build(deps-dev): bump esbuild from 0.16.13 to 0.16.16

[dependabot]

Bumps esbuild from 0.16.13 to 0.16.16.

Release notes

Sourced from esbuild's releases.

v0.16.16

• Fix a regression caused by comment preservation (#2805)

  The new comment preservation behavior that was added in 0.16.14 introduced a regression where comments in certain locations could cause esbuild to omit certain necessary parentheses in the output. The outermost parentheses were incorrectly removed for the following syntax forms, which then introduced syntax errors:

  (/* comment */ { x: 0 }).x;
  (/* comment */ function () { })();
  (/* comment */ class { }).prototype;

  This regression has been fixed.

v0.16.15

• Add format to input files in the JSON metafile data

  When --metafile is enabled, input files may now have an additional format field that indicates the export format used by this file. When present, the value will either be cjs for CommonJS-style exports or esm for ESM-style exports. This can be useful in bundle analysis.

  For example, esbuild's new Bundle Size Analyzer now uses this information to visualize whether ESM or CommonJS was used for each directory and file of source code (click on the CJS/ESM bar at the top).

  This information is helpful when trying to reduce the size of your bundle. Using the ESM variant of a dependency instead of the CommonJS variant always results in a faster and smaller bundle because it omits CommonJS wrappers, and also may result in better tree-shaking as it allows esbuild to perform tree-shaking at the statement level instead of the module level.

• Fix a bundling edge case with dynamic import (#2793)

  This release fixes a bug where esbuild's bundler could produce incorrect output. The problematic edge case involves the entry point importing itself using a dynamic import() expression in an imported file, like this:

  // src/a.js
  export const A = 42;
  // src/b.js
  export const B = async () => (await import(".")).A
  // src/index.js
  export * from "./a"
  export * from "./b"

• Remove new type syntax from type declarations in the esbuild package (#2798)

  Previously you needed to use TypeScript 4.3 or newer when using the esbuild package from TypeScript code due to the use of a getter in an interface in node_modules/esbuild/lib/main.d.ts. This release removes this newer syntax to allow people with versions of TypeScript as far back as TypeScript 3.5 to use this latest version of the esbuild package. Here is change that was made to esbuild's type declarations:

   export interface OutputFile {
     /** "text" as bytes */
     contents: Uint8Array;
     /** "contents" as text (changes automatically with "contents") */
  -  get text(): string;
  +  readonly text: string;
   }

... (truncated)

Changelog

Sourced from esbuild's changelog.

0.16.16

• Fix a regression caused by comment preservation (#2805)

  The new comment preservation behavior that was added in 0.16.14 introduced a regression where comments in certain locations could cause esbuild to omit certain necessary parentheses in the output. The outermost parentheses were incorrectly removed for the following syntax forms, which then introduced syntax errors:

  (/* comment */ { x: 0 }).x;
  (/* comment */ function () { })();
  (/* comment */ class { }).prototype;

  This regression has been fixed.

0.16.15

• Add format to input files in the JSON metafile data

  When --metafile is enabled, input files may now have an additional format field that indicates the export format used by this file. When present, the value will either be cjs for CommonJS-style exports or esm for ESM-style exports. This can be useful in bundle analysis.

  For example, esbuild's new Bundle Size Analyzer now uses this information to visualize whether ESM or CommonJS was used for each directory and file of source code (click on the CJS/ESM bar at the top).

  This information is helpful when trying to reduce the size of your bundle. Using the ESM variant of a dependency instead of the CommonJS variant always results in a faster and smaller bundle because it omits CommonJS wrappers, and also may result in better tree-shaking as it allows esbuild to perform tree-shaking at the statement level instead of the module level.

• Fix a bundling edge case with dynamic import (#2793)

  This release fixes a bug where esbuild's bundler could produce incorrect output. The problematic edge case involves the entry point importing itself using a dynamic import() expression in an imported file, like this:

  // src/a.js
  export const A = 42;
  // src/b.js
  export const B = async () => (await import(".")).A
  // src/index.js
  export * from "./a"
  export * from "./b"

• Remove new type syntax from type declarations in the esbuild package (#2798)

  Previously you needed to use TypeScript 4.3 or newer when using the esbuild package from TypeScript code due to the use of a getter in an interface in node_modules/esbuild/lib/main.d.ts. This release removes this newer syntax to allow people with versions of TypeScript as far back as TypeScript 3.5 to use this latest version of the esbuild package. Here is change that was made to esbuild's type declarations:

   export interface OutputFile {
     /** "text" as bytes */
     contents: Uint8Array;
     /** "contents" as text (changes automatically with "contents") */
  -  get text(): string;

... (truncated)

Commits

• edede3c publish 0.16.16 to npm
• 7d89263 fix #2805: parentheses for commented expressions
• 9df9a65 only register plugin callbacks if needed
• 33a5159 publish 0.16.15 to npm
• b3b06c7 fix #2798: make type declarations work in TS v3.5+
• dad3e64 fix #2793: bundling edge case with dynamic import
• 6398f81 add "format" to inputs in metafile
• c572af4 JSON.parse + JSON.stringify: no side effects
• 93328af publish 0.16.14 to npm
• 98bd7c3 preserve comments in import assertions too
• Additional commits viewable in compare view

Dependabot will resolve any conflicts with this PR as long as you don't alter it yourself. You can also trigger a rebase manually by commenting @dependabot rebase.

---

Dependabot commands and options

You can trigger Dependabot actions by commenting on this PR:

• @dependabot rebase will rebase this PR
• @dependabot recreate will recreate this PR, overwriting any edits that have been made to it
• @dependabot merge will merge this PR after your CI passes on it
• @dependabot squash and merge will squash and merge this PR after your CI passes on it
• @dependabot cancel merge will cancel a previously requested merge and block automerging
• @dependabot reopen will reopen this PR if it is closed
• @dependabot close will close this PR and stop Dependabot recreating it. You can achieve the same result by closing it manually
• @dependabot ignore this major version will close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this major version (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself)
• @dependabot ignore this minor version will close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this minor version (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself)
• @dependabot ignore this dependency will close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this dependency (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself)

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Base: 71.66% // Head: 71.66% // No change to project coverage 👍

Coverage data is based on head (bcf616c) compared to base (3653159).
Patch has no changes to coverable lines.

Additional details and impacted files

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main       #6   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   71.66%   71.66%           
=======================================
  Files          69       69           
  Lines        3825     3825           
  Branches      724      724           
=======================================
  Hits         2741     2741           
  Misses       1084     1084           

Impacted Files	Coverage Δ
src/parser/eval.ts	87.50% <0.00%> (ø)
src/util/theme/index.ts	100.00% <0.00%> (ø)
src/parser/formula/index.ts	100.00% <0.00%> (ø)
src/components/BaseIcon/index.ts	93.75% <0.00%> (ø)

Help us with your feedback. Take ten seconds to tell us how you rate us. Have a feature suggestion? Share it here.

☔ View full report at Codecov.
📢 Do you have feedback about the report comment? Let us know in this issue.