Repository navigation
Research curriculum design
A full hybrid quantum-centric supercomputing curriculum should not be a queue of 87 notebooks or merely a sequence of popular quantum algorithms. Begin with mathematical foundations and classical scientific truth; then explore high-performance implementations and only then introduce quantum reformulations whose accuracy and resources can be meaningfully compared. Each module should be independently usable by a beginner, HPC engineer or domain specialist with the necessary prerequisites.
The curriculum should describe prerequisites as an explicit graph: Python/numerical methods, probability/linear algebra, basic quantum mechanics and computing, classical modeling, HPC scaling, scientific ML, circuit compilation, noise, QEC, hardware modality and domain application. A researcher in nuclear physics can enter through Hamiltonians; a finance student through stochastic processes/PDEs; a photonics researcher through Maxwell/Jones optics. Common validation/provenance standards unify the paths without requiring all learners to complete identical courses.
Financial engineering: classical statistics, Black–Scholes/PDE and Monte Carlo, portfolio optimization, GPU/HPC baselines, QAOA/amplitude estimation/HHL where justified, cost/resource metrics. Nuclear and HEP: conservation, nuclear many-body Hamiltonians, transport, lattice models and selected quantum simulation with independent high-precision references. CFD/PDE: discretization, convergence, conditioning, sparse solvers, hardware scaling and full quantum linear-system resource costs. QML: classical baselines, data encoding, reproducibility, trainability, no unsupported speedup claims. Photonics: optical fields, detectors, coherent/incoherent regimes, quantum states and measured validation.
Each modality deserves a substantial native-SDK and hardware model, including superconducting circuits, trapped ions, neutral atoms, semiconductor spins, photonic CV/DV states, analog simulators, qudits and dual-rail schemes. Include device physics, control/measurement, calibration, noise, error correction, ISA/compilation and resource estimates. A conceptual overview notebook is not a completed modality programme.
Require explicit learning outcomes, skill graph placement, reading prerequisites, runnable credential-free CPU path, known expected answers, mathematical derivations, numerical/statistical validation, runnable tests, references/license, limitations, cost estimate, optional QPU step and teaching feedback. Keep a separate content-development status from published curriculum approval.
Sources: master curriculum 2026–31, learning path, pathways and ingestion plan.
Quantum Workflows
- Home
- Getting started
- Academy and learning paths
- Batch-first simulator academy
- Reference experiments
- Standalone workstation and GPU notebooks
- Execution environments
- Scientific provenance
- Ecosystem integration
- Developer guide
- Troubleshooting
- Security and responsible science
- Contributing
- Guide help and support Scientific engineering
- Slurm runner contract
- Quantum SDK and executor matrix
- Research curriculum design
- Science validation and benchmarks
- Notebook environments and reproducibility