like this:

  if (
    (0x0300 <= code && code <= 0x036F) ||
    (0x0483 <= code && code <= 0x0487) ||
    (0x0488 <= code && code <= 0x0489) ||
    (0x0591 <= code && code <= 0x05BD) ||
    // ... many hundreds of lines later ...
  ) {
    return;
  }

  This edge case involves a chain of binary operators that results in an AST over 400 nodes deep. Normally this wouldn't be a problem because Go has growable call stacks, so the call stack would just grow to be as large as needed. However, WebAssembly byte code deliberately doesn't expose the ability to manipulate the stack pointer, so Go's WebAssembly translation is forced to use the fixed-size WebAssembly call stack. So esbuild's WebAssembly implementation is vulnerable to stack overflow in cases like these.

  It's not unreasonable for this to cause a stack overflow, and for esbuild's answer to this problem to be "don't write code like this." That's how many other AST-manipulation tools handle this problem. However, it's possible to implement AST traversal using iteration instead of recursion to work around limited call stack space. This version of esbuild implements this code transformation for esbuild's JavaScript parser and printer, so esbuild's WebAssembly implementation is now able to process the grapheme-splitter package (at least when compiled with Go 1.20.0 and run with node's WebAssembly implementation).

0.17.7

• Change esbuild's parsing of TypeScript instantiation expressions to match TypeScript 4.8+ (#2907)

  This release updates esbuild's implementation of instantiation expression erasure to match microsoft/TypeScript#49353. The new rules are as follows (copied from TypeScript's PR description):

  When a potential type argument list is followed by

  • a line break,
  • an ( token,
  • a template literal string, or
  • any token except < or > that isn't the start of an expression,

... (truncated)

Commits

• 5e0b1cd publish 0.17.8 to npm
• 93a5497 also use iteration to print binary ops (#2911)
• 5d4f511 move binary expr visiting into visitBinaryExpr
• 33daf46 fix #2911: use iteration to visit binary op nodes
• 3b8fc34 move binary expr visiting into visitBinaryExpr
• 1db6e12 fix #2910: minify+non-ASCII names before a keyword
• e345b13 publish 0.17.7 to npm
• 46a6673 fix #2907 instead of #2201
• 64a6388 fix #2201: update instantiation expression parsing
• 88e17d8 fix #1370, fix #1458, fix #2905: css tree-shaking
• Additional commits viewable in compare view

Dependabot will resolve any conflicts with this PR as long as you don't alter it yourself. You can also trigger a rebase manually by commenting @dependabot rebase.

---

Dependabot commands and options

You can trigger Dependabot actions by commenting on this PR:

• @dependabot rebase will rebase this PR
• @dependabot recreate will recreate this PR, overwriting any edits that have been made to it
• @dependabot merge will merge this PR after your CI passes on it
• @dependabot squash and merge will squash and merge this PR after your CI passes on it
• @dependabot cancel merge will cancel a previously requested merge and block automerging
• @dependabot reopen will reopen this PR if it is closed
• @dependabot close will close this PR and stop Dependabot recreating it. You can achieve the same result by closing it manually
• @dependabot ignore this major version will close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this major version (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself)
• @dependabot ignore this minor version will close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this minor version (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself)
• @dependabot ignore this dependency will close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this dependency (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself)

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Base: 72.32% // Head: 72.32% // No change to project coverage 👍

Coverage data is based on head (8bc47ff) compared to base (48ef645).
Patch has no changes to coverable lines.

Additional details and impacted files

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main      #16   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   72.32%   72.32%           
=======================================
  Files          66       66           
  Lines        3935     3935           
  Branches      739      739           
=======================================
  Hits         2846     2846           
  Misses       1088     1088           
  Partials        1        1           

Help us with your feedback. Take ten seconds to tell us how you rate us. Have a feature suggestion? Share it here.

☔ View full report at Codecov.
📢 Do you have feedback about the report comment? Let us know in this issue.